Channel
@Eagle_Intel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,150subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002964389343 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Eagle_Intel |
| Description | Intel decoded by patriots, not politicians. Run by 11B minds and astute eyes. We don’t follow orders — we follow truth. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Eagle_Intel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 7,150 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 7,168 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 7,169 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 7,169 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (25 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,528 |
| Reactions total | 553 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
553 reactions across 30 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 198 | 35.8% | |
| ❤ | 92 | 16.6% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 9.76% | |
| 💯 | 47 | 8.50% | |
| ⚡ | 38 | 6.87% | |
| 🕊 | 18 | 3.25% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 2.71% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 2.53% | |
| 🤬 | 13 | 2.35% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 1.63% | |
| 😐 | 8 | 1.45% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 1.27% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 1.08% | |
| 💊 | 6 | 1.08% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.723% | |
| 👨💻 | 3 | 0.542% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.542% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.362% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.181% | |
| 13 further kinds | 13 | 2.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 553reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CAROLYN BERTOZZI: THE CHEMIST WHO MADE CELLS “CLICK” ⚗️🦅 Carolyn Bertozzi is an American chemist who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2022 for developing bioorthogonal chemistry — chemical reactions that can take place safely inside living organisms without disrupting normal biology. Her Real Achievement: Chemists can make molecules react in a laboratory. But inside a living cell, the challenge is far greater: tho…
🔥3👍2❤1🎉1💯1🕊1😨1
HENRIETTA LACKS: THE WOMAN WHOSE CELLS CHANGED MEDICINE FOREVER 🔬🦅 Henrietta Lacks is an African-American woman whose cancer cells — taken without her knowledge or consent in 1951 — became the first immortal human cell line in history. Known as HeLa cells, they have been used in thousands of scientific breakthroughs and have saved millions of lives. Her Real Achievement: Henrietta Lacks was not a scientist. She was a…
👍9❤4🎉2👻1💯1🕊1
FREDERICK SANGER: THE CHEMIST WHO READ THE LANGUAGE OF LIFE 🧬🦅 Frederick Sanger is a British biochemist who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry twice — in 1958 and 1980 — making him one of only four people in history to receive two Nobel Prizes. He developed methods to read the sequence of proteins and DNA, unlocking the language of life. His Real Achievement: Every protein and every gene is a sequence — a specific orde…
👍5⚡2😐2❤1💯1🔥1🤯1
LINUS PAULING: THE CHEMIST WHO DECODED THE CHEMICAL BOND ⚗️🦅 Linus Pauling is an American chemist who revolutionized our understanding of chemical bonding and molecular structure. He is the only person in history to win two unshared Nobel Prizes — in Chemistry (1954) and Peace (1962). His Real Achievement: How do atoms bond together to form molecules? What determines the shape of a molecule? How does molecular struct…
👍7🕊3❤2💯1
SHINYA YAMANAKA: THE SCIENTIST WHO TURNED BACK TIME IN CELLS 🧬🦅 Shinya Yamanaka is a Japanese physician and stem cell researcher who discovered how to reprogram adult cells back into a stem cell state — reversing the clock of development. He won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2012. His Real Achievement: For decades, scientists believed cell development was a one-way street. A skin cell is a skin cell fo…
👍5🔥3💯2❤1👀1🤯1😱1
ELIZABETH BLACKBURN: THE BIOLOGIST WHO DISCOVERED THE SECRET OF AGING 🧬🦅 Elizabeth Blackburn is an Australian-American molecular biologist who discovered telomeres and the enzyme telomerase — revealing a fundamental mechanism of aging and cancer. She won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2009. Her Real Achievement: Why do cells age? Why do they stop dividing after a certain number of times? Why does DNA no…
👍10❤8⚡1💯1🕊1🙏1
BARRY MARSHALL: THE DOCTOR WHO DRANK BACTERIA TO PROVE A POINT 🔬🦅 Barry Marshall is an Australian physician who discovered that stomach ulcers are caused by a bacterium — not by stress or spicy food as everyone believed. To prove it, he drank a solution of the bacteria himself. He won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2005. His Real Achievement: For decades, stomach ulcers were considered a lifestyle disea…
👍10💯4❤2💊2🔥1🗿1😐1
TU YOUYOU: THE SCIENTIST WHO FOUND A CURE IN ANCIENT TEXTS 💊🦅 Tu Youyou is a Chinese pharmaceutical chemist who discovered artemisinin — the most effective treatment for malaria in the world. She won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2015, becoming the first Chinese woman to receive a Nobel Prize in science. Her Real Achievement: Malaria kills hundreds of thousands of people every year, mostly children in …
⚡8❤4👍4💊2💯1🕊1🤝1
TIM BERNERS-LEE: THE ENGINEER WHO INVENTED THE WORLD WIDE WEB 🌐🦅 Tim Berners-Lee is a British computer scientist who invented the World Wide Web in 1989 — the system of interlinked documents and resources that transformed the internet into a global information space accessible to everyone. His Real Achievement: The internet existed before the Web — it was a network of computers that could exchange data. But accessing…
👍11⚡2❤2🔥2💯1🫡1😐1
🔻 THE PILOT WHO FLEW THE PODS: A 2022 CONFESSION 🔻 "I never knew what was inside the containers. For six years, I was told they were 'classified medical equipment for forward operating bases.' I flew them from a private airstrip in Nevada to 14 different locations across the continental United States. I never asked questions. Until the night one of the containers opened." ⟁ I was a contract cargo pilot for a logis…
👍12❤8🔥1
GRACE HOPPER: THE ADMIRAL WHO PROGRAMMED THE FUTURE 💻🦅 Grace Hopper is an American computer scientist and U.S. Navy Admiral who invented the first compiler — a program that translates human-readable code into machine language. She made computers accessible to ordinary people and changed programming forever. Her Real Achievement: In the early days of computing, programming meant writing in binary code — long strings o…
👍10❤7⚡1👨💻1💯1🕊1🙏1
ADA LOVELACE: THE MATHEMATICIAN WHO IMAGINED THE COMPUTER 💻🦅 Ada Lovelace is a British mathematician who wrote the world's first computer algorithm — nearly 100 years before computers existed. She is widely regarded as the first computer programmer in history. Her Real Achievement: In the 1840s, the concept of a programmable machine was barely imaginable. Yet Ada Lovelace not only understood Charles Babbage's propose…
👍9🙏3⚡2👀2❤1💯1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Eagle_Intel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,130,524 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eagle Intel 🦅” (@Eagle_Intel), 7,150 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eagle_Intel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.