Channel
@En_QO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
796subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315624874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @En_QO |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/En_QO |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 796 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 795 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 795 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,239 |
| Reactions total | 1,336 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,336 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449394813709327952 | 789 | 59.1% | |
| custom 5780604261872179128 | 353 | 26.4% | |
| ⚡ | 120 | 8.98% | |
| custom 6042043572629279760 | 52 | 3.89% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 1.50% | |
| custom 5451714942157724312 | 2 | 0.15% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,336reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @En_QO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
الايام القادمة ستكون صعبة صعبة جداً، للشعب اليمني في الداخل والخارج، اللهم احقن دماء الشعب اليمني، - يارب .
custom 604204357262927976052👍2custom 54517149421577243122
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
يقول أحدهم: عندما اسست مشروعي الصغير تعرضت لخساره فادحه في اول سنه، وتراكمت علي الديون، فجاءني رجل مسن كان يشتري مني باستمرار وأعطاني ظرفاً فيه مبلغ مالي بسيط، وقال لي: اكمل عملك ولا تتوقف انا اثق بك دارت الايام وفتح الله علي وأصبح مشروعي من اكبر الشركات في البلاد. بحثت عن هذا الرجل المسن لأرد له الجميل مضاعفا، فوجدته قد توفي وترك ابنا يبحث عن عمل، عينت إبنه مديرا في شركتي براتب مجزٍ. "الخير كالبذره، تزرعها في مكا…
custom 544939481370932795242custom 578060426187217912813👍10
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
لا يمتطي المجدَ من لم يركبِ الخطرا ولا ينالُ العلى من قدمَ الحذرا ومن أرادَ العلى عفواً بلا تعبٍ، قضَى ولم يَقضِ من إدراكِها وطرا
custom 544939481370932795231custom 57806042618721791288👍5
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
التعقيب بخصوص نقطة المشاعر، اسأل نفسك . لماذا لا يكون الداء للدواء !؟ . كما قال الامام بن القيم، اذا كان نعم توكل، مالم انسى . . .
custom 544939481370932795219custom 578060426187217912812👍3
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
عود نفسك الرضا بما قسمه الله لك، وبالنصيب الذي كتبه لك، وبالطريق الذي مهده لك، وبما يسره لك في حياتك. وثق ان تدبيره خير من تدبيرك لنفسك، وأن علمه اوسع من فهمك، وحكمته اجلُّ من ان يُحيط بها عقلك، ولو كشفت لنا استار الغيب، لما اخترنا الا ما اختاره الله لنا .
custom 544939481370932795244custom 578060426187217912813⚡6
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
لا تُبادر بالصلح مع من خاصمك بغير حق، فتضع نفسك في غير موضعها، وتمنحه قدرًا لا يستحقه. قد عفونا صفحًا، وسامحنا ابتغاء وجه الله، غير أن الودّ إذا انقطع لا يُستعاد، والعِشرة إذا انقضت لا تعود كما كانت. لا نحمل لهم حقدًا، ولا نبتغي قربهم؛ فقد غفرنا، ومضى كلٌّ إلى سبيله.
custom 544939481370932795236⚡9custom 57806042618721791289
Signed • عدي
تذكرت قصة احد الأصدقاء. كان مجتهداً ومتفوقاً جداً في الكلية، ويتحدث الألمانية والإنجليزية بطلاقة، حتى انه كان يصحح بعض اخطاء الدكاترة احياناً. وفي السنة الرابعة مرَّ بظرفٍ منعه من دخول الامتحانات، فاضطر الى اعادة السنة. وعندما عاد للدراسة مرة اخرى، حدثت مشكلة بين بعض زملائه وأحد الدكاترة، فتأثر بها وخسر مادة اخرى، رغم انه لم يكن مذنباً وكان مستعداً لها جيداً. انخفض تقديره، وضاع حلمه في ان يصبح معيداً، وشعر حينها أن…
custom 544939481370932795270custom 578060426187217912815⚡7
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
«الحياة أبسَط من أن تحتاج إلى كلِّ هذه الجلبة والضوضاء، فخذوها من أقرب وجُوهها، إنَّما أنتم مارُّون لا مقيمون». - المنفلوطي.
custom 544939481370932795232custom 578060426187217912810⚡6
Signed • عدي
هناك فرق كبير بين ان تكبر في العمر، وان تكبر في العقل. فالسن تمنحه لك الأيام، اما النضج فتمنحه لك التجارب. قد تجد شاباً في العشرين يحمل من الحكمة ما لا يحمله رجل تجاوز الخمسين، وقد ترى آخر شابت رأسه وما زال يكرر اخطاء الأمس. لذلك لا تجعل عدد سنواتك هو ما يتحدث عنك، بل اجعل اخلاقك، وطريقة تفكيرك، وأثرك في الناس هي التي تُخبرهم من أنت. - صباح الخير .
custom 544939481370932795235custom 578060426187217912813⚡6
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
- رزقني الله انا ويوسف وسعد برفيق لنا اسمه، ابراهيم، نعم الصاحب ونعم الرفيق❤️.
custom 544939481370932795244custom 578060426187217912813⚡6
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
don't underestimate ur good impact. u maybe a light for someone without even knowing it. perhaps u once spoke a word that reached someone's ears, settled deep in their heart, and became a turning point in their life. perhaps u offered a sincere piece of advice that changed someone's life for the better. or maybe u planted a seed of goodness, walked away, and forgot about it only to find that today it has grown into a…
custom 544939481370932795228custom 578060426187217912811⚡3
Signed عمر اليوسفي .
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 544939481370932795235custom 578060426187217912818⚡6
Signed • عدي
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @En_QO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 182,185 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“م. عُمَر اليُوسُفي | LX” (@En_QO), 796 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/En_QO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.