Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Entropia Intel | Market News Feed

Channel

Entropia Intel | Market News Feed

@EntropiaIntel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,843subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002177215925
TypeChannel
Username@EntropiaIntel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EntropiaIntel

Growth

3,8433,8643,853.57 August 2026 — 3,864 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,864 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,853 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,843 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,840–3,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:183,843-10
10 Aug 2026, 22:213,853-7
7 Aug 2026, 20:183,860-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:013,864no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:483,864first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

202 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡10652.5%
🔥3818.8%
🤣3316.3%
👍136.44%
🖕52.48%
👎41.98%
🤯31.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 2 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2025, 01:37 UTC≈6,220 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• Trump to make announcement at 2pm ET Tuesday - [DB]

🤡15🔥5🖕3

29 Aug 2025, 20:56 UTC≈6,660 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• Grayscale files S-1 for Polkadot ETF - [PN]

🤡13

29 Aug 2025, 20:56 UTC≈6,650 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• Grayscale files S-1 for Cardano ETF - [PN]

🤡12

28 Aug 2025, 15:11 UTC≈6,210 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• EU proposes tariff reductions to implement EU-US deal - [TF]

🤣11🔥5👍1

28 Aug 2025, 13:30 UTC≈6,220 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• Us putting GDP on blockchain targets 9 blockchains - [AGGR]

🤡11🤯3

27 Aug 2025, 20:57 UTC≈6,090 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• Nvidia: Trump's request for a % of rev 'may lead to litigation' • Nvidia: US govt has not codified 15% - [TF]

🤡4🤣4

27 Aug 2025, 20:21 UTC≈5,500 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• NVIDIA approves additional $60B in share buyback - [TF]

27 Aug 2025, 20:21 UTC≈4,980 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• Nvidia 2Q rev. $46.7B, est. $46.23B • Nvidia 2Q data center revenue $41.1B, est. $41.29B - [TF]

👍2🔥2

27 Aug 2025, 16:38 UTC≈4,220 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• FDA authorizes COVID vaccines for those at higher risk • FDA issues authorizations for Moderna, Pfizer, Novavax - [TF]

🤡11👍2🖕1

26 Aug 2025, 21:26 UTC≈3,500 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• Kindly MD files $5 billion shelf offering, may use proceeds to purchase Bitcoin - [PN]

🤡4🔥1

25 Aug 2025, 20:11 UTC≈3,300 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• CFTC acting chair Caroline Pham rumored to join MoonPay after permanent chair is confirmed - [PN]

🤡6👍1

25 Aug 2025, 15:49 UTC≈3,030 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

• Trump on Intel stake: I want many more cases like it - [TF]

🤡4👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EntropiaIntel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 395,661 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Entropia Intel | Market News Feed” (@EntropiaIntel), 3,843 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EntropiaIntel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.