Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

وَاقِع يكتُب .

@ECOO7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,542subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002146893470
TypeChannel
Username@ECOO7
Description- يُهلك المرء بأفكارُه .
CreatedBetween 1 March 2024 and 31 July 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ECOO7

Growth

21,54221,58321,562.58 August 2026 — 21,569 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,583 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,580 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,566 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,542 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 4 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,536–21,589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:1721,542-24
11 Aug 2026, 20:1221,566-14
10 Aug 2026, 22:5321,580-3
9 Aug 2026, 20:3121,583+14
8 Aug 2026, 22:4721,569first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 3 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.356%
avg views ÷ 21,542 subscribers
Avg views / post
76.7
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
44
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held63 (3 August 20259 August 2026)
Views total3,376
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Videos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 62 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ECOO7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2025 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC49 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @XlIX0000

ᴘᴀʀᴛɪᴄɪᴘᴀᴛɪᴏɴ : @ch_ild0

9 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC48 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @smsoma_ae

Exchange: @dent_sm https://t.me/smsoma_ae

9 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @eu_4u2

- توجيه ونوجه . - أساسي بس . @AYOUB_MN

9 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @M_01al

إنك تدخل في علاقةٍ حرّمها ﷲ ، ثم تُسمّيها حبًا لا تغيّر الأسماء حقيقة الأشياءَ ، فما كان حرامًا لا يصبح حلالًا لأن القلب تعلّق بهِ ، وَما يُغضب ﷲ لا يكون حبًا يُرجىٰ منه الخير أو يُبارك فيهِ . الحُب الصَادق لا يجعلك تعصي ربك ، ولا يسرق من قلبك حياءّك ودِينك ، بل يحفظك عَن المعصية حتى يَأتيك ما كتب اللهُ لك بالحلال ، وفِي الوقت الذي قدّره لك ، فلا تجعل مشاعرك سببًا لبُعدك عن ﷲ، ولا تجعل شخصًا سببًا في خسارتك لرضا ﷲ .

9 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC50 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @X0IXI0

- توجـيه و نوجـه - ت @XC_9Q

9 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC39 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ABI0I

𓏺𓏺 𝕋𝕋 𓏺 @A_ll_Y ⭑.ᐟ

9 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC32 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @UI5IIU

ءِشتراك ونردهه : @l7U2u .

9 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC31 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @l_lI_Y

- # اشّتِـراڪَك @P7_X5 : 🗿 .

9 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @SX_Y7

- # اشّتِراڪَك : @X5_Y7➖⤹ .

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @ECOO7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 38,667 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

𓏺 𝒇᥆𝗋 𝗠𝗲 .
@PQVPO · 997
3 posts
ݺ،جيسيكا
@jecka00 · 226
2 posts
دَارين،مُحمد .
@l43_am · 362
2 posts
- شرقـٰاويٰ١٧.
@l_lI_Y · 4,032
2 posts
﮼ نَصِيحه .
@SI2OI · 418
2 posts
ماتيلدَا
@x_vi_6 · 766
2 posts
ׄ 𝗔ᩚ𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗋 ׄ 𝗞ᩚ𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗁𝖺𝗅𝗂 .
@ABI0I · 956
1 post
- الجَماهِيرية .
@AG_19_69 · 9,478
1 post
﮼مُ .
@Billll7 · 163
1 post
ـ ♯﮼مُعاذ العوامِي ! .
@CiIiIl7 · 468
1 post
𓏺 𝓡 𝗮𝘄𝗮𝗵 ᭡ ° .
@E_II_D · 32
1 post
أيُـوب المنصورِي .
@eu_4u2 · 319
1 post
ᖴOᖇ ᗰY
@F0rmY · 719
1 post
أُفُقُ الطُّمَأْنِينَة
@gaa75 · 813
1 post
-السّلسَبِيل
@iillv4 · 124
1 post
- جِيم،العَمامِي .
@Il_l1ll · 251
1 post
نقوطي •
@Ili_Ul · 1
1 post
.𝟭𝟵 -
@lllU80I · 19
1 post
ﻓَﺈِﻧَّﻚَ ﺑِﺄَﻋْﻴُﻨِﻨَﺎ
@M_01al · 344
1 post
مُوما،الهنشِيري⤹ .
@MIIIH3 · 429
1 post
- لـ قَصواء .
@qa_k009 · 468
1 post
لـِ تَـسـنـِيـم 🩰
@smsoma_ae · 441
1 post
𝐂𝐔𝐓𝐄
@So0l0 · 590
1 post
› 𝐇𝘢𝐑𝗹᥆𝐖 .
@SX_Y7 · 250
1 post
- ياسُو البَرعصِي .
@uasiix · 367
1 post
.𓏺 ملاذ -
@UI5IIU · 434
1 post
- نمارق الزاوي.
@V_lI_l · 1,613
1 post
­
@X0IXI0 · 614
1 post
- يقِين،التّايب .
@x_Ya_9 · 195
1 post
𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐌𝐎𝐇𝐀𝐌𝐌𝐀𝐃.
@xi7ni · 549
1 post
𝙱𝙰𝙱𝚈 𝙶𝙸𝚁𝙻
@XlIX0000 · 568
1 post
﮼مُميزه .
@XliY2 · 307
1 post
• 𝐫𝐎𝐳𝐇 .
@YIOIR · 53
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“وَاقِع يكتُب .” (@ECOO7), 21,542 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ECOO7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.