Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

EMERVEILLERT, OPEN ( .. 𖤝 .. )

@Emerveillert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,397subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001852529424
TypeChannel
Username@Emerveillert
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Emerveillert

Growth

1,39711 Aug 2026, 06:31 — 1,397 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:53 — 1,397 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 06:3111 Aug 2026, 16:53
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,396–1,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:531,397no change
11 Aug 2026, 06:311,397first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2025 to 22 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Apr 2025, 03:02 UTC508 viewsread 11 August 2026

ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ“To the moments we cherish, ㅤㅤwoven in time’s gentle embrace.” WE CELEBRATE THIS BOND, A STORY (&.) STILL UNFOLDING.ㅤㅤㅤ Today is a day of joy, a reminder of how far @ArcticEnt @SanJuniipero and @Jujutsukairent has come a journey filled with warmth, dedication, and unwavering togetherness. May this milestone be a gateway to even greater achievements, boundless happiness, and treasured memories yet to com

21 Apr 2025, 04:30 UTC330 viewsread 11 August 2026

ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ“To the moments we cherish, ㅤㅤwoven in time’s gentle embrace.” WE CELEBRATE THIS BOND, A STORY (&.) STILL UNFOLDING.ㅤㅤㅤ Today is a day of joy, a reminder of how far @ghouuls @BilliardEnt @dinosaurent and @Curiousrent has come a journey filled with warmth, dedication, and unwavering togetherness. May this milestone be a gateway to even greater achievements, boundless happiness, and treasured memories yet

21 Apr 2025, 04:20 UTC223 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Oh iya yaa.. selamat memperingati Hari Kartini jugaa. 🤍

2

21 Apr 2025, 04:18 UTC223 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Selamat siang, Vilys! Selamat hari Senin dan semangat menjalankan aktivitas hari ini dan untuk seminggu kedepan (5 hari lagi weekend kok hehehe).

3

16 Mar 2025, 14:48 UTC444 viewsread 11 August 2026

Hello @durov i would like to convey that, there is no action that violates the terms and conditions of telegram here, i hope, telegram has a wise way, in managing problems, before doing strict action, such as banning/blocking a telegram channel, thank you

16 Mar 2025, 14:47 UTC425 viewsread 11 August 2026

For @telegram, please don't ban this channel. this channel is still active and there is no problem, please don't report. Thank you @Durov.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Emerveillert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 806,707 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EMERVEILLERT, OPEN ( .. 𖤝 .. )” (@Emerveillert), 1,397 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Emerveillert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.