3 measurements spanning 22 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 22:04
143
+1
8 Aug 2026, 21:47
142
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:34
142
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 143 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
13 (14 April 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
54
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
101 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
36
35.6%
🔥
30
29.7%
❤
16
15.8%
😁
9
8.91%
🥰
6
5.94%
🤔
3
2.97%
💯
1
0.99%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If you think you are beaten, you are
If you think you dare not, you don't,
If you like to win, but you think you can't
It is almost certain you won't.
If you think you'll lose, you're lost
For out of the world we find,
Success begins with a fellow's will
It's all in the state of mind.
If you think you are outclassed, you are
You've got to think high to rise,
You've got to be sure of yourself before
You can ever win…
Пополняю коллекцию сертификатов. В этот раз - дополнительный курс для преподавателей IELTS, чтобы лучше понимать критерии оценивания письменной и устной частей. Понимаешь критерии оценки - понимаешь, что и как можно улучшить или исправить - получаешь более высокий балл.
Искусственный интеллект заменил меня.
🤩 Но не полностью, конечно, а частично: только в той моей части, которой пришлось бы выучить язык разметки, чтобы создать онлайн тренажер для отработки Key Words Transformation* для экзамена Cambridge B2 First, а еще в части придумывания сотки заданий для отработки всех необходимых тем.
Потестить, что на выходных получилось сделать у нас с искусственным другом, и попрактиковать…
Профдеформация это когда сидишь на велотренажере и оцениваешь ошибки в предупредительных надписях на английском с точки зрения кембриджских критериев.
Не мешают понять смысл? Отлично, на баллы не влияют. Мешают уловить идею и препятствуют передаче смысла? Тогда баллы падают.
Вот тут, например, какие ошибки видите, и какие из них стрем impede communication, а какие норм?
Правильный ответ на самом деле: все варианты 😃
Совет go touch grass 🌿про то, чтобы побыть на природе и поделать что то в реальном, а не виртуальном мире (можно и коров покормить, why not). На выходных старалась активно этому совету следовать.
Зачем ты ешь слона?
Мы все слышали:
Слона едят по кусочку
или
How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time
Это такой совет дают, когда задача кажется гигантской — типа, не бойся, просто начинай с малого, шаг за шагом.
Звучит вроде нормально, но может, стоит сначала разобраться с другими вопросами:
❓ А точно ли это твой слон?
Или все же чужой?
Мы может просто проходили мимо, а нам в руки уже дали вилку: "Ешь…
Практически единогласно!
Да, шеф-повар использует слово cook дважды - один раз в прямом значении, а один раз в переносном, для игры слов, создания легкого юмористического эффекта. Фраза:
I'm too busy cooking the food to cook the books.
строится на контрасте этих двух значений:
cook the food - "готовить еду"
cook the books - идиома, означающая "подделывать бухгалтерию", "фальсифицировать отчёты". Про другие идиомы с…
Шеф-повар радушно приветствует в своем ресторане постоянного гостя (прокурора, что важно).
Между ними происходит вот такой диалог:
- Monsieur le prosecutor, I swear to God I'm too busy cooking the food to cook the books!
- You know, being a criminal takes hard work. You're French, I don't have to worry about it.
Время познакомиться с Longman Dictionary - не просто как с очередным словарём, а как с полезным инструментом.
📌 Где найти?
Онлайн здесь, бесплатно: ldoceonline.com.
Чем хорош как словарь?
Все определения написаны на основе 2 000 самых частотных слов английского языка (если уже знаешь эти 2000, то и остальные поймешь, не спотыкаясь о незнакомые слова).
💡Почему инструмент?
Во-первых, , можно получить понимание, …
🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @EngRidge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На что у шефа не хватает времени, потому что он слишком занят приготовлением еды?
На готовку книг, очевидно же0%
На чтение9%
На махинации с бухгалтерией и налогами91%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FYI|Gala Russu” (@EngRidge), 143 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EngRidge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.