Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elite Class Binary by (EarnwithRashid & AliTheCounselor) πŸ«±πŸ½β€πŸ«²πŸΏ OT Brothers ☝🏻πŸ”₯

Channel

Elite Class Binary by (EarnwithRashid & AliTheCounselor) πŸ«±πŸ½β€πŸ«²πŸΏ OT Brothers ☝🏻πŸ”₯

@EliteClassBinary

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

38,777subscribers

+3,481 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002475564994
TypeChannel
Username@EliteClassBinary
Descriptionhttps://telegra.ph/Risk-Disclaimer---Please-Read-Before-You-Trade-06-15 ⚠️ Educational Content Only. Not Financial Advice & Not Responsible of Any Outcomes.Trading Carries Risk 18+. Support: @eliteclassteam @earnwithrashidmanager @teamearnwithrashid
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EliteClassBinary

Growth

35,29638,77737,036.57 August 2026 β€” 35,296 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 35,296 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 35,346 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 35,504 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 35,628 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 35,717 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 35,884 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 35,980 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 36,092 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 36,270 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 36,342 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 36,598 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 36,888 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 37,171 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 37,512 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 37,781 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 38,017 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 38,195 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 38,306 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 38,419 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 38,579 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 38,777 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3,481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,774–39,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 22:0538,777+198
29 Aug 2026, 18:4738,579+160
28 Aug 2026, 18:0538,419+113
27 Aug 2026, 20:2538,306+111
26 Aug 2026, 17:5638,195+178
25 Aug 2026, 21:0738,017+236
24 Aug 2026, 19:5637,781+269
23 Aug 2026, 03:0737,512+341
21 Aug 2026, 12:2737,171+283
20 Aug 2026, 13:5636,888+290
19 Aug 2026, 13:1236,598+256
18 Aug 2026, 14:5436,342+72
17 Aug 2026, 15:0836,270+178
16 Aug 2026, 06:2836,092+112
14 Aug 2026, 14:5635,980+96
13 Aug 2026, 05:5735,884+167
12 Aug 2026, 04:3635,717+89
10 Aug 2026, 09:4035,628+124
9 Aug 2026, 07:5135,504+158
8 Aug 2026, 07:5435,346first reading

Engagement

522 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
7.33%
avg views Γ· 38,777 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
522 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.14%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
522
of 522 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held522 (7 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total1,482,877
Reactions total61,462
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ3,920
Videos
β‰ˆ1
Links
β‰ˆ167

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

61,462 reactions across 522 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀46,50775.7%
πŸ’―3,0074.89%
πŸ‘2,7204.43%
πŸ†2,0083.27%
πŸ—Ώ1,0101.64%
πŸ”₯8801.43%
πŸ€—7691.25%
🫑6441.05%
πŸ’˜6351.03%
πŸŽ‰5370.874%
πŸ’‹4730.77%
πŸ†’3260.53%
πŸ₯°2830.46%
πŸ‘2460.4%
😘2350.382%
❀‍πŸ”₯2070.337%
😍1710.278%
⚑1620.264%
✍1470.239%
🀩1390.226%
5 further kinds3560.579%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 522 of the 522 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 61,462reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 522 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 522 we hold a reading for Β· 0.4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @EliteClassBinary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 522 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC670 views244 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Assalamualikum Brothers And Sisters ❀️ Good Morning πŸŒ„

❀198πŸ‘16πŸ’―11🫑6πŸ€—5πŸ₯°4πŸ†2⚑1

30 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTCβ‰ˆ3,130 views274 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @EarnwithRashidChannelVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❀231πŸ’―21πŸ₯°12πŸ†’6πŸ‘2πŸ”₯2

30 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTCβ‰ˆ3,060 views263 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @EarnwithRashidChannelVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❀226πŸ’―12πŸ₯°8πŸ‘7πŸ’˜5😎3πŸ€—2

30 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTCβ‰ˆ3,030 views286 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @EarnwithRashidChannelVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❀244πŸ’―18πŸ₯°14πŸ‘6πŸ’˜3πŸ†1

30 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTCβ‰ˆ3,420 views299 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @EarnwithRashidChannelPhoto

πŸ€‘ FOREX β€” WEEKLY REPORT MON: 02 Trades +270 Pips TUE: 01 Trade +200 Pips WED: 02 Trades -20 Pips THU: 02 Trades +145 Pips FRI: 02 Trades +55 Pips ACCURACY: 87.5% πŸ”₯ Winning Pips: +725–730 ⚑️⚑️ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ πŸ€‘ BINARY β€” WEEKLY RESULTS MON: Trades 24 | Wins 20 | Loss 04 TUE: Trades 15 | Wins 15 | Loss 00 WED: Trades 24 | Wins 20 | Loss 04 THU: Trades 28 | Wins 22 | Loss 06 FRI: Trades 15 | Wins 14 | Loss 01 SAT:…

❀234πŸ’―22πŸ‘14πŸ”₯6🍾5πŸ€—5❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸŽ‰3

30 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTCβ‰ˆ4,750 views511 reactions5 Starsread 31 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❀406πŸ‘46πŸ’‹13😍13πŸ₯°7πŸ†6🍾5😎5

29 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTCβ‰ˆ6,160 views589 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Sessions Are Not Provided On Sundays. Enjoy Your Weekend With Your Friends & Family ❀️

❀455πŸ‘52πŸ’‹22🫑12πŸ€—10πŸ₯°9πŸ”₯8πŸŽ‰7

29 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTCβ‰ˆ6,880 views361 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❀263πŸ’―35πŸ‘22🫑10πŸ’‹7🍾5πŸ”₯5πŸŽ‰4

29 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTCβ‰ˆ6,780 views186 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❀145πŸ‘16πŸ’―6πŸ”₯5πŸ†4🫑4πŸ‘3😘2

29 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTCβ‰ˆ6,440 views173 reactionsread 31 August 2026

EVENING LIVE SESSION RESULTS πŸ† 1. USCRUDE-OTC βœ… 2. USDJPY-OTC βœ… TOTAL SIGNALS: 02 WIN: 02 LOSS: 0

❀135πŸ’―9πŸ’‹8❀‍πŸ”₯6πŸ—Ώ5πŸ”₯4😘3🍾2

29 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTCβ‰ˆ6,200 views236 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Sure Shotβœ…

❀175πŸ’―14πŸ†13πŸ”₯11πŸ’‹9πŸ‘5πŸ†’4πŸ₯°3

29 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTCβ‰ˆ5,840 views182 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❀142πŸ’―15πŸ”₯10❀‍πŸ”₯5πŸ†3πŸŽ‰2πŸ’‹2🍾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 522 posts we hold for @EliteClassBinary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions β€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTCAnonymous Poll1,490 voters approx.

Vote Wisely

  1. Can We Double The Account In One Month?70%
  2. Can We Grow The Account By 50% In One Month?37%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 522 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 189,436 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œElite Class Binary by (EarnwithRashid & AliTheCounselor) πŸ«±πŸ½β€πŸ«²πŸΏ OT Brothers ☝🏻πŸ”₯” (@EliteClassBinary), 38,777 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EliteClassBinary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.