Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EKGmaster

Channel

EKGmaster

@EKGmaster_ramaz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

424subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001800882532
TypeChannel
Username@EKGmaster_ramaz
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/EKGmaster_ramaz

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4224244237 August 2026 — 422 subscribers8 August 2026 — 422 subscribers10 September 2026 — 423 subscribers18 September 2026 — 424 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 42 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:58424+1
10 Sept 2026, 06:01423+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:31422no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:47422first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5363.9%
👍1315.7%
🔥89.64%
❤‍🔥56.02%
👏33.61%
🤯11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 15 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EKGmaster_ramaz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2025 to 15 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2025, 13:48 UTC387 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Показательный случай. Парень, 21 год. Осколочное ранение сердца — в область базального сегмента нижне-боковой стенки левого желудочка. В рубашке родился. Осколок хирурги решили не доставать. Так и живет. При этом на ЭКГ без особенностей.

❤13

Signed Рамаз Джоджуа

15 Sept 2025, 06:07 UTC342 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

31 голосов из 500 из них 1 голос моей мамы😁 Отличный результат. Потому что это не случайные клики, а люди, которые реально читают и реагируют. Именно ради вас стоит продолжить, спасибо за поддержку. Поэтому для своих преданных у меня есть подарок — красивая и краткая методичка по основам ЭКГ. Там собраны самые основные моменты для начинающих и возможно, даже опытным пригодится.

🔥8

Signed Рамаз Джоджуа

12 Sept 2025, 07:14 UTC313 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Насколько полезно и интересно?

  1. Ну такое0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥5❤1

Signed Рамаз Джоджуа

12 Sept 2025, 07:13 UTC296 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Приветствую коллеги! Отпуск давно закончился. Неделю я вкатывался в работу, неделю — делал вид, что очень занят. Сейчас сижу и думаю…продолжать блог или забить? Если вам интересно — плюсаните. Если нет — значит, буду молча жить со своими ЭКГ и ЭХОКГ😅

❤13👏1

Signed Рамаз Джоджуа

26 Jul 2025, 09:01 UTC424 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Важно!!! публикации временно приостановлены. Причина: необходимость улучшения когнитивных функций через дозированное безделье и принятие горизонтального положения возле водоема. В общем, я плавно ухожу в отпуск. Но сердцем со всеми вами. Надеюсь ближе к сентябрю появятся интересные ЭКГ, которые мы разберем! 🙏

❤26👏2

Signed Рамаз Джоджуа

11 Jul 2025, 16:32 UTC476 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

МЫСЛИ В СЛУХ… Почему нет признаков тампонады клинически и на ЭхоКГ? На Эхо — выпот выраженный, но: – давление в полостях в норме – правое предсердие и желудочек не спадаются – наполнения не нарушено Почему? Думаю выпот, скорее всего, накапливался очень медленно и сердце адаптировалось. Анализы не видел и анамнез особо не рыл, но вероятно онкопроцесс. Какие еще причины выраженного выпота без особой клиники, как ду…

👍5

Signed Рамаз Джоджуа

11 Jul 2025, 05:09 UTC388 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дообследования пациента. Увеличена тень сердца на рентгене. По ЭХОКГ выраженный выпот в полость перикарда, ориентировочно литра 1,5-2.

👍8🤯1

Signed Рамаз Джоджуа

10 Jul 2025, 20:57 UTC331 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Что можно заподозрить ?

  1. ГЛЖ8%
  2. ГПЖ7%
  3. ТЭЛА8%
  4. Выпот в перикарде77%
  5. Острая ишемия0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Рамаз Джоджуа

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @EKGmaster_ramaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Sept 2025, 07:14 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

Насколько полезно и интересно?

  1. Ну такое0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Jul 2025, 20:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz60 voters

Что можно заподозрить ?

  1. ГЛЖ8%
  2. ГПЖ7%
  3. ТЭЛА8%
  4. Выпот в перикарде77%
  5. Острая ишемия0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 15 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EKGmaster” (@EKGmaster_ramaz), 424 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EKGmaster_ramaz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.