Goodbye Orbin! Good riddance. Trump and Vance has no influence.
❤1❤🔥1

Channel
@EdKrassen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003595845628 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EdKrassen |
| Description | Standing for the future of America. Creator of @Krassen Cast. Subscribe for additional content. Follow my twin: @Krassenstein. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 3 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EdKrassen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 2 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 2 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 12 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Goodbye Orbin! Good riddance. Trump and Vance has no influence.
❤1❤🔥1
Does anyone really think Republicans have any shot at maintaining the majority without somehow cheating? The midterms look absolutely horrible for Trump and the GOP.
Fox Business News is acknowledging that Trump and Republicans are screwed for the midterms. “That’s not what Trump campaigned on for either of his presidencies.”
BREAKING: Trump is holding another corrupt dinner for the top 297 $TRUMP memecoin holders at Mar-a-Lago on on April 25, with the top VIPs getting. Special pre-dinner reception pass. This is literally “Pay to play.” It is unknown if Trump will make an appearance or not even though his website implies he will. We literally have corruption in plain sight, and Republicans are turning a blind eye because Trump can do an…
Trump seemingly just called for Venezuela to become the 51st state which would mean every Venezuelan becomes an American citizen. Didn’t he call them “rapists and murderers” and want to deport them all? I’m so confused.
BREAKING: Trump appointed Judge Aileen Cannon has just blocked the release of special counsel Jack Smith's report into Trump's alleged mishandling of classified documents. They are covering up the coverup!
BREAKING: Trump just posted this video of Mark Levin calling for him to attack Iran and facilitate regime change. He’s justifying what he’s about to do. After years of Republicans claiming they wanted no new wars, they are now going to justify Trump starting a new war.
BREAKING: AOC in Germany: “You are the Attorney General of the United States of America and you don't want to hold anyone of these pedophiles accountable? Resign or be impeached!"
GREAT News Patriots! The DOW has just dropped under 50,000. We can now ask Pam Bondi about Jeffrey Epstein.
HOLY SH-T - This is NOT AI. Trump yesterday: "I'm proud to officially name the... undishpu.. the... jshhhh... when did this come out? Can any medical experts weigh in on this mess? Is this some form of dementia or TIA, or was he just having a mental breakdown after Pam Bondi made a fool of herself while covering up the Epstein Files?
MAJOR BREAKING: The HIGHLY classified whistleblower complaint against Tulsi Gabbard stems from an intercepted conversation between two foreign nationals that referenced Jared Kushner and Iran. Those familiar with the material said the reference to Kushner intensified scrutiny because of his role in sensitive diplomatic efforts.
WOW! In 2017, Jeffrey Epstein said "Some at dinner with Donald last night were concerned about dementia. tons of makeup. did not recognize old friends."
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @EdKrassen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,158,634 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ed Krassenstein” (@EdKrassen), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EdKrassen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.