Channel
@English_TST
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,570subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001596878369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @English_TST |
| Description | Boost: https://t.me/boost/English_TST Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/English_TST ◉ Explore our channel for interactive English quizzes tailored to all levels in grammar, vocabulary, reading comprehension, and writing skills. ◉ Contact: @EnglishTSTBot |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/English_TST |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 15,570 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 15,567 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 15,568 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 15,566 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 15,580 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 15,585 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 15,591 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 15,595 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 15,596 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
332 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 156 | 47.0% | |
| 😢 | 84 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 8.43% | |
| 🎉 | 22 | 6.63% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 3.92% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 3.01% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 3.01% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.11% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.602% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 332reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
My brother usually ___ breakfast at 7 AM.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤10😢7🎉5🔥3❤🔥2👍1
Which word best replaces 'exhausted' in this sentence: "After the 10-mile run, Sarah was completely exhausted."?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤17❤🔥2👍2😢2
Identify the grammatical error in the following sentence: "She strongly dislikes to wake up early on weekends."
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😢10❤4👍4🎉2❤🔥1
Choose the most formal and emphatic way to rewrite this sentence: "I had never seen such a beautiful performance."
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😢9👍2🎉1🤩1
Please remember to ___ your bed before you leave for school.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤10😢6🎉2👍2
If someone says they need to "bite the bullet," what are they going to do?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6😢6🎉4👍1
Read the sentence and fill in the correct homophone: "The king's army marched ___ the dense forest."
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤10
Complete this mixed conditional sentence: "If he hadn't missed his flight yesterday, he ___ on the beach right now."
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔8❤5
"Wow, another flat tire in the rain! Just what I needed today." What is the speaker's tone?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤8😢6🎉1
We have an important team meeting scheduled ___ Monday morning.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7😢3🎉2
Which word implies that a statement has more than one possible meaning?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7😢5
What is the implied meaning of this sentence? "He is ostensibly the manager, but his assistant pulls the strings."
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7😢6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @English_TST. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
My brother usually ___ breakfast at 7 AM.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which word best replaces 'exhausted' in this sentence: "After the 10-mile run, Sarah was completely exhausted."?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Identify the grammatical error in the following sentence: "She strongly dislikes to wake up early on weekends."
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Choose the most formal and emphatic way to rewrite this sentence: "I had never seen such a beautiful performance."
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Please remember to ___ your bed before you leave for school.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
If someone says they need to "bite the bullet," what are they going to do?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 22 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 298,416 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Quizzes & Tests” (@English_TST), 15,570 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/English_TST.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.