Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

عبري غراف עברי גראף

@EabriGraph

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,687subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002297670763
TypeChannel
Username@EabriGraph
Descriptionالترجمات العبرية في شكلٍ بصري
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EabriGraph

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,200 average views per post against 8,687 subscribers — an engagement rate of 129.4%. Across the 6,598 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 4.00% and 17.5%, with a median of 9.03%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured30 of 30 published in the window (8 exact, 22 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled337,294
Mature posts only138.3% over 28 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,687 measured 11 August 2026
Cohortb3162:ara · 6,598 channels · p10 1.67% · p25 4.00% · p50 9.03% · p75 17.5% · p90 31.4%
Position in cohort99.606th percentile · 14.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.05% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,6738,6878,6807 August 2026 — 8,674 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,674 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,673 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,687 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,671–8,689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:348,687+14
7 Aug 2026, 23:568,673-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:318,674no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:228,674first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
129.4%
avg views ÷ 8,687 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,200
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.022%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held30 (28 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total337,294
Reactions total61
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,830
Videos
110
Links
1,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
29m 31s
Average length
2m 57s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3354.1%
👍2541.0%
😁34.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC327 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 موقع زمان إسرائيل | الذي يدرس قطاع غزة عن كثب ويتواصل مع السكان هناك، يعلم بأن الميليشيات المسلحة لا يوجد لها أي تأثير على الوضع في القطاع، باستثناء الإضرار بمصالح إسرائيل. ✍️ الخبير في الشؤون الفلسطينية ميخائيل ميلشتاين. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف

2

11 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC499 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 موقع زمان يسرائيل | إسرائيل تراهن في غزة على الخيار الخاسر. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف #إنفوغراف

1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC593 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 كيف يرى الغزيون الميليشيات المسلحة؟ ✍️ الخبير الاستخباري مايكل ميلشتاين للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف #إنفوغراف

👍1

10 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC666 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 يديعوت أحرونوت | إن قبول الترتيب القائم على حكومة تكنوقراطية في غزة يُعد خيارًا محفوفًا بالجوانب السلبية لإسرائيل. ✍️ الخبير الاستخباري ميخائيل ميلشتاين. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف

1👍1

10 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈25,800 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 يديعوت أحرونوت | يعكس التركيز المتزايد على قضية غزة نفاد صبر دولي متنامٍ. ✍️ الخبير الاستخباري ميخائيل ميلشتاين. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف

3👍1

9 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC746 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 يديعوت أحرونوت | مليشيا غزة ستضطر للهروب إلى إسرائيل. ✍️ الخبير الاستخباري ميخائيل ميلشتاين. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف

3👍3

9 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈13,700 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 قناة كان العبرية | إسرائيل تدرس نقل المليشيات المسلحة إلى "رفح الجديدة" ✍️ المراسل العسكري إيتاي بلومنتال. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف #إنفوغراف

👍1

8 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC906 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 تايمز أوف إسرائيل | رفضت العديد من العشائر عروضاً إسرائيلية لتولي مسؤولية تأمين مناطق جغرافية محددة في القطاع، خشيةً من اتهامها بالتعاون مع إسرائيل. ✍️ تحقيق استقصائي للصحفية نوريت يوحنان. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف

3👍1

8 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC940 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 موقع زمان إسرائيل | في إشارة إلى المليشيات المسلحة. ✍️ الخبير في الشؤون الفلسطينية ميخائيل ميلشتاين. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف

1👍1

7 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 تايمز أوف إسرائيل | لم يكن أي من قادة الميليشيات المسلحة في غزة شخصيات معروفة أو شخصيات تحظى باحترام خاص في المجتمع الفلسطيني. ✍️ تحقيق استقصائي للصحفية نوريت يوحنان. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف

7 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC997 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 يديعوت أحرونوت | مصير مليشيات غزة المدعومة من إسرائيل ✍️ المسؤول الاستخباري ميخائيل ميلشتاين للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف #إنفوغراف

6 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💠 يديعوت أحرنوت | حقائق صادمة بشأن الواقع في غزة.. حماس حيّة. ✍️ المسؤول الاستخباري السابق ميخائيل ملشتاين. للمزيد انضم إلى المنصة عبر: التليجرام | الفيس بوك | الإنستغرام #عبري_غراف #إنفوغراف

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @EabriGraph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 204,937 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عبري غراف עברי גראף” (@EabriGraph), 8,687 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EabriGraph.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.