Check out this one guys Etherblocks https://t.me/Etherblocksportal https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x497c0ABaBc3Ba113D68Bf5A15662d05a5B1027F0

Channel
ETH TRENDING
@ERC20TOKENTRENDING
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002044294713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ERC20TOKENTRENDING |
| Description | Dev and Owner -> @Dibesh0321 Don't miss any new 10000x coins Track Buys of all Coins of Ethereum Chain here in Real Time !!! In development |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 17 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ERC20TOKENTRENDING |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 29 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 29 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈63
- Links
- ≈54,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2024 to 26 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
2x
Check out this one guys RUNodE https://t.me/RUNodE_ai\n// https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x6aB98D9E04cFB57C6b6E9800a5a43A9946a6523d
Check out this one guys SuperSonicTrump https://t.me/supersonictrump https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x3c8A91f2279BA1c87315c4020B9f7bC0b50e3e4B
Check out this one guys Wide Trump https://t.me/widetrumpeth https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xAa55A111291697aA46076ea045EA55fCdad4298A
Check out this one guys GrokiAI https://t.me/GROKI_TOKEN https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xC2939996980153F2F3Fc327772Da4B31232B6f77
Check out this one guys ATMA https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x4d948C9da5f27f4a8570B1Ae6B940175076eC453
🔥1
Check out this one guys Helena AI https://t.me/helena_ai_entry https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xb99fD077ea7f113b018F6248800723154280DEed
Check out this one guys Eosphorus AI https://t.me/eosphorus_ai https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x21fAd53C989C5cB4761B5cB64c68b0375d175267
2x
Check out this one guys MoneyDog https://t.me/moneydogonboarder https://www.dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xAE921fbb478dcCb1e699F16a6b98E55Af494880a
Current at 2x
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ERC20TOKENTRENDING. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ERC20TOKENTRENDING named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ETH TRENDING” (@ERC20TOKENTRENDING), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ERC20TOKENTRENDING.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.