Channel
@Eema_Mbti
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,063subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001232724633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Eema_Mbti |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Eema_Mbti |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 1,063 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:08 | 1,068 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 1,069 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 1,068 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 1,070 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 1,077 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 1,079 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 1,077 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 1,079 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 1,078 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 1,077 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 1,077 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
53 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 43.4% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 26.4% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 15.1% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 7.55% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 7.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
« بزرگترین اشتباه تو دعوا با یک EXTJ😬 » #ENTJ #ESTJ بزرگترین اشتباه تو دعوا با یه EXTJ اینه که از احساساتتون به عنوان «دلیل موجه» استفاده کنید. اگر مدام گریه کنید، داد بزنید یا بخاید با مظلومنمایی بهشون عذاب وجدان بدین، نه تنها نرم نمیشن، که شما رو یه «موجود غیرمنطقی و غیرقابل اتکا» میبینن که حرف زدن باهاش به هیچ جا ختم نمیشه! با اونا شفاف، بدون حاشیه و با صدای محکم (اما نه پرخاشگرانه) صحبت کنید. اگر بهشون نشون…
👍7
هرتایپ چطوری خطرناک میشه؟😈 پارت سه: #ENTJ ⚛ به دلایل مختلف ENTJها میتونن دشمنای سرسخت و خوفناکی باشن. اونا توی بسیج کردن منابع و نظارت رو برنامه های پیچیده و چندوجهی محشرن؛ و این یعنی میتونن به سرعت روشهای فوق العاده کارآمدی رو برای نابودکردن کسی که فکر میکنن به درد نخور و فاسده پیدا، و به خوبی اجراشون کنن. قسمت زیبای ماجرا اینجاس که اگه ارزشهاشونو زیر پا بذارید، وقتشونو تلف کنید یا به عزیزانشون صدمه بزنید؛ احت…
👍1🤣1
از باورهای رایج تا دادههای آماری درمورد تایپ #ENFP🔭✨ @Eema_MBTI | شخصیت شناسی ایما
❤5
🎁🤩 هر تایپ چه چیزی رو بیشتر از #کادو دوس داره؟ برای ENTPها، هیجانِ یاد گرفتن یه چیز جدید معمولاً از گرفتن یه هدیه باحالتره! کنجکاوی اونا سیریناپذیره و عاشق کشف ایدهها، مفاهیم، احتمالات و نظریههای جدیدن. بنابراین فقط کافیه بفهمید این روزا به چی علاقهمندن، دربارهش حرف بزنین و با دقت گوش بدید؛ همین خودش از هر هدیهای براشون ارزشمندتره.👌🏻 چندتا پیشنهاد: •|💛|• تو ویکیپدیا یا یوتیوب دنبال حقایق جالب دربارهی آدم…
❤3
به خاطر همین قدرت ترکیبه که قرار نیست ویژگی های ما آدما حتی با وجود یکی بودن تایپمون (که "یکی" از میلیون ها مولفه شخصیته)، شبیه همدیگه باشه✋ بماند که حتی تو ترکیبِ مواد کاملا یکسان، یعنی مثلا از کیک به کیک هم زمین تا آسمون فرق هست بسته به اینکه - کی اونو میپزه و بهش شیپ میده (مثلا والدین) - از چه مقدار مواد و عناصر دیگه ای علاوه بر شکر تشکیل شده (مهارت ها و صفات دیگه فرد) - تو چه محیط و شرایطی قرار داره (تجارب…
👍5❤2
تو همه این خوراکی های خوشگلی که باهم دیدیم، عنصری به نام #شکر وجود داره . . اما طعم هیچ کدوم اینا باهم یکی نیست؛ هست؟ . . کسی هست هوس بستنی کنه، به جاش حلوا بخوره؟🙂 . .
👏4👍1
درس امروز قدرت ترکیبه!
کلاس آشپزی داریم😂
اهل بستنی نیستم ولی بهرحال اینم شیرینه😬
❤3
یا شربت آبلیمو🌱
❤3
شله زرد که موعدشم نزدیکه و... 🤤
❤4
. حلوا چه مزه ست؟ ☺️ .
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Eema_Mbti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایما | شخصیت شناسی MBTI” (@Eema_Mbti), 1,063 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eema_Mbti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.