Photo, posted without a caption
❤13🔥3👻2🐳1

Channel
@DykeMutt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
584subscribers
+66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002749792662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DykeMutt |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DykeMutt |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 10:55 | 584 | +12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 572 | +19 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 553 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 544 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 539 | +12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 527 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 519 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 518 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 518 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
275 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 141 | 51.3% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 13.8% | |
| 💯 | 34 | 12.4% | |
| 🍓 | 13 | 4.73% | |
| 💘 | 13 | 4.73% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 3.27% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.727% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.727% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.364% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.364% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 275 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤13🔥3👻2🐳1
Anyhow stay degenerate y'all
🥰5🐳4
SCAMMED
TFW you try four different kinds of bipolar meds to deal with your Lows and the only thing that ends up actually helping is APPARENTLY just going for fuckin walks every day
💯10💘5👏2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12🥰8🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8🍓1💯1
You could say well oh it's local governances own fault that they got into business with Flock to begin with but an increasing amount of private investigation into the backing proponents of the use of Flock cameras leads back to career feds and their families, people with ties to Palantir, people with ties to Persona, and people with ties to conservative think tanks, and a good portion of these people have wealth beyo…
💯11❤5
Fun fact, Flock doesn't take their cameras down when asked to, and the contract they make organizations sign prohibits anyone else from taking them down themselves, even when their contracts for a specific city or region gets cancelled and all it does is cost them money to keep their feeds running,, SUPPOSEDLY. It's almost as if they care more about the feed coverage than about their contracts for SOME reason :)
💯12❤3🍓2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10🍓1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12💘5🍓1
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰15😁2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DykeMutt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✨ Muttgirl Posting ✨” (@DykeMutt), 584 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DykeMutt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.