Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐Ž๐‘๐ˆ๐— | ุฃูˆุฑูŠูƒุณ

@E_3EM

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

2,840subscribers

-628 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002096129923
TypeChannel
Username@E_3EM
Created22 January 2024 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/E_3EM

Growth

2,8403,4683,1549 August 2026 โ€” 3,468 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 3,466 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 2,840 subscribers9 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -628. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 2,746โ€“3,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:282,840-626
10 Aug 2026, 02:273,466-2
9 Aug 2026, 23:303,468first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 22 January 2024 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
4.72%
avg views รท 2,840 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held10 (22 January 2024 โ€“ 9 August 2026)
Views total1,072
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC72 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ADB_L1

- โ”‡ู‚ู†ุงุฉ Telegram ู„ู„ุจูŠุน โœ”๏ธ . - โ”‡ุงู„ุฅุญุตุงุฆูŠุงุช : 3.4k - โ”‡ุฑุงุจุท ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ : @E_3EM - โ”‡ุงู„ุณุนุฑ : ุฎุงุต - โ”‡ู„ู„ุดุฑุงุก : @LG_E3 - โ”‡ุฏู„ูŠู„ ุงู„ุซู‚ุฉ : @ldtllโœ”๏ธ .

8 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC152 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ู‡ูู€ูˆ ูŠูู€ุจู€ุงูˆุน ุฅู„ู€ู‡ู€ุงุŒ ูˆุงู„ู€ฺฏูู€ู„ู€ุจ ูŠูู€ุถู€ุญู€ูƒ ูˆู‡ูู€ูŠ ู…ูู€ู† ุชูู€ุดู€ูˆูู€ู‡ุŒ ุชูู€ุฎู€ุฌู€ู„ ูˆุชูู€ุณู€ูƒู€ุช ุจูู€ูŠู€ู† ู†ูŽู€ุธู€ุฑุชู€ู‡ู€ู… ุญูู€ฺ†ู€ูŠ ู…ูŽู€ุง ูŠูู€ู†ู€ฺฏู€ุงู„ ุญูู€ุจู‘ู€ู‡ู€ู… ุณูู€ุงูƒู€ุชโ€ฆ ุจู€ุณ ุจู€ุงู„ู€ุนู€ูŠู€ูˆู† ูŠูู€ู†ู€ฺฏู€ุงู„ ๐Ÿค

8 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC177 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

โ™ก ู‡ูู€ูŠ ุชูู€ู…ู€ุดู€ูŠโ€ฆ ูˆู‡ูู€ูˆ ฺฏูู€ู„ู€ุจู€ู‡ ูŠูู€ู…ู€ุดู€ูŠ ูˆุฑุงู‡ุง โ™ก โ™ก ูŠูู€ุจู€ุงูˆุน ุฅู„ู€ู‡ู€ุง ูˆูƒูู€ู„ ุงู„ู€ุฏูู†ู€ูŠู€ุง ู…ูŽู€ุง ูŠูู€ุณู€ูˆุงู‡ุง โ™ก โ™ก ู‡ูู€ูŠ ุนูŽู€ูŠู€ู†ู€ู‡ู€ุง ุนูŽู€ู„ู€ูŠู€ู‡ุŒ ูˆู‡ูู€ูˆ ู†ูŽู€ุธู€ุฑุชู€ู‡ ุฅู„ู€ู‡ู€ุง โ™ก โ™ก ูˆูƒูู€ู„ ูˆุงุญู€ุฏ ู…ูู€ู†ู€ู‡ู€ู… ุตูŽู€ุงุฑ ู„ู„ุซุงู†ูŠ ู…ูู€ู†ู€ุงู‡ู€ุง ๐Ÿค

7 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC123 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

โ™ก ุฅู†ุชูŽ ุถุญูƒุชูŽูƒโ€ฆ ูˆู‡ููŠ ุถุญูƒุชู‡ุง ุญููƒุงูŠุฉ โ™ก โ™ก ู…ูู€ู† ูŠูู„ุชูู…ู‘ู€ู† ุณูู€ูˆู‡ุŒ ุชูุตูŠุฑ ุงู„ุฏูู†ูŠุง ู‡ูŽูˆุงูŠู€ุฉ โ™ก โ™ก ู‡ูู€ูˆ ูŠูุจุงูˆุน ุฅู„ู‡ุงุŒ ูˆู‡ููŠ ุชูุถุญูƒ ุจูุนูŠู†ู€ู‡ โ™ก โ™ก ูˆูƒุฃู† ุงู„ฺฏูู„ุจ ู…ูู† ุดุงูู‡ู… ฺฏุงู„: ู‡ุงูŠ ุฃูู…ู†ู€ุงูŠู€ู‡ ๐Ÿค

19 May 2025, 20:03 UTCโ‰ˆ4,250 viewsread 9 August 2026

ู…ู† ุดูุช ุนูŠูˆู†ฺ† ุถุงุน ุงู„ุญฺ†ูŠ ุจูŠู‘ู‡ ูˆุตุฑุช ุฃุฑูŠุฏฺ† ุจุณ ุฅู†ุชู ุฅู„ูŠู‘ู‡ ู…ูˆ ุญุจ ุนุงุจุฑ ู…ุฑู‘ ุจุนู…ุฑูŠ ุฅู†ุชู ุงู„ุนู…ุฑ ู„ูˆ ูŠู†ุทูˆู†ูŠ ุงู„ุฏู†ูŠุง ู‡ุฏูŠู‘ู‡ ๐Ÿค

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @E_3EM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 10,605 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ž๐‘๐ˆ๐— | ุฃูˆุฑูŠูƒุณโ€ (@E_3EM), 2,840 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/E_3EM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.