Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for $ElonHair on Sol πŸš€πŸ’°

Channel

$ElonHair on Sol πŸš€πŸ’°

@Elonhair

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002600883162
TypeChannel
Username@Elonhair
DescriptionWe are in the debate about what is happening with Elon Musk hair, will he go bald?πŸ§πŸ’‡πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 23 May 2025 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Elonhair

Growth

97 August 2026 β€” 9 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 9 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:039no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:049first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
17
Videos
1
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀1640.0%
πŸ”₯1435.0%
🐳410.0%
πŸ‘37.50%
πŸ‘12.50%
🀣12.50%
πŸ₯°12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 18 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2025, 12:28 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

PLAN B is not a backup. It’s the real operation. https://x.com/planbmafia/status/1935144996371390856?s=46&t=f7Bg6rTmwGyoWElMUlrsqw 😎 SMASH THAT LIKE AND RT 🎹

πŸ”₯1

25 May 2025, 15:20 UTC68 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

πŸ’ŽπŸ˜‚πŸ’ŽπŸ˜‚πŸ’Ž

❀7

24 May 2025, 20:34 UTC98 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐳Our only objective is clear: πŸ’ŽGrow our community and be people who love our project πŸ’ŽGetting new holders to arrive πŸ’ŽGrow our graph to reach more people and go viral πŸ’ŽReach 1M Market Cap πŸ’ŽReaching Elon Musk ears πŸ’ŽAchieve an all-time high of at least 30M Market Cap πŸš€πŸŒ”If we join together in this project, we will all achieve it together πŸŒ”πŸš€

πŸ‘2🐳1πŸ”₯1

24 May 2025, 12:40 UTC118 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Good morning bald community! πŸ˜‚ We will conquer the universe πŸš€ πŸ³πŸ’Ž This is the new gem everyone will be talking about this week πŸ’ŽπŸ³ πŸ’Ž$ElonHair πŸ’Ž #BaldToTheMoon πŸŽ―πŸš€

❀2

24 May 2025, 06:20 UTC108 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

πŸ’Ž We have a new logo πŸ’Ž

❀1

24 May 2025, 05:57 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Patience rewards πŸ’Ž We have a great narrative. The whales will be here soon, guys, let's support $ElonHair πŸ’Ž It will be the new gem of 2025 πŸ’ŽπŸš€

🐳1πŸ‘1

24 May 2025, 04:01 UTC101 viewsread 12 August 2026

Let's all go together! It's time. Let's hold πŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸš€πŸ³πŸ³πŸ³

24 May 2025, 03:37 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Come on now guys let's make every hair on Elon's head count! πŸ”₯πŸš€

❀1πŸ”₯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Elonhair. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 May 2025, 00:01 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

While we wait, let's do a survey 🀣 Do you think Elon Musk's hair is real or an implant? The guy looks like he's going bald hahaha πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  1. Real πŸ’‡πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ67%
  2. Implant 🧐33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 18 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œ$ElonHair on Sol πŸš€πŸ’°β€ (@Elonhair), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Elonhair.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.