Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Ÿ‘‘ุจุงุจุง ุงู„ู…ุฌุงู„ ๐Ÿ‘‘

Channel

๐Ÿ‘‘ุจุงุจุง ุงู„ู…ุฌุงู„ ๐Ÿ‘‘

@Egypt1xpro

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Cite this entry

6,224subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002053649753
TypeChannel
Username@Egypt1xpro
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Egypt1xpro

Growth

6,2246,3286,2767 August 2026 โ€” 6,328 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 6,328 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 6,322 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 6,302 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 6,284 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 6,274 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 6,250 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 6,236 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 6,229 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 6,224 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 6,208โ€“6,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 09:286,224-5
27 Aug 2026, 05:576,229-7
24 Aug 2026, 14:226,236-14
20 Aug 2026, 17:366,250-24
17 Aug 2026, 16:356,274-10
14 Aug 2026, 14:166,284-18
11 Aug 2026, 00:216,302-20
8 Aug 2026, 07:506,322-6
7 Aug 2026, 12:166,328no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:086,328first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
22.0%
avg views รท 6,224 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (24 July 2026 โ€“ 12 August 2026)
Views total23,274
Reactions total317
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

411 reactions across 26 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค19246.7%
๐Ÿ”ฅ4911.9%
๐ŸŒš419.98%
๐Ÿ‘368.76%
๐Ÿพ235.60%
๐Ÿฅฐ235.60%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ143.41%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ81.95%
๐Ÿ‘€71.70%
๐Ÿ‘Œ30.73%
๐Ÿ‘30.73%
๐Ÿซก30.73%
โ˜ƒ20.487%
๐Ÿ™‰20.487%
โœ10.243%
๐Ÿ˜Ž10.243%
๐Ÿ™ˆ10.243%
๐Ÿ™Š10.243%
๐Ÿค10.243%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 411reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC730 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

29HHJ

โค13๐ŸŒš3๐Ÿ”ฅ2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

9 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC945 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ุชู… ุงู„ุฏูุน ู…ุจุฑูˆูˆูˆูƒ ุนู„ูŠูƒู… ูŠุงุฎูˆุงุชูŠ โœ…โœ…โœ…๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿ’ฐ

โค39๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿฅฐ4โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ‘Œ1

9 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTCโ‰ˆ1,040 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

3TTUF

โค5๐Ÿฅฐ3๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜ฑ1๐Ÿ™‰1

9 Aug 2026, 03:22 UTCโ‰ˆ1,020 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

UETUF

โค9๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿ™‰1

8 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTCโ‰ˆ1,220 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

LBN7D

โค8๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ‘1

8 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTCโ‰ˆ1,120 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

NMM7D

โค4๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ‘1

6 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTCโ‰ˆ1,370 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ˜”

๐Ÿ‘16โค12๐ŸŒš9๐Ÿ‘€5โœ1โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ™ˆ1

6 Aug 2026, 02:51 UTCโ‰ˆ1,610 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

H23FC

โค8๐ŸŒš3๐Ÿพ2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘Œ1

5 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTCโ‰ˆ1,590 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AJBMB

โค6๐ŸŒš4๐Ÿ”ฅ3

4 Aug 2026, 03:39 UTCโ‰ˆ1,710 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

URSU1

โค11๐ŸŒš6โ˜ƒ2๐Ÿ”ฅ2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿซก1

2 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTCโ‰ˆ2,130 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ZL46Y

โค13๐ŸŒš5๐Ÿฅฐ4๐Ÿ‘€2๐Ÿพ1๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜Ž1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Egypt1xpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ‘‘ุจุงุจุง ุงู„ู…ุฌุงู„ ๐Ÿ‘‘โ€ (@Egypt1xpro), 6,224 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Egypt1xpro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.