Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net +19,465. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,250–41,606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 08:00
38,680
+967
16 Sept 2026, 04:41
37,713
-177
14 Sept 2026, 14:40
37,890
-90
13 Sept 2026, 00:39
37,980
-123
11 Sept 2026, 03:57
38,103
+156
8 Sept 2026, 03:37
37,947
+1,519
5 Sept 2026, 01:57
36,428
+61
3 Sept 2026, 08:47
36,367
+209
2 Sept 2026, 02:26
36,158
-290
1 Sept 2026, 05:36
36,448
+406
31 Aug 2026, 08:12
36,042
+1,008
30 Aug 2026, 11:11
35,034
+2,186
29 Aug 2026, 11:04
32,848
+1,004
28 Aug 2026, 09:28
31,844
+169
27 Aug 2026, 06:25
31,675
+222
26 Aug 2026, 07:25
31,453
+242
25 Aug 2026, 07:32
31,211
+40
24 Aug 2026, 09:38
31,171
+1,012
22 Aug 2026, 18:16
30,159
+1,457
21 Aug 2026, 10:15
28,702
first reading
Engagement
162 posts held, back to 23 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.3%
avg views ÷ 38,680 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,900
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.482%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
122
of 162 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
162 (23 August 2025 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
1,573,400
Reactions total
7,581
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
37
Videos
28
Links
50
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
59m 03s
Average length
19m 41s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,639 reactions across 162 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,200
53.3%
👍
3,013
25.9%
💔
691
5.94%
🤣
660
5.67%
🔥
447
3.84%
👀
253
2.17%
👏
205
1.76%
😍
60
0.516%
🆒
51
0.438%
🏆
22
0.189%
🙏
15
0.129%
🥰
12
0.103%
💯
10
0.086%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 162 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,639 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2025 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دکتر درود
خسته نباشید
وقتی صحبت های بچه ها میبینم کیف میکنم
هم لول بالان هم آگاه
یک جاهای هم دلم میسوزه
چرا؟
چون هم فضای آموزشی کشور خیلی علاقه ها رو به فنا داده
هم خانواده ها هنوز دید سنتی خودشون رو حفظ کردن
کاش زمان ما هم همین قدر آگاه سازی بود
یکی بود بهمون جرات می داد که الان معلم نباشیم
معلم بودن بد نیست ولی با حقوق ۱۸۷۰۰ زندگی کردن اونم منی که رتبه ۱۵۰۰ سال ۹۷ بودم
دو جا رفتم مشاوره انتخاب رشته دریغ از یک درص…
دکتر من حس خاصی به رشته ها ندارم
عشق ساینس و مهندسی و با سواد شدن هستم
با دروس ریاضی فیزیک شیمی هم مشکلی ندارم
دوست دارم بتونم کار اثرگذار معنی دار انجام بدم
تو یه حوزه ای ورود کنم و کمپانی خودمو داشته باشم
و حس می کنم از شریف میگذره
می خواستم رشته های دریا و انرژی و مواد و ... شریف رو هم بزنم
چون معرفی رشته هارو که دیدم واقعا هر کدوم جذابیت خاص خودشو داره که میتونم پیداش کنم
موافق هستین دانشگاه رو بذارم اولویت ؟
بهمنی جان بچت جواب منو بده
آخر هفته میخوایم با خانواده بریم مسافرت الان که شما میگی نتایج پنجشنبه یا جمعه میاد ما دست نگه داشتیم
به خدا پیر شدیم میتونی بگی نتایج تا جمعه میدن یا نه
دکتر منم سینما و بازیگری دوست دارم مطمئن ام اگه میرفتم هنر زیر ۱۰۰ میشدم
وقتی نهم بودم با وجود معدل ۲۰ ام تقریبا همه مشاوره ها مخالفت کردن
که برم هنر
الانم تو تجربی خوشحال نیستم واقعا:)))))
✅|◀️فکت تلخ بعدی: آموزش عالی و دبیرستانی ما خیلی عقب مونده از بازار، نیازها و واقعیتها... برای همین الزاما تاریخ خوندن توی دانشگاه پاسخ نیاز و علاقه شما نیست...
✅|◀️چقدر تلخ بود... خب یه چیزی بهت بگم. تاریخ به صورت آکادمیک شاید به اون جذابی که فکر میکنی نباشه... بنظرم یه دانشگاه خوب قبول شو یه رشته دیگه با تاریخ ماینور یا کهاد کن یا سر کلاس اساتید خفن برو ... برای تاریخ خوندن و دونستن نیازی نیست توی دانشگاه بخونیش الزاما.
من نمیدونم چی بگم..😭
من به شدت علاقه به تاریخ دارم و بالا و پایین برم همین رشته رو میخوام
همه میگن ایندهای ندارم، یعنی حتی مامان بابام هم میگن خارج از ایران هم بری باز هیچ ایندهای تو این رشته نداری و بدرد نخور هست و تو گوگل هم میتونی تاریخ رو بخونی🙂. ولی من واقعا دوستش دارم. یعنی دوست داشتم یک روزی استاد این رشته باشم که شدنش صفر هست. خیلی سخت هست این موضوع که علاقت هیچ ایندهای نداشته باشه ولی نتونی دست از سرش ب…
✅|◀️اینو برای بچه های انتخاب رشته میگیم چون با اکسل المپیادی ها رو چک کنیم و تحلیل و داستان داره.
❤11💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @ElprofessorEdu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
#نظرسنجی | حالا که پرونده پزشکی تقریبا بسته شد بریم سراغ کدوم رشته؟
دندانپزشکی38%
داروسازی29%
فیزیوتراپی32%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2025 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انتخاب رشته [دکتر بهمنی]” (@ElprofessorEdu), 38,680 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ElprofessorEdu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.