Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 61 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Oct 2026, 15:57
99
-1
30 Aug 2026, 03:25
100
-1
22 Aug 2026, 22:05
101
-1
9 Aug 2026, 10:01
102
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:30
102
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
158 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5256047523620995497
22
13.9%
custom 5375325530004428705
18
11.4%
custom 5229045747130843073
15
9.49%
custom 5226639745106330551
14
8.86%
custom 5373310043586310463
12
7.59%
custom 5465283645788937267
12
7.59%
custom 5375445784793750862
11
6.96%
custom 5449505950283078474
10
6.33%
custom 5465443379917629504
7
4.43%
custom 5375469273969893619
6
3.80%
custom 5431428415754351046
6
3.80%
custom 5453957997418004470
6
3.80%
custom 5280922999241859582
5
3.16%
custom 5364201435858744869
5
3.16%
custom 5375300619194113349
5
3.16%
custom 5364084415179796328
4
2.53%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @E1337events. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 February 2026 to 22 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, важное объявление по CYBER SUMMER❗️
К сожалению, мы вынуждены перенести мероприятие.
Для нас было важно сделать CYBER SUMMER не просто красивым событием, а действительно сильным вечером с качественной программой, гостями, экспертами и атмосферой.
Мы решили, что правильнее будет взять больше времени и провести мероприятие на том уровне, который изначально задумали. А не проводить ивент просто для того, чтоб…
⚡️ CyberTalk: разговор о будущем денег и технологий
🛑Что уже происходит на рынке?
🛑Где появляются новые возможности?
🛑Когда эти изменения почувствует бизнес?
24 июня на CYBER SUMMER состоится CyberTalk – живой экспертный разговор с Александром Бражниковым, директором РАКИБ, и другими экспертами индустрии о крипте, AI, блокчейне и технологиях, которые уже влияют на финансы, бизнес и digital-среду.
Формат CyberTalk …
⚡️БИЛЕТЫ НА CYBER SUMMER!
24 июня мы открываем портал в CYBER SUMMER – пространство для тех, кому интересны технологии, финансы, AI, сильное окружение и события, где всё продумано не только по программе, но и по атмосфере!
Что вас ждёт?
🎙️ Выступления спикеров
🤝 Продуктивный нетворкинг
🪩 Вечеринка в стиле киберпанк
🍸 Фуршет & Free Bar
✨ DJ-ведущий и фотограф
🌆 Открытая терраса
И совершенно непохожий формат на дру…
🌆 CYBER SUMMER – вечер о новых технологиях, людях и будущем!
Это не конференция, куда приходят просто послушать спикеров.
И не вечеринка, где всё заканчивается случайными разговорами.
Это вечер для тех, кто выбирает окружение.
Для предпринимателей, инвесторов, трейдеров, специалистов из digital-среды и людей, которым интересно не просто наблюдать за будущим, а быть среди тех, кто его формирует.
Вас ждёт продуманн…
CYBER SUMMER | 24.06 | Москва
24 июня E1337 Events открывает портал в CYBER SUMMER – событие о цифровой революции, технологиях и людях, формирующих будущее!
В этот вечер мы воссоздадим атмосферу киберпанка, где индустриальный андеграунд встретится с миром высоких технологий!
ЧТО ВАС ЖДЁТ?
🎙️ Выступления спикеров
🤖 AI, робототехника и автоматизация
📈 Финансы и трейдинг
🤝 Продуктивный нетворкинг
🌆 Открытая терраса
🍕…
На прошлой неделе посетили Crypto Summit 2026 – ежегодный форум по криптовалютам и блокчейн-технологиям 🚀
Подобные мероприятия – отличная возможность лично пообщаться с проектами, обменяться контактами и наметить потенциальные партнёрства и сотрудничества.
Мы уже активно готовимся к следующему ивенту и совсем скоро анонсируем его! Следите за каналом, скоро увидимся!
С любовью, команда E1337 💎
А вот и самый яркий фотоотчет в истории криптоивентов! 🦜✨
Посмотреть фотоальбом 📚
Отмечайте нас @ElitePartyAgency
До встречи на следующем ивенте! 😊
🌐 Канал | 💬 Чат | 📲 Связь
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @E1337events. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@E1337events named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@chateliteparty named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“E1337 Event Agency” (@E1337events), 99 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/E1337events.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
