File, posted without a caption

Channel
ریاضیات در مهندسی
@Enging_Mathematics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,770subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001777977867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Enging_Mathematics |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Enging_Mathematics |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 1,770 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 1,756 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 1,758 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 1,758 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 47.0%
- avg views ÷ 1,770 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 831
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 December 2025 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 7,481 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3h 12m
- Average length
- 1h 04m
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
بسیار ساده ولی بسیار عمیق و کاربردی
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
@tabeshpour
@tabeshpour
@tabeshpour
شروع سرفصل بارم بندی ویدئو یک ریاضی پیشرفته: ✅ ضرورت ریاضی در مهندسی ویدئو دو ریاضی پیشرفته: ✅ توانایی انسان در ریاضی ✅ شمارش ✅ فلسفه محور اعداد ✅ بردار پایه ✅ استقلال و وابستگی ✅ تعامد و موازی بودن ویدئو سه ریاضی پیشرفته: ✅ بردار ✅ فضای برداری ✅ بردار پایه ✅ بسط تیلور ویدئو چهار ریاضی پیشرفته: ✅ مفهوم کار ✅ ضری داخلی ویدئو پنج ریاضی پیشرفته: ✅ چیستی مشتق ✅ لزوم حد و میل به سمت صفر ویدئو شش ریاضی پیشرفته: ✅ چ…
کانال دستنامه در پیامرسان بله ایجاد شد و به مرور لینک اپارات ویدئوهای دروسی که تاکنون رکورد و منتشر شده است در آن بصورت دستهبندی شده قرار خواهد گرفت تا در صورت لزوم باعث سهولت استفاده شود: «دستنامه» 🆔 شناسه: https://ble.ir/dastnameh تابشپور
#ویدئو_بخش_24 ریاضی مهندسی پیشرفته ✅ جبر خطی: مقدمه لینک آپارات: https://www.aparat.com/v/vvb699a https://t.me/Enging_Mathematics فهرست کانال ها: @tabeshpour
آیا وجود هوش مصنوعی باعث میشود که نیاز به خواندن کتابها کم شود؟ https://t.me/tabeshpour
پاسخ چت جیبیتی: برای تدریس ریاضیات مهندسی پیشرفته، اگر بخواهم تنها یک توصیه کلیدی ارائه کنم، آن این است: هوش مصنوعی باید زمان شما را از «حلهای تکراری» آزاد کند تا بتوانید روی «آموزش مفهومی» تمرکز کنید. در این درس، دانشجو بیش از هر چیز نیاز دارد بداند چرا یک روش ریاضی به کار میرود، نه فقط چگونه آن را محاسبه کند. این بخش را هیچ ابزار هوش مصنوعی بهخوبی یک استاد باتجربه منتقل نمیکند. بهترین تقسیم کار بین استاد و…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Enging_Mathematics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 38,786 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ریاضیات در مهندسی” (@Enging_Mathematics), 1,770 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Enging_Mathematics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.