Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Education intime 💘

Channel

Education intime 💘

@EducationIntime

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

49,039subscribers

-1,927 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001433638669
TypeChannel
Username@EducationIntime
DescriptionTu as plus de 18ans, homme ou femme, marié ou encore célibataire, grâce à ce canal tu vas apprendre plusieurs secrets pour ton éducation intime 😍 Pub 👉 https://telega.io/c/Educationintime
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/EducationIntime

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,03950,96650,002.57 August 2026 — 50,966 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,966 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,952 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,930 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,894 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,871 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,852 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,817 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,790 subscribers15 August 2026 — 50,729 subscribers17 August 2026 — 50,640 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,602 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,550 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,515 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,475 subscribers22 August 2026 — 50,428 subscribers23 August 2026 — 50,340 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,277 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,223 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,199 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,158 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,108 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,184 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,245 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,214 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,182 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,144 subscribers4 September 2026 — 50,076 subscribers7 September 2026 — 49,938 subscribers10 September 2026 — 49,800 subscribers12 September 2026 — 49,734 subscribers14 September 2026 — 49,655 subscribers16 September 2026 — 49,582 subscribers18 September 2026 — 49,486 subscribers1 October 2026 — 49,039 subscribers7 August 20261 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 55 days, net -1,927. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,750–51,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 15:4049,039-447
18 Sept 2026, 12:2249,486-96
16 Sept 2026, 03:5649,582-73
14 Sept 2026, 10:1949,655-79
12 Sept 2026, 19:3949,734-66
10 Sept 2026, 17:5649,800-138
7 Sept 2026, 16:2149,938-138
4 Sept 2026, 15:1950,076-68
3 Sept 2026, 00:3850,144-38
2 Sept 2026, 01:0350,182-32
1 Sept 2026, 03:0250,214-31
31 Aug 2026, 05:3750,245+61
30 Aug 2026, 05:5450,184+76
29 Aug 2026, 05:1350,108-50
28 Aug 2026, 07:1450,158-41
27 Aug 2026, 03:4450,199-24
26 Aug 2026, 05:3350,223-54
25 Aug 2026, 04:3850,277-63
23 Aug 2026, 23:5350,340-88
22 Aug 2026, 09:1350,428first reading

Engagement

197 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.35%
avg views ÷ 49,039 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,100
91 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
91
of 197 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 91 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held197 (1 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total372,780
Reactions total5,684
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,710
Videos
≈114
Links
≈836

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
59s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13,546 reactions across 191 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀7,88658.2%
👍2,35517.4%
😁1,50511.1%
🔥1,1048.15%
🀔1591.17%
🀝950.701%
💔780.576%
😍770.568%
👎700.517%
👀680.502%
👌330.244%
⚡270.199%
🥰200.148%
😢180.133%
🀩120.089%
🀷‍♂90.066%
🫡90.066%
🙏60.044%
🀯60.044%
🍌40.03%
3 further kinds50.037%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 192 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,546 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 197 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EducationIntime. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 197 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,400 views53 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

La libido aprÚs l'accouchement : que se passe-t-il ? "Je ne ressens aucun désir aprÚs avoir eu un bébé" : est-ce normal ? Oui. Et c'est trÚs courant. Voici les facteurs qui peuvent l'influencer : 🀱 Changements hormonaux La baisse de l'œstrogÚne et l'augmentation de la prolactine peuvent entraîner une diminution temporaire de la libido. 😎 Fatigue constante Les nouveau-nés ne dorment pas, et les parents non plus. U


👍30❀15🔥8

1 Oct 2026, 11:46 UTC≈2,080 views76 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Le couloir de la maison familiale est trop long. 👀

🀔57😁17❀2

30 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC≈2,960 views67 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Les hommes, laquelle est plus attirante ?

❀58👍9

29 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC≈3,470 views64 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Conseils pour faire l'amour pour la premiÚre fois ? (Nouveaux mariés)

❀56👍8

29 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,400 views2 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

🔥 𝗘𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗲 𝗱𝗲 𝗱é𝗰𝗌𝘂𝘃𝗿𝗶𝗿 𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝗜𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗳𝗌𝗿𝗺𝗲 𝗺𝗌𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲 𝗜𝗌𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗜𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗜𝗌𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘀 𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗷𝗲𝘂𝘅 ? ⚡ 𝗔𝘃𝗲𝗰 𝟭𝗪𝗜𝗡, 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗌𝘂𝘃𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗜é𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗌𝗺𝗜𝗹Ú𝘁𝗲, 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗜𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝘁 𝗱𝘆𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗟𝘂𝗲. 🎁 𝗖𝗌𝗱𝗲 𝗜𝗿𝗌𝗺𝗌 : 𝗚𝗡𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗊𝗣𝗥𝗢 ➡ https://lkpq.cc/184855 Code promo ⏩UNIVERSPRO🚀

❀2

28 Sept 2026, 16:57 UTC≈3,580 views80 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

LES ERREURS QUE LES HOMMES COMMETTENT AU LIT ☄Parfois, il ne s'agit pas d'apprendre de nouvelles choses, mais d'éviter les habitudes qui, discrÚtement, détruisent l'attirance. 👁🔥 🍀NE PAS ACCORDER ASSEZ DE TEMPS AUX PRÉLUDES Pour de nombreuses femmes, les préliminaires ne sont pas seulement un échauffement, mais une partie essentielle de l'intimité. Les bâcler ou les ignorer complÚtement peut laisser votre partenair


👍46❀27🔥7

28 Sept 2026, 11:56 UTC≈3,280 views60 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

❀ DÉBAT | Quel est, selon vous, le meilleur moyen pour rencontrer l’amour ?

❀58😍2

28 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,570 views4 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

🔥 𝗘𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗲 𝗱𝗲 𝗱é𝗰𝗌𝘂𝘃𝗿𝗶𝗿 𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝗜𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗳𝗌𝗿𝗺𝗲 𝗺𝗌𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲 𝗜𝗌𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗜𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗜𝗌𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘀 𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗷𝗲𝘂𝘅 ? ⚡ 𝗔𝘃𝗲𝗰 𝟭𝗪𝗜𝗡, 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗌𝘂𝘃𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗜é𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗌𝗺𝗜𝗹Ú𝘁𝗲, 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗜𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝘁 𝗱𝘆𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗟𝘂𝗲. 🎁 𝗖𝗌𝗱𝗲 𝗜𝗿𝗌𝗺𝗌 : 𝗚𝗡𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗊𝗣𝗥𝗢 ➡ https://lkpq.cc/184855 Code promo ⏩UNIVERSPRO🚀

👍3❀1

26 Sept 2026, 19:38 UTC≈4,580 views79 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Le saviez-vous ? Une relation à distance est avant tout basée sur la confiance. Quelles sont les autres astuces pour réussir une relation à distance ?

❀69👍7🔥3

26 Sept 2026, 18:59 UTC≈4,460 views7 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

On vend ou on attend ? Oui 🔥 non ❀

🫡6❀1

26 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC≈3,920 views49 reactionsread 2 October 2026

Les hommes, dites-nous franchement : comment savoir si une femme a couché avec un autre homme ? Quels sont les signes qui ne trompent pas ?

👍33❀10😁5🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈4,310 views1 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

🚀 𝗥𝗲𝗷𝗌𝗶𝗎𝗻𝗲𝘇 𝗱𝗲‌𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝟭𝘄𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗰 𝗹𝗲 𝗰𝗌𝗱𝗲 𝗜𝗿𝗌𝗺𝗌 𝗚𝗡𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗊𝗣𝗥𝗢 ! 💞 𝗗𝗲‌𝗜𝗌‌𝘁𝘀 = 𝟬 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗶𝘀 💰 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝘁𝘀 = 𝟬 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗶𝘀 ✅ 𝗩𝗌𝘂𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘃𝗲𝘇 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘃𝗌𝘁𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗎𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗰𝗌𝘂𝗜𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲‌𝗲 ! 🎁 𝗜𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘇-𝘃𝗌𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝘂𝗷𝗌𝘂𝗿𝗱’𝗵𝘂𝗶 𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗰 𝗹𝗲 𝗰𝗌𝗱𝗲 𝗜𝗿𝗌𝗺𝗌 𝗚𝗡𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗊𝗣𝗥𝗢 𝘀𝘂𝗿 𝟭𝘄𝗶𝗻 ! 🚚 Lien d'inscription : https://lkpq.cc/184855

❀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @EducationIntime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTCAnonymous Poll745 voters

Autoriserez-vous votre partenaire à jouer dans un film de relation amoureuse ?

  1. Oui15%
  2. Non85%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTCAnonymous Poll780 voters

Des gens ici ont peur d'aller au sexe ?

  1. Oui moi41%
  2. Pas moi59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Sept 2026, 07:44 UTCAnonymous Poll503 voters

Quelles sont les principales difficultés que vous rencontrez pour aborder ce sujet ?"

  1. Manque de confiance28%
  2. Peur des réactions40%
  3. Manque d'informations21%
  4. Autre (précisez)11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTCAnonymous Poll746 voters

Pensez-vous que les réseaux sociaux ont un impact positif ou négatif sur l'éducation intime ?

  1. Positif31%
  2. Négatif43%
  3. Ni l'un ni l'autre26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 20:31 UTCAnonymous Poll928 voters

Quels sujets aimeriez-vous voir abordés dans notre canal ?

  1. Consentement7%
  2. Santé sexuelle56%
  3. Relations amoureuses25%
  4. Identité de genre et orientation sexuelle12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTCAnonymous Poll696 voters

Quelle est votre méthode préférée pour aborder des sujets d'éducation intime ?

  1. ▪ A. Discussions en face à face73%
  2. ▪ B. Livres ou articles8%
  3. ▪ C. Vidéos ou podcasts11%
  4. ▪ D. Autre (précisez)7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

N’ZUI MANTO
@NZUIMANTO1 · 441,389
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Education intime 💘” (@EducationIntime), 49,039 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EducationIntime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.