Channel
@EmpireOfCallers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001740720437 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EmpireOfCallers |
| Description | All the top callers in one place. |
| Created | 3 March 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EmpireOfCallers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 1 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 3 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
(1/2) Who would you like to see? (Minimum of 10 votes will get added to the list)
The shares total 215%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Test: just to see if it gets forwarded
How many callers do you keep an eye on?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
This was a little test run, if you've been keeping an eye on the channel you were able to see that it works smoothly! Will be tweaking it a bit more before releasing it in the upcoming days!
Surely, that's the bottom on $HEAL right?
Video, posted without a caption
$PUNU/PussyONU: Mainnet-BSC Scale: 1-1.5 👉Now this one is what I got eyes on. Why? 👉Launched at like 4k mcap, now sitting at 43k. Liq is at 28k which is insanely high relative to where it's at. 👉Basically a cat coin, but this one is backed by a dev with his own call channel (https://t.me/hulksgemscalls) -LP is locked for 1 month with no team or dev tokens. 👉They expect to land big marketing for this one, so I'm hopef…
⚾️⚾️Durham Inu ($RBI ERC 20) ⚾️⚾️ TG: t.me/DurhamInu In less than 2 weeks we’ve provided direct assistance to 14+ players, given away 💰$15 000💰 ⚡️ We also just on boarded Ryan Sheriff from MLB to our Advisory board to help spread this mission!!!⚡️ We want to help all the players in the minor league who are underpaid and need your help to make this a reality. Show your support and make gains by buying $RBI Contr…
Alright, let's test it out for a while! 👀
Like all of you guys, I know the struggle of having 5-10 callers in your Telegram. With all those other groups you're in, you just sometimes miss a call, and that one play you were looking for slipped away from you. I've had this happen to myself so many times, that's why I made this channel. All your favourite callers in one place, never having to scroll through dozens of chats or have seperate folders just for tho…
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @EmpireOfCallers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
(1/2) Who would you like to see? (Minimum of 10 votes will get added to the list)
The shares total 215%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How many callers do you keep an eye on?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2022 to 16 March 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@EmpireOfCallers named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Empire of Callers” (@EmpireOfCallers), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EmpireOfCallers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.