๐คฃ not official no need root
๐คฃ6โค2

Channel
@EnneaChitChat
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
5,698subscribers
+2,105 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003580723489 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EnneaChitChat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EnneaChitChat |
Technology โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 5,698 | +295 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 5,403 | +141 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 5,262 | +155 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 5,107 | +131 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 4,976 | +165 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:13 | 4,811 | +133 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 4,678 | +101 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 4,577 | +134 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 4,443 | +217 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 4,226 | +147 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 4,079 | +151 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 3,928 | +148 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 3,780 | +158 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 3,622 | +29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 3,593 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 3,593 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
199 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 66 | 33.2% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 30 | 15.1% | |
| ๐คฃ | 26 | 13.1% | |
| ๐ฅ | 15 | 7.54% | |
| ๐ | 14 | 7.04% | |
| ๐ฑ | 14 | 7.04% | |
| ๐ | 12 | 6.03% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 4.02% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 2.51% | |
| ๐พ | 2 | 1.01% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 1.01% | |
| ๐คฉ | 2 | 1.01% | |
| ๐ณ | 1 | 0.503% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.503% | |
| ๐จ | 1 | 0.503% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐คฃ not official no need root
๐คฃ6โค2
Found OPPO ENG menu perm bypass auth-code method๐คฃ No need to enter the code to use the band lock stuff anymore
๐ฅฐ11โค4๐2๐พ2๐ณ1๐1
๐
โค7๐1
Wow
๐ฅ5โค2
Causeway Bay
๐3โค2
CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_DEVICES="binder,hwbinder,vndbinder" They provided binder to support Android ABI
We should be more permissive to str123 sincs he is an intelligent bro and wisdom. Ill say that he is in deed need more encouragement to work more on his own path. Regards. Ennea
โค7๐3๐1
huawei optimized its stuff so well that u cannot feel it switching between EL0/1 so frequently๐คฃ on its HongMeng Kernel
๐6
f u
๐ฅฐ7๐5๐2๐คฉ2๐1
๐ช๐๐คฃ
โค4๐2๐คฃ1
I want to crowdfund one unit for development LineageOS
โค5๐คฃ2
Try provisioned RPMB and enable sec boot on my MTP, and dead ๐ต mistakenly fused some other stuff damn , canโt even enter EDL now
๐ฑ14โค1๐1๐1๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @EnneaChitChat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โEnnea's Chitchat ๐จ๐ฆโ (@EnneaChitChat), 5,698 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EnneaChitChat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.