🧬 اِمِری پلاس (فراژنوم) ژنتیک پزشکی pinned «⬅️ خلاصه ای از نتایج ۵ سال اخیر جزوات امری پلاس 📍رتبه ۱ کل ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۹۹ 📍 رتبه ۱ کل ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۲ 📍 رتبه ۱ دکترا وزارت علوم سال ۱۴۰۲ 📍 رتبه ۱ سهمیه ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۳ 📍 رتبه کل ۲ ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۴ 📍 و رتبه ۱ کل دکترا…»

Channel
🧬 اِمِری پلاس ➕ژنتیک پزشکی
@EmeryPlus
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,626subscribers
+153 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001121156031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EmeryPlus |
| Description | 🔴لیست تدریس های امری پلاس: 👇 https://t.me/EmeryPlus/8745 🧬 سایت فراژنوم: Faragenome.ir/shop ⭐️ سفارش جزوات امری، استراخان و تامپسون، جرد، اختلالات متابولیسم، مهندسی و سیتوژنتیک: @Hsni7 📍لینک گروه پرسش و پاسخ: @EmeryGroup |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 April 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EmeryPlus |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:09 | 9,626 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:56 | 9,639 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:41 | 9,648 | +11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 9,637 | -20 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:29 | 9,657 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 9,672 | +35 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 9,637 | -8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:07 | 9,645 | -8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 9,653 | -25 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 9,678 | -25 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 9,703 | -40 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 9,743 | -53 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 9,796 | +22 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 9,774 | +19 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 9,755 | +33 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 9,722 | +19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 9,703 | +12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 9,691 | +36 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 9,655 | +22 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 9,633 | first reading |
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.02%
- avg views ÷ 9,626 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 387
- 46 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.569%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 51
- of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (3 July 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,806 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 11:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,070
- Videos
- ≈44
- Links
- ≈337
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 54.9% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 35.3% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 51 posts held from the last 30 days (11.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⬅️ خلاصه ای از نتایج ۵ سال اخیر جزوات امری پلاس 📍رتبه ۱ کل ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۹۹ 📍 رتبه ۱ کل ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۲ 📍 رتبه ۱ دکترا وزارت علوم سال ۱۴۰۲ 📍 رتبه ۱ سهمیه ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۳ 📍 رتبه کل ۲ ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۴ 📍 و رتبه ۱ کل دکترا ژنتیک پزشکی ۱۴۰۴ ✅ اگر میخوای رتبه برتر سال آینده باشی همین الان پیام بده ... @faragen_admin
Channel name was changed to «🧬 اِمِری پلاس (فراژنوم) ژنتیک پزشکی»
✅ نمونه جزوه استراکن مولکولی 💯 آپدیت شده به سوالات ارشد و دکتری 1405 🔰 پوشش دهی کامل هر دو جلد کتاب 💯تمام این جزوه در 270 صفحه آماده شده. سفارش: @faragen_admin
✅ نمونه جزوه تامپسون و جرد 2026 💯 آپدیت شده به سوالات ارشد و دکتری 1405 🔰 پوشش دهی کامل کتاب تامپسون و جر 2026 💯تمام این جزوه در 240 صفحه آماده شده. سفارش: @faragen_admin
❤2
✅ نمونه جزوه امری ویرایش 1405 💯 آپدیت شده به سوالات ارشد و دکتری 1405 🔰 پوشش دهی کامل کتاب امری با گزیده نکاتی از سایر منابع 💯تمام این جزوه در 350 صفحه آماده شده. سفارش: @faragen_admin
📍 زمان انتشار نتایج اولیه آزمون دکتری تخصصی علوم پزشکی ۱۴۰۵ اعلام شد 📌وزارت بهداشت اعلام کرد: نتایج اولیه آزمون دکتری تخصصی (Ph.D) و پژوهشی رشته های علوم پایه پزشکی، بهداشت و تخصصی، داروسازی و دندانپزشکی دی ماه اعلام خواهد شد.
❤3
✅ ویرایش ۱۴۰۵ جزوات به همراه تست های ارشد و دکتری امسال آماده شد ...
🧬 اِمِری پلاس ➕ژنتیک پزشکی pinned «⬅️ خلاصه ای از نتایج ۵ سال اخیر جزوات امری پلاس 📍رتبه ۱ کل ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۹۹ 📍 رتبه ۱ کل ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۲ 📍 رتبه ۱ دکترا وزارت علوم سال ۱۴۰۲ 📍 رتبه ۱ سهمیه ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۳ 📍 رتبه کل ۲ ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۴ 📍 و رتبه ۱ کل دکترا…»
⬅️ خلاصه ای از نتایج ۵ سال اخیر جزوات امری پلاس 📍رتبه ۱ کل ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۹۹ 📍 رتبه ۱ کل ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۲ 📍 رتبه ۱ دکترا وزارت علوم سال ۱۴۰۲ 📍 رتبه ۱ سهمیه ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۳ 📍 رتبه کل ۲ ارشد ژنتیک پزشکی سال ۱۴۰۴ 📍 و رتبه ۱ کل دکترا ژنتیک پزشکی ۱۴۰۴ ✅ پکیج کامل ارشد و پکیج کامل دکتری ژنتیک پزشکی موجود هست ... تا پایان هفته با تخفیف ویژه تهیه کنید. 📌 اگر میخوای رتبه برتر سال آینده باشی همین…
❤4
سوال 32- در تکثیر کل ژنوم تکسلولی، کدام روش زیر دارای پوشش ژنوم زیاد و حداقل amplification bias است؟
- الف) DOP-PCR16%
- ب) MALBAC40%
- ج) MDA12%
- د) LAMP32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سوال 31- پدیدهای که در آن بر اثر یک جهش معکوس به وضعیت طبیعی، میزان سلولهای نرمال نسبت به جهش یافته بیشتر شده و از مزیت رشد بیشتری برخوردار شوند چه مینامند؟
- الف) Advantage heterozygotic16%
- ب) Revertant Mosaicism40%
- ج) Back mutation40%
- د) Fitness4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @EmeryPlus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@EmeryPlus edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @EmeryPlus as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 22 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 29 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
سوال 32- در تکثیر کل ژنوم تکسلولی، کدام روش زیر دارای پوشش ژنوم زیاد و حداقل amplification bias است؟
- الف) DOP-PCR16%
- ب) MALBAC40%
- ج) MDA12%
- د) LAMP32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سوال 31- پدیدهای که در آن بر اثر یک جهش معکوس به وضعیت طبیعی، میزان سلولهای نرمال نسبت به جهش یافته بیشتر شده و از مزیت رشد بیشتری برخوردار شوند چه مینامند؟
- الف) Advantage heterozygotic16%
- ب) Revertant Mosaicism40%
- ج) Back mutation40%
- د) Fitness4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سوال 30- دامیک از روشهای زیر از ترانسپوزاز جهش یافته Tn5 استفاده میشود؟
- الف) FAIRE11%
- ب) ATAC65%
- ج) ChIA-PET16%
- د) TALEN8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سوال 29- در بیماری، تغییر ساختاری بزرگ در ژنوم با روش sequencing معمولی بهخوبی شناسایی نشده است. کدام ویژگی میتواند توضیحدهنده محدودیت روش باشد؟
- الف) تغییر در تعداد یا آرایش قطعات DNA بدون تغییر در بسیاری از بازهای منفرد46%
- ب) تغییر codon بدون تغییر طول DNA11%
- ج) وجود تنها یک SNP در Coding region29%
- د) وجود یک Synonymous variant14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سوال 28- تست کنکور دکتری 1405: فعالیت سیستم Deadenylation-dependent decapping به چه صورت است؟
- الف) بازسازی ریبوزومها حین تقسیم سلولی13%
- ب) بازسازی mRNAهای انتقالی از هسته به سیتوپلاسم13%
- ج) تخریب فرگمنت DNA حاصل از تقسیم سلولی15%
- د) تخریب mRNAهای بدون خواستگاه تبدیل به پروتئین59%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سوال 27- عملکرد Degradosome در فرآیند Exonucleases چیست؟
- الف) ساختار hairpin را در انتهای 3' باز میکند.54%
- ب) مانع از عملکرد اگزونوکلئاز میشود.20%
- ج) در یوکاریوتها عملکردی مشابه با باکتریها دارد.6%
- د) به عنوان ring proteins در ریبونوکلئاز عمل مینماید.20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@tabadllist · 47510 postsشیواپیروانی
@shivapeyrovani01 · 2004 postsجزوات استخدامی علوم آزمایشگاهی
@Laboratory_handouts · 9,9941 postفروش ویژه جزوات و کتب و کلاس های وزارت بهداشت
@ProfessorsBooklet · 8,4351 postاخبار کنکورهای وزارت بهداشت/استخدامی🍀🌸
@akhbareestekhdamiha · 7,4451 postSigmaLab | کنترل کیفی آزمایشگاه و هماتولوژی
@sigmalab_qc · 3161 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@drfarhood_academy · 1,9321 postآکادمی ایمونولوژی گاما
@Gamma_Immunology · 3,1101 postImmunoInsights
@Immuno_Insights · 6,0311 postIran Biotech House
@irbiotechhouse · 1,3381 postتقویت رزومه 🗣
@ketabmaghalee · 2,5751 postدانستنی های آزمایشگاهی ،بهداشتی و پزشکی
@Labmlc · 4,0101 postجزوات استخدامی علوم آزمایشگاهی
@Laboratory_handouts · 9,9941 postکاریابی علوم پزشکی کشور
@medicalniazmandiha · 21,9291 postفروش ویژه جزوات و کتب و کلاس های وزارت بهداشت
@ProfessorsBooklet · 8,4351 post🎯 رابین ویژن | تقویت رزومه | دکتری اپلای 🎯
@robin_vision · 3,2161 postSababiomedicals | فلوسایتومتری
@SabaFlow · 8,6871 postSciBridge Academy موسسه علمی پژوهشی
@scibridge_academy · 3,8631 postSefidpoushaneiran1
@sefidpoushaneiran1 · 1,4581 postThe ABCs of Immunology™
@The_ABCs_of_Immunology · 6,5321 postWikigene
@WIKI1GENE · 7,2161 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bbioka · 9,5942 postsنکات هماتولوژی
@hematologyhub · 1,0002 postsگروه استخدامی علوم آزمایشگاهی
@azemayeshgahi · 11,8911 postDr_Farhud_Academy
@drfarhood_academy · 1,9321 postImmunoInsights
@Immuno_Insights · 6,0311 postIran Biotech House
@irbiotechhouse · 1,3381 postتقویت رزومه 🗣
@ketabmaghalee · 2,5751 postدانستنی های آزمایشگاهی ،بهداشتی و پزشکی
@Labmlc · 4,0101 postجزوات استخدامی علوم آزمایشگاهی
@Laboratory_handouts · 9,9941 postکاریابی علوم پزشکی کشور
@medicalniazmandiha · 21,9291 post⭐️ سلولی ملکولی | دکتر مهدوی⭐️
@Mj_mahdavi97 · 7,1941 postکانال تخصصی نانو تکنولوژی پزشکی
@nanoochannel · 6,0281 postفروش ویژه جزوات و کتب و کلاس های وزارت بهداشت
@ProfessorsBooklet · 8,4351 post🎯 رابین ویژن | تقویت رزومه | دکتری اپلای 🎯
@robin_vision · 3,2161 postSababiomedicals | فلوسایتومتری
@SabaFlow · 8,6871 postSciBridge Academy موسسه علمی پژوهشی
@scibridge_academy · 3,8631 postSefidpoushaneiran2
@sefidpoushaneiran2 · 4761 postSefidpoushaneiran3
@sefidpoushaneiran3 · 1311 postSefidpoushaneiran4
@sefidpoushaneiran4 · 1421 postSefidpoushaneiran6
@sefidpoushaneiran6 · 1611 postSefidpoushaneiran5
@sefipoushaneiran5 · 1331 postThe ABCs of Immunology™
@The_ABCs_of_Immunology · 6,5321 postWikigene
@WIKI1GENE · 7,2161 post🔬 پایگاه آزمایشگاهی ایران
@wwwlabworldir · 11,4201 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@EmeryPlus named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 6 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arabbioma · 20,433
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
@Dr_abarghooi · 20,570
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
@medicallanguage · 20,499
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
@Drmohajernia_Eng_Acdmy · 21,342
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
@LabTel · 29,022
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧬 اِمِری پلاس ➕ژنتیک پزشکی” (@EmeryPlus), 9,626 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EmeryPlus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.