Channel
@English_Grammar_AtoZ
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,471subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001536780606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @English_Grammar_AtoZ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/English_Grammar_AtoZ |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 4,471 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 4,475 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 4,479 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:03 | 4,483 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 4,485 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 4,486 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 4,484 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 4,489 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 4,488 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 4,493 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 4,491 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 4,489 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 4,487 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 4,487 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
173 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 47.4% | |
| 👍 | 74 | 42.8% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 2.31% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.31% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.578% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👨🏫 اشتباه رایج: تفاوت until و by 1️⃣ until (تا زمانی که / تا) از until برای بیان عملی یا وضعیتی استفاده میکنیم که تا یک زمان مشخص ادامه دارد. Examples (مثالها): The shops are open until 5:30. مغازهها تا ساعت ۵:۳۰ باز هستند. I'll wait here until you get back. اینجا منتظر میمانم تا برگردی. 2️⃣ by (حداکثر تا / تا قبل یا در موعد مقرر) از by برای بیان عملی استفاده میکنیم که باید حداکثر تا یک زمان مشخص (یا در همان زم…
❤5
🔺تفاوت Say و Tell این دو فعل هر دو به «گفتن» مربوط میشوند، اما ساختارشان فرق دارد: 1) Say + something وقتی فقط حرف / جمله / مطلبی را بیان میکنیم. ✅ He said hello. 🔸او سلام کرد. ✅ She said that she was tired. 🔸او گفت که خسته است. 2) Tell + someone + something وقتی حرفی را به کسی میگوییم. ✅ He told me the truth. 🔸او حقیقت را به من گفت. ✅ She told us that she was tired. 🔸او به ما گفت که خسته است. 📌 نکته مهم بعد از te…
❤7👍2
⏳ زمان افعال در یک نگاه : 🔵 I do = انجام میدم 🔵 I am doing = دارم انجام ميدم 🔵 I have done = انجام داده ام 🔵 I have been doing = مدتيه دارم انجام ميدم 🟡 I did انجام دادم 🟡 I was doing = داشتم انجام ميدادم 🟡 I had done = انجام داده بودم 🟡 I had been doing = مدتى بود داشتم انجام ميدادم 🟣 I will do = انجام خواهم داد 🟣 I will be doing = قراره انجام بدم 🟣 by next week I will have done = تا هفته ى دیگه انجام …
❤12👍3👌2🙏2
. 🔺تفاوت "So" و "Such" 1. So + adjective ✅He is so tall. 🔸(اون خیلی قد بلنده) 2. Such + (a/an) + adjective + noun ✅He is such a tall guy. 🔸(اون واقعاً یه مرد قد بلنده) 📗فرمول So + صفت | Such + اسم + صفت حمیدرضا حافظی مدرس زبان @RealHamidrezaHafezi گروه تبادل نظر @Hafezigroup
👍6❤5
#اشتباهات رایج گرامری: ⛔️ Mary pretended to not recognize me. ✅ Mary pretended not to recognize me. 👈مری تظاهر کرد که مرا ندیده. 💥نکته: هنگامی که میخواهیم در زبان انگلیسی یک infinitive یا همان مصدر با to را منفی کنیم, باید not منفی کننده را قبل از to بگذاریم و نه پس از آن بین to و فعل. به مثالهای زیر دقت کنید: ⛔️to not see ✅not to see ⛔️to not have ✅not to have حمیدرضا حافظی مدرس زبان @RealHamidrezaHafezi htt…
❤7👍3
💡 نکته گرامری امروز: 🔹 Be supposed to = "قراره که / انتظار میره که" ✔️ وقتی دربارهی وظیفه، قانون، یا چیزی که انتظار میره انجام بشه حرف میزنیم. 📌 مثالها: - Students are supposed to be quiet in class. 📚🤫 (انتظار میره دانشآموزا تو کلاس ساکت باشن) - You are not supposed to park here. 🚗❌ (نباید اینجا پارک کنی / پارک کردن اینجا ممنوعه) - I was supposed to call you yesterday. 📞😅 (قرار بود دیروز بهت زنگ بزنم) ⚠️ نک…
👍8
✳️IELTS TIPS✳️ #Common_Mistake #Grammar #ILETS #WRITING وقتی بخواهیم از «دست یافتن به چیزی/هدفی پس از تلاش زیاد» صحبت کنیم، فعل achieve بکار میرود (نه obtain). مثال: • The company intends to achieve all these goals within the next five years. شرکت قصد دارد در پنج سال آینده به تمام این اهداف دست پیدا کند. 🖋 با توجه به توضیحات داده شده، جملهی زیر اشتباه است: ❌ It has taken women a long time to obtain equality. …
❤3👍2
100 Common English Questions and Answers | How to Ask and Answer Questions in English ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ English Grammar 🌱 @English_Grammar_AtoZ 🏆 Disscusion Group: @EnglishSpeakinggrouph 👑 Main Channel: @TENAChannel 📣 Speaking Topics: @EnglishSpeakingTopics
👍4❤1
🔹She would have passed the exam __ she had studied harder. الف) unless ب) if ✅ ج) although د) because ✳️ تحلیل سریع: ساختار جمله شرطی نوع سومه (شرط غیرواقعی در گذشته): would have + pp → در جمله اصلی had + pp → در جمله شرطی پس فقط گزینهی if درسته. ✅ جواب درست: if 💡 نکتهی طلایی: 🔸 شرطی نوع سوم برای موقعیتهایی استفاده میشه که در گذشته رخ ندادهاند: مثلاً: If I had left earlier, I wouldn’t have missed the bus. En…
❤3👍1
🧛risk ❇️توی این پست چند تا عبارت رایج با واژه ی risk داریم که برای موضوع های ریسک کردن، بیزینس ها و ورزش هایی که ریسکشون بالاست و تاپیک هایی با محوریت ریسک، بسیار کاربردین. می تونید هم توی رایتینگ و هم اسپیکینگ از این عبارات استفاده کنید. به مثال های زیر دقت کنید: ✔️an element/degree of risk میزانی از خطر 🔸There is always an element of risk in flying. همیشه در پرواز با هواپیما، میزانی از خطر وجود دارد. 🔸Understa…
❤5👌2
👨🏫 الان وقتشه بریم سراغ یه ساختار باحال، خفن، و حرفهای که خیلیا بلد نیستن ولی وقتی استفاده کنی همه میگن: این چقد خوب حرف میزنه! 😏 📘 گرامر باحال امروز: if it weren’t for / if it hadn’t been for 🔹 یعنی: اگه فلان چیز نبود / اگه فلان اتفاق نیفتاده بود... برای نشون دادن اینکه یه چیز باعث یه نتیجه شده ـ یا میتونه بشه. ✅ 1. If it weren’t for (برای زمان حال یا آینده فرضی) ✔️ If it weren’t for you, I’d be lost. (اگ…
👍6❤4🍓1🍾1
اسم جمع (Collective Noun): 🖋 اسم جمع اسمی است که به گروهی از افراد، اشیاء یا حیوانات اشاره کند. مثل: team, army, jury, group ✳️ اگر اسم جمع مانند یک واحد پول، یک دسته یا یک گروه مورد نظر قرار گیرد، با فعل مفرد به کار می رود. مثال: ✅ The jury is in the courtroom. هیئت منصفه هنوز داخل دادگاه است. 👨🏫 در مثال بالا چون منظور از jury یک واحد کلی (a whole unit) یا یک هیئت منصفهی واحد تلقی میشود، فعل مربوط به آن به صو…
❤2🍾1🏆1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @English_Grammar_AtoZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Grammar” (@English_Grammar_AtoZ), 4,471 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/English_Grammar_AtoZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.