Channel
@EmiLysSafuGems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,463subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001782654201 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EmiLysSafuGems |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EmiLysSafuGems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 2,463 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 2,467 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 2,469 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 2,471 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 2,472 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
One of the main reasons $Crepe builders are different on #BNB chain is simple: They never built their project around @cz_binance, Binance, or any kind of interaction. Crepe is not related to anyone in the market. They build their own brand. They don’t rely on hype, copycat platforms, or borrowed narratives. I’m away from the degen market for almost year and I just check it time by time. Today, I looked at a few pri…
If the $Crepe resistance at 50M is broken, we will see 60-80M in next leg. https://x.com/crypt_emm/status/1981575758058570141
When you search your ticker on X, you see what kind of community you have. When I search $CREPE, I see pure madness on #BNB chain. They don’t have a blue tick. They don’t have a lot of followers, but they grow up interlocked together like a snowball and work for the same thing under one roof. These people are crazy hardworkers… easily one of the most active communities of 2025. Much respect for this people… htt…
You’re not bullish enough on $Crepe. The Crepe Take Over on #BNB is real. Many people keep chasing hype, flipping memecoins like gamblers in a crypto casino. At the end of the day, they lose. But believers invest in high-class memecoins with strong communities and hold with faith. That’s why Crepe is so valuable in my opinion. The people behind it are stubborn, consistent builders and the holders are strong. We d…
Next round on $Crepe? Clearly the best #BNB community ever, with the most stubborn developers. I wouldn’t be surprised if $Crepe reaches $100M in the next few months. That would likely mean a 1000x for us. I haven’t given you a 1000x this year. let’s do it with $Crepe. https://x.com/crypt_emm/status/1979885148897525928
The $Crepe chart speaking itself. I can’t calculate how many Xs we made. I can simply say that it is the most successful #BNB project of 2025 and we catched it. People faded me at 2M when I said it’s not top… They said crepe will dump again… They did same at 5M… Again at 15M… And again at 25M… It’s 45M now… Will you keep fading money again and again? I do think couple of cex listing can happen in anytime… Keep Bu…
Imagine they fading our convicted plays on #BNB 🤔🤭 Let’s check what hapenned in $Crepe 😊🤗 When $CREPE was only 15M, THE CONDITIONS WAS LIKE 👇 • 150X to those who joined from presale with my WL giveaway • 60X to those who bought at the launch top • 400X to those who bought at the lowest price Then what did I tell you? 👇 “People think it’s the highest price, but actually it’s the bottom right now.” Prophecy became…
They see top when they look at chart but I see bullish flag when I look at from high. Chart promising much more higher. Crepe looking tasty.
More respect for $Crepe 😊🙏 https://x.com/crypt_emm/status/1968356261788856808
Do you remember the moments when people sold Crepe at the bottom? I would like to remind you of this because they thought they were whales when they sold 🤭🤭 $Crepe did 125X for my wl winners. 65X for launch buyers. 375X for dip buyers. Every year, one life changer play on Emily’s Gems. Every year from zero to hero… Did you catched star of 2025? 😮💨
CREPE Buy! 🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞🥞 Spent: 1.44 WBNB ($1,370.34) Got: 57,658,906.97 CREPE Buyer Position: ⬆️ 49.95%! Buyer Holdings: 173,102,480.45 CREPE ($4,137.31) Buye
$Crepe looks tasty 😇 Chart started moving after Bullflag forming. After giving away wl in $Crepe, the crepe made 100X. Those who bought it at the launch, it made 300X from lowest launch price. Literally best presale of year 😊
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EmiLysSafuGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 233,968 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@EmiLysSafuGems named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Emily’s Gems” (@EmiLysSafuGems), 2,463 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EmiLysSafuGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.