Binance has launched bStocks — tokenized versions of stocks like Apple and Tesla. ✅ Track stock prices ✅ 24/7 trading ✅ Easy global access But remember: ❌ Not real shares ❌ No voting rights ❌ No direct dividends ⚠️ You rely on Binance and its custodian to maintain the token's value. Interesting innovation, but it's not the same as owning actual stocks. 🚀📊

Channel
Eagle Titans
@Eagletitanscall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7,596subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003892750885 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Eagletitanscall |
| Description | https://linktr.ee/EagleTitans 🦅 Eagle Titans Official Channel 🚀 Web3 Growth & Crypto Marketing 🤝 Global KOL Network • Fundraising 📈 Strategic Partnerships & Community Growth 🌍 Powering the Next Generation of Web3 DM for collaboration: @RestuAdy |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 14 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Eagletitanscall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 7,596 | -39 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 7,635 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 7,637 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 7,637 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.01%
- avg views ÷ 7,596 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 457
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,112 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 147
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 107
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
The future of finance is simple: one app, one account, endless possibilities. From trading and staking to payments, Launchpad, and BNB Chain, Binance is building an all-in-one financial ecosystem. Less friction. Lower fees. More control. Would you trust one app with your entire financial life? 👇 Here Link #Binance #BNB
🤝 Official Partnership Announcement We are proud to announce the official partnership between CoinMarketCap and Eagle Titans. This collaboration marks an important milestone in our mission to accelerate Web3 growth through strategic marketing, stronger communities, and global visibility. Together, we are committed to supporting innovative blockchain projects, expanding industry connections, and creating greater op…
Channel photo updated
Gold and Silver Options. Now on Binance. A World First. @binance is the first crypto exchange to launch Commodity Options on Gold and Silver. Trade Gold and Silver options directly from your Binance account. USDT settled. No physical delivery needed. Maximum loss limited to the premium you pay. No liquidation risk on long positions. This is not a product looking for demand. Gold Perpetuals already hit $7.77 billi…
They start investing very young. 30% start while in university or early adulthood. Only 15% of Millennials did this at the same age. They also learn more about money. 77% of Gen Z had formal money education. This is the highest of any generation. People often think young investors take big risks. But the data says no. Only 5.9% of Gen Z’s trading uses leveraged ETFs. This is the lowest of any generation. On @bin…
El Gato Update The next leg for #ELGATO has officially begun. It now reached 300K market cap and chart continues to look incredibly strong. After a healthy consolidation around 100K MC, EL GATO went through several solid shakeouts that helped remove weak hands and significantly reduce the number of jeets.
The honest read on # $BTC and $ETH this weekend: the bottoming case is the strongest it has been in weeks. Bitcoin is grinding higher, a US reserve bill and an on-chain end-of-bear signal are fresh, whales are not selling, and sentiment is climbing off its lows. But it is still fear, the ETF bid has not fully returned, and $66,000 is unbroken. This is a market making the case for a bottom, and the Fed on July 29 is …
ETF FLOWS: US SPOT CRYPTO ETFs FLOWS DATA UPDATE (22-07-2026) YESTERDAY 🟩 Bitcoin ETFs: +1,047 $BTC (+$68.99M) 🟩 Ethereum ETFs: +37,730 $ETH (+$72.64M) 🟥 SOLANA ETFs: -16.4K $SOL (-$1.27M) 🟩 CHAINLINK ETFs: +310.30K $LINK (+$2.68M) 🟩 $XRP, $BNB, $AVAX, $DOT, $HBAR, $DOGE, $HYPE, $LTC Flows Was Zero. TOTAL US SPOT CRYPTO ETFs INFLOW: ≈ +$143.04M U.S. BITCOIN ETFs BOUGHT ~1,047 BTC Worth $68.99M 🇺🇸 BlackRock ETF Has…
Hi GM
Hi
Eagle Titans pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Eagletitanscall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 167,482 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Eagletitanscall named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eagle Titans” (@Eagletitanscall), 7,596 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eagletitanscall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.