Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇬🇧ENGLISH | Attestatsiya🇺🇿

Channel

🇬🇧ENGLISH | Attestatsiya🇺🇿

@EnglishwithMsVasila

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,168subscribers

+203 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001762721009
TypeChannel
Username@EnglishwithMsVasila
DescriptionAssalomu alekum! 🇬🇧 Ingliz tili ATTESTATSIYAga biz bilan tayyorlaning! BEPUL BAZA 🧡 @EnglishwithVasila test guruhimiz 🧡 @EnglishwithMsVasilaTestbot test bot 🧡https://t.me/+9mRMtz8QuJQ5NDgy Result ADMINGA BOG'LANISH UCHUN: @EnglishwithMsVasilabot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/EnglishwithMsVasila

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,9358,1688,051.57 August 2026 — 7,965 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,962 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,947 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,941 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,943 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,935 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,949 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,958 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,998 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,015 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,029 subscribers24 September 2026 — 8,062 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,087 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,110 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,117 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,124 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,115 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,107 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,142 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,145 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,162 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,167 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,168 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 91 days, net +203. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,900–8,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 10:478,168+1
3 Nov 2026, 18:588,167+5
31 Oct 2026, 11:458,162+17
28 Oct 2026, 13:248,145+3
25 Oct 2026, 18:368,142+35
23 Oct 2026, 03:308,107-8
20 Oct 2026, 09:398,115-9
17 Oct 2026, 03:378,124+7
14 Oct 2026, 12:408,117+7
10 Oct 2026, 19:388,110+23
4 Oct 2026, 19:168,087+25
24 Sept 2026, 22:408,062+33
16 Sept 2026, 21:188,029+14
13 Sept 2026, 03:178,015+17
9 Sept 2026, 00:017,998+40
3 Sept 2026, 15:397,958+9
31 Aug 2026, 02:387,949+14
28 Aug 2026, 05:547,935-8
24 Aug 2026, 20:547,943+2
14 Aug 2026, 23:467,941first reading

Engagement

124 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.00%
avg views ÷ 8,168 subscribers
Avg views / post
735
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 124 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held124 (26 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total16,175
Reactions total259
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,800
Videos
≈476
Links
≈940

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 33s
Average length
3m 11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

598 reactions across 89 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14924.9%
❤‍🔥9716.2%
🔥9215.4%
❤8614.4%
🏆589.70%
👏244.01%
🆒152.51%
💯152.51%
🤩122.01%
🤔111.84%
💋101.67%
🐳71.17%
⚡40.669%
🍓40.669%
🕊40.669%
😱30.502%
🌚20.334%
😍20.334%
🤷‍♀20.334%
🤷10.167%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 124 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EnglishwithMsVasila. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 124 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (4.55%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC420 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
File

Module 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4-2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 savollardan tuzilgan 100talik test (2-variant) Malaka oshirishga borganlar yoki boradiganlar uchun Namunaviy Chiqish testi (O’zbek tilida) Testlarni o’rganib chiqing, Coursebook dan tuzilgan. Test oxirida Izohli javoblari ham bor! Tez orada yodlashila uchun Quiz testini ham tuzib beraman! #malaka_oshirish @EnglishwithMsVasila

👍4❤‍🔥1🔥1🤩1

7 Nov 2026, 18:10 UTC433 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
File

Module 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4-2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 savollardan tuzilgan 100talik test (1-variant) Malaka oshirishga borganlar yoki boradiganlar uchun Namunaviy Chiqish testi (O’zbek tilida) Testlarni o’rganib chiqing, Coursebook dan tuzilgan. Test oxirida Izohli javoblari ham bor! #malaka_oshirish @EnglishwithMsVasila

❤2🔥2👍1👏1🤩1

7 Nov 2026, 17:43 UTC455 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
File

Module 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 savollardan tuzilgan 100talik test Malaka oshirishga borganlar yoki boradiganlar uchun Namunaviy Chiqish testi (Ingliz tilida) Testlarni o’rganib chiqing, Coursebook dan tuzilgan. Test oxirida Izohli javoblari ham bor! Tez orada yodlash uchun Quiz testini ham qoldiraman! #malaka_oshirish @EnglishwithMsVasila

👍3❤‍🔥2👏1🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC511 viewsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Malaka oshirishdagilar bormi?

  1. Bor36%
  2. Yo’q67%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Nov 2026, 09:08 UTC682 views12 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
File

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟Mock 38: mavzular ro’yxati 🌟Test uch asosiy blokdan iborat: til bilimi, o’qish (reading) va metodika bilan kasbiy standart. 🌟 1. Til bilimi (Language Knowledge): 20 ta savol 🌟 2. O’qish ko’nikmasi (Reading): 15 ta savol 🌟 3. Metodika (Teaching Methodology): 8 ta savol 🌟 4. O’qituvchi kasbiy standarti: 5 ta savol 🌟 Tayyorgarlik uchun maslahat 🌟 Reading (15 ta savol, test yarmining ancha qismi) uchun in…

❤5👍4❤‍🔥1👏1🤩1

7 Nov 2026, 07:40 UTC633 views26 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Assalomu alaykum hammaga Attestatsiya Mock bersam ishlediganlar bormi?

👍14💯10🔥1😍1

6 Nov 2026, 10:03 UTC806 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Mock 38: Overall 82 Teacher's name: Rakhmatullayeva Gulmira

🔥7❤‍🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC985 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍1⃣ PHONETICS 1. MOCK 1 PHONETICS 2. MOCK 2 PHONETICS 3. MOCK 3 PHONETICS 4. MOCK 4 PHONETICS 5. MOCK 5 PHONETICS 6. MOCK 6 PHONETICS 7. MOCK 7 PHONETICS 8. MOCK 8 PHONETICS 9 MOCK 9 PHONETICS 10. MOCK 10 PHONETICS 11 MOCK 11 PHONETICS 12. MOCK 12 1.1 PHONETICS 13. MOCK 13 1.2 PHONETICS 14. MOCK 14 1.3 PHONETICS 15. MOCK 15 1.4 PH…

❤‍🔥5❤2

3 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC993 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Assalomu alaykum kattakon rahmat sizga judayam foydali real-examga o'xshaydigan testlar beryapsiz, hammasini ishlab boryapmiz, Alloh rozi bo'lsin 🤲

❤‍🔥5

3 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC857 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Mok test deb googlega qidirgandim kanalizga utib qoldim keyin

❤‍🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,060 views38 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Eng ko’p ovozga ko’ra Uzbek variantni qoldirvoman Mock 37 Izohli javoblari, rahmat aytish uchun yurakchani bosib qo’ying ❤️

❤‍🔥21❤14🔥2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @EnglishwithMsVasila. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Poll86 voters

Malaka oshirishdagilar bormi?

  1. Bor36%
  2. Yo’q67%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz300 voters

5. Which closing is most suitable for a formal email to someone whose name you do not know (“Dear Sir or Madam”)?

  1. a) Cheers,5%
  2. b) Love,2%
  3. c) Yours faithfully,92%
  4. d) See ya,2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 16:19 UTCAnonymous Quiz269 voters

4. You are writing to a customer who complained about a late delivery. Which sentence is most appropriate?

  1. a) Sorry, stuff happens.2%
  2. b) We apologise for the delay and are looking into the matter.88%
  3. c) It’s not our fault, the post was slow.4%
  4. d) We hereby acknowledge the aforementioned del6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 16:14 UTCAnonymous Quiz249 voters

3. Which phrase is the most formal way to ask for information?

  1. a) Tell me the price.2%
  2. b) What’s the price?4%
  3. d) Gimme the price.2%
  4. c) Could you possibly tell me the price?92%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 16:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz242 voters

2. You are emailing your close friend to invite her to a party. Which sentence is most appropriate?

  1. a) I would be honoured if you could attend my gathering.22%
  2. b) You are cordially invited to my party.8%
  3. c) Do come to my party on Saturday, it’ll be fun!60%
  4. d) Your attendance is requested at the aforementioned event.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 15:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz250 voters

1. You are writing to your bank manager, whom you don’t know, to ask for a loan. Which opening is most appropriate?

  1. a) Hey, I need some cash.1%
  2. b) I am writing to enquire about a personal loan.75%
  3. c) The undersigned hereby requests monetary assistance.20%
  4. d) Hi there, can you lend me money?4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Attestatsiya| SHEROVA 👑
@attestatsiyaaa_sherova · 39,280
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
Oliy toifa | Feruza Ikramova
@oliytoifasari_attestatsiya · 31,590
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
NASIBA ABDULLAYEVA
@AttestatsiyaNasiba · 151,678
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇬🇧ENGLISH | Attestatsiya🇺🇿” (@EnglishwithMsVasila), 8,168 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EnglishwithMsVasila.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.