NUEVO CANAL DE CONTENIDO BDSM. π https://t.me/+RCZxKreqMNwzZjAx
β€22π₯°5

Channel
@El_Imperio_Del_Porno
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
3,017subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001949854220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @El_Imperio_Del_Porno |
| Created | 28 July 2023 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/El_Imperio_Del_Porno |
Adult β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:42 | 3,017 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 3,016 | -11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 3,027 | +12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:24 | 3,015 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 3,010 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 3,006 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 3,002 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 3,009 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 3,005 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 3,007 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 2,998 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 2,999 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 2,997 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 2,997 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 28 July 2023 β the reader has reached the start of this channelβs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
706 reactions across 5 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 220 | 31.2% | |
| β€ | 165 | 23.4% | |
| π₯ | 75 | 10.6% | |
| π₯° | 57 | 8.07% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 41 | 5.81% | |
| π | 27 | 3.82% | |
| π | 22 | 3.12% | |
| π | 20 | 2.83% | |
| π | 18 | 2.55% | |
| π― | 15 | 2.12% | |
| π | 12 | 1.70% | |
| π | 11 | 1.56% | |
| π | 10 | 1.42% | |
| πΎ | 7 | 0.992% | |
| π | 3 | 0.425% | |
| π | 2 | 0.283% | |
| π€© | 1 | 0.142% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2023 to 1 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NUEVO CANAL DE CONTENIDO BDSM. π https://t.me/+RCZxKreqMNwzZjAx
β€22π₯°5
Sticker, posted without a caption
β€51π₯11π3
π π π π π π π π π π π π π β‘οΈ πΎπ€π‘π€π’ππππ£ππ¨ πππ‘π©π§ππππ¨ π¨π΄ β‘οΈ Mia Khalifa +18𫦠π₯ Michelle Rabbit +18π π₯TRANS +18π π« Kelly Apraez +18𫦠π« Gaby Gardez +18π π« EspaΓ±olas πͺπΈ Calientes 𫦠π ππππππ HOTβ€οΈβπ₯
β€61π₯°10π8π₯7π7π2π2π2
| πMODELOS TOPπ | β‘οΈ Karely Ruiz β‘οΈ Catherine β‘οΈ Mika Lafuente β‘οΈ Belle Delphine β‘οΈ Hannah OwO | π₯CANALES TOP π₯ | β‘οΈ Solo anales β‘οΈ CONTENIDO BDSM β‘οΈ ExhibiciΓ³n en PΓΊblico β‘οΈ AsiΓ‘ticas Calientes β‘οΈ Lesbianas Hot β‘οΈ MUNDO DEL SEXO β‘οΈ XXX PROHIBIDO β‘οΈ COSPLAY +18 β‘οΈ HENTAI HOT β‘οΈ MADURAS CALIENTES β‘οΈ TRIOS Y ORGIAS β‘οΈ GARGANTAS PROFUNDAS β‘οΈ INTERRACIALES βΆοΈΓNETE A TODOS LOS CANALES AQUIβ¬οΈ β¦
π167π₯48π₯°28π22β€βπ₯19π18π18π―15
π π π π π π π π π π π π π π π π Mediante este canal podrΓ‘s acceder a La mejor recompilaciΓ³n de canales para adultos +18π₯ de Telegram.
π45β€31β€βπ₯22π₯°14π11π10π₯9πΎ7
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @El_Imperio_Del_Porno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@El_Imperio_Del_Porno named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ’π₯ππ§ππ€ πΏππ‘ ππ€π§π£π€β (@El_Imperio_Del_Porno), 3,017 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/El_Imperio_Del_Porno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.