Channel
@E09Uj8V78SJhNmY1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,118subscribers
+3,042 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002269635159 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @E09Uj8V78SJhNmY1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/E09Uj8V78SJhNmY1 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 4,118 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 4,120 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 4,121 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 4,115 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 4,110 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 4,105 | +3,031 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 1,074 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 1,076 | +6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 1,070 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 1,075 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 1,074 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 1,078 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 1,076 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
碎碎念 26/8/8 玩不动了，7 天点 5 个女仆，来来回回都是那点儿事儿，没啥意思🫠 怎么说呢，如果想点新人，大家凭兴趣选女仆就行，各花入各眼，谨防恶意炒作。有的时候，大家都鼓吹的一些女仆，其实你真的点过了之后，也就那么回事儿。 当然，你并不能说人家骗你了，也可能人家就是喜欢那个姑娘身上的那股劲儿，只是恰巧不适合你罢了。 如果你想点熟人的话，需要面对的一个问题就是：俩人实在太熟了，姑娘屁话多得要死，在你旁边叽里呱啦地讲起来八卦就没完了。你钟上的时间就会飞速流逝，转头发现都下钟半小时了，还啥也没干。 另外，如果你们足够熟的话（四五刷以上），其实姑娘是不太好亲的。新鲜感退了之后，姑娘很容易卡你，即便你通关了，她也能卡你🐍。 而且你根本没有办法通过既点新人又点旧人的这种交替性点单，来同时满足你的新鲜感与熟悉感。当样本量足够大了以后，这些感觉都会消退，最后剩下的只有索然无味。 苦海无边，回头是岸。个人的寂寞，根本无法通…
❤2
【女仆花名】：小糖 【年龄】：19 【身高】：166 【体重】：80 【凶器】：A 【体验日期】：8 月 7 日 【报告人】：礼礼 【店铺名 】: 遇见love私影 【价格】：1h 【店内环境】：温馨 【包房环境】：温馨 【人照相似度】:10 【颜值扮相】：10 【配合素质】：10 【情绪价值】：10 【胸臀身段】：10 【整体感受】：配合度很高 【服务内容】：闲聊逗小孩 【服务详情】： 今年截至目前，除晴晴外，点过的颜值最高的女仆。娃娃脸，皮包骨，有马甲线，看着年纪巨小，好像 16 岁的中学生，实际也刚高考完。 照片因为美颜的缘故，其实没本人好看，真人要更可爱许多。但你又完全不能因为她看着小，就以为啥也不会。聊了没一会儿，发现这孩子谈了十几个男朋友，真是中学六年一点没浪费，也不知道怎么考上的省重点高中。 另外，姑娘有过几家店的女仆从业经验与酒吧混迹历史，所以不用担心尺度一类的问题，具体进一步的内容，感兴趣的朋友可以自行探…
单刷不好玩，多刷爱摆烂，熟了还容易有逼事。 日尼玛，俺累了🫠
【女仆花名】：小米 【年龄】：23 【身高】：165 【体重】：95 【凶器】：B 【体验日期】：8 月 5 日 【报告人】：礼礼 【店铺名 】: 幸屿女仆 【价格】：1h 【店内环境】：温馨 【包房环境】：温馨 【人照相似度】:10 【颜值扮相】：10 【配合素质】：10 【情绪价值】：10 【胸臀身段】：10 【整体感受】：配合度很高 【服务内容】：初级女仆教学 【服务详情】： 纯新人，上班第二天。人照相似度较高，肩膀有小面积符文。 鉴于姑娘是个新人，本着服务兄弟们的原则 ，教授了一些初阶的调情技巧，姑娘悟性不错，根骨极佳，适合后续深入培养。 整体而言，敏感度高，配合度好，亲的投入，贴贴得舒服，可以慢慢向服务系转型。 #小米2
❤1
https://t.me/jungubushicai5220 该死的家伙，又复活了。 不知又要糟蹋多少妹妹🫠
【女仆花名】：饼干（二刷） 【年龄】：大二 【身高】：160 【体重】：95 【凶器】：A 【体验日期】：8 月 3 日 【报告人】：礼礼 【店铺名 】: 诱饵私影 【价格】：2h 【店内环境】：投影仪不错 【包房环境】：宽敞 【人照相似度】:10 【颜值扮相】：10 【配合素质】：10 【情绪价值】：10 【胸臀身段】：10 【整体感受】：乖乖川妹 【服务内容】：亲亲亲亲亲 【服务详情】： 很乖，很好亲，配合度很高，该有的都有，没有的你们自己教吧。也没上几天班，还属于新人。 #饼干
情色业 熟悉感🆚新鲜感消费占比
西安女仆风月宝鉴 pinned a photo
西安女仆群汇总 诱饵 https://t.me/youernp666888 幸屿 https://t.me/xinyusiying 小红楼 https://t.me/xiantingting5858 小岛 https://t.me/xiaodaosiying 花间月 https://t.me/huajianyue0000 小雪 https://t.me/xian0004 半梦 https://t.me/banmengsiying666 念希 https://t.me/nianxisiying 西米 https://t.me/xi_ansiying 豆包 https://t.me/bmdq1314 觅语 https://t.me/miyusy888 柚柚 https://t.me/dian_yuyue 自由时间 https://t.me/+SaHX18qhlL4wZDk1 新感觉 https://t.me/Xiansy2026 …
西安女仆风月宝鉴 pinned Deleted message
再论情绪价值 时隔一年再谈情绪价值，我想先把范围说清楚：只有当这份刺激跟某个具体的人绑在一起，它才算情绪价值。吃饱、赚钱、刷短视频，同样让大脑愉悦，但那是奖励。混在一起说，这个词就退化成“爽”的同义词，什么也解释不了。 按这个范围，可以简单分成两类。 一、外源型：刺激由对方给出 讨好、夸赞、深度对话，都属于这一类。这类情绪价值的产生，说白了就是一方比另一方多主动一点，多调动一点情绪或表演性的行为，让接收的那一方舒服一点。哪怕对方脸上没什么反馈，心里其实还是受用的。没有人真的讨厌赞美，哪怕明知是刻意逢迎。这也是日常生活里最常接触的一种，成本低，见效稳。 二、内源型：刺激由自己生成 对方未必健谈，未必调皮可爱，但身上某个点、某股子劲儿把你勾住了，于是大脑开始自转。不必线下互动，仅凭颅内意淫，也足以完成刺激与奖励的全过程。 更要紧的是大脑的自我补全能力：现实里平淡甚至扫兴的一次见面，事后会被重新讲成一个值得自我感动的故事…
❤1
【女仆花名】：哈尼 【年龄】：23 【身高】：162 【体重】：87 【凶器】：B 【体验日期】：7月 24日 【报告人】：礼礼 【店铺名 】: 自由时间 【价格】：2h 【店内环境】：温馨 【包房环境】：温馨 【人照相似度】:10 【颜值扮相】：10 【配合素质】：10 【情绪价值】：10 【胸臀身段】：10 【整体感受】：哄成胚胎 【服务内容】：要抱抱/要亲亲/别咬我 【服务详情】： 真是好久没见过这么能说会道的女仆了，直接被骑身上压着摩擦。共情能力很强，会照顾你的微小情绪和需求，且不会让每一句掉地上，牛逼。 虽然不知道为什么，但总感觉姐妹像商务场出来的，对话、互动、节奏把控、服务意识应该受过专业训练。当然也可能因为主业是团体主播的原因，自然就带着几分职业习惯。身材颜值也还不错，有几分露露姐的风韵。 推荐给喜欢轻熟风、爱聊天、想调情，或者直接摆烂等着被妹妹哄的朋友，绝对让你满载而归。 #哈尼
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @E09Uj8V78SJhNmY1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“西安女仆风月宝鉴” (@E09Uj8V78SJhNmY1), 4,118 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/E09Uj8V78SJhNmY1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.