Channel
@EZY_system
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,702subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001663778882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EZY_system |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EZY_system |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 1,702 | -2 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 1,704 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 1,707 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 1,707 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
288 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5276448712766266718 | 72 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 13.9% | |
| 😭 | 33 | 11.5% | |
| 🎉 | 25 | 8.68% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 8.68% | |
| custom 5373250962016191937 | 18 | 6.25% | |
| custom 6325444863647024860 | 17 | 5.90% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 5.21% | |
| custom 5436281002949379518 | 14 | 4.86% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 4.51% | |
| custom 5370972645074411400 | 12 | 4.17% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.694% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья! Из-за большого обилия "мёртвых душ" пришедших из разных папок с чатами, прошлого киберпанкового и вообще, я решил сделать бывший резервный канал основным. Пусть нас будет мало, зато все те, кто действительно следит за нашей работой и хочет участвовать в обсуждениях. В этом канале больше ничего нового не будет. Вступайте вот сюда: https://t.me/ofizdat @ofizdat @ofizdat @ofizdat
custom 52764487127662667183
Какой-то психопат крутанул на тот канал 10к ботов, но все они были уничтожены. К сожалению, простых работяг тоже зацепило. Так что переподпишись! @ofizdat @ofizdat @ofizdat
custom 52764487127662667186
Друзья! Из-за большого обилия "мёртвых душ" пришедших из разных папок с чатами, прошлого киберпанкового и вообще, я решил сделать бывший резервный канал основным. Пусть нас будет мало, зато все те, кто действительно следит за нашей работой и хочет участвовать в обсуждениях. В этом канале больше ничего нового не будет. Вступайте вот сюда: https://t.me/ofizdat @ofizdat @ofizdat @ofizdat
custom 54362810029493795184
Студия «Офиздат!» pinned «Друзья! Из-за большого обилия "мёртвых душ" пришедших из разных папок с чатами, прошлого киберпанкового и вообще, я решил сделать бывший резервный канал основным. Пусть нас будет мало, зато все те, кто действительно следит за нашей работой и хочет участвовать…»
Друзья! Из-за большого обилия "мёртвых душ" пришедших из разных папок с чатами, прошлого киберпанкового и вообще, я решил сделать бывший резервный канал основным. Пусть нас будет мало, зато все те, кто действительно следит за нашей работой и хочет участвовать в обсуждениях. В этом канале больше ничего нового не будет. Вступайте вот сюда: https://t.me/ofizdat @ofizdat @ofizdat @ofizdat
😭10👍3🥴2😱1
Давайте, давайте, по кубику скидываемся)))
custom 52764487127662667181
Добьём до 700к и в книгах появится ляссе! https://crowdrepublic.ru/projects/1072977
custom 527644871276626671812👍5custom 53709726450744114003
Жаль, что хотябы до 300 мы так и не дошли. https://crowdrepublic.ru/projects/1072960
😭5
Для Укрытого моря осталось всего 2 ширмы и обе попали в акцию! Не теряй момент, больше их не будет! https://www.ozon.ru/product/shirma-vedushchey-ukrytoe-more-blagoslovennyy-priliv-3233334357/
custom 53732509620161919372custom 52764487127662667181custom 53709726450744114001
А работа над шизо-гейм всё идёт и идёт по плану. Ну почти по плану, плана то нет, а значит всё точно по плану. Ну ты понял
❤🔥8custom 52764487127662667184🔥1
Продолжаю разбирать склад и нашел последнюю колоду карт для Ничьей Земли. Там оружие и действия классов. Есть желающий? 1200р + доставка
👍11
Хотел поиграть в Оперов в Москве, но не знал где? Вот а вот где! https://vk.ru/wall-226199607_1359
custom 54362810029493795182custom 63254448636470248602
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EZY_system. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Студия «Офиздат!»” (@EZY_system), 1,702 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EZY_system.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.