Posted without readable text

Channel
Dviguha v Tone 🎮💎🐼
@DvignVT
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,031subscribers
+1,280 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003933703281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DvignVT |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DvignVT |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 9,031 | +387 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 8,644 | +185 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 8,459 | +28 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 8,431 | +24 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 8,407 | +42 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:14 | 8,365 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 8,386 | +184 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 8,202 | +427 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 7,775 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 7,763 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 7,766 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 7,770 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 7,772 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 7,761 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 7,751 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 7,751 | first reading |
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 59 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 41s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 34 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 64 | 49.6% | |
| ❤ | 33 | 25.6% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 9.30% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.33% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.33% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 59 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DvignVT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🚀 Портал заключил коллаборацию с токеном Major: первым делом провели buyback на 1 млн токенов 💸 Успех ещё неизвестен, но это уже гораздо лучше, чем ничего 👌 Шаг в правильном направлении для токеномики Major 📈 #Major #MajorToken #Buyback #Crypto #Web3 #Tokenomics #Криптовалюта
🚀 Rocket-чек на 68.003 GRAM (99.3$) Внутри чека: 5231 активация(й) по 0.013 GRAM (0.02$) 💬 Удивительный блокнот L.
❤2👍1
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Прогноз цены TON / Gram (ex-Toncoin) на 2026–2030 📈 Текущая цена (24 августа 2026): ≈ $1.47–1.50 💰 Краткосрочный прогноз (до конца 2026) Сценарий Диапазон цены Вероятность Медвежий 🐻 $1.20 – $1.60 Средняя Базовый ⚖️ $1.70 – $2.30 Высокая Бычий 🐂 $2.50 – $3.50+ Низкая Большинство аналитических моделей сейчас дают среднюю цель на конец 2026 года около $1.70–2.00. 🎯 Среднесрочный и долгосрочный прогноз 2027: $1.40 – $…
😱 По 3 скина в день! 🚀 Художники разогнались по-серьёзному С момента прошлого обновления карточки прошло всего 15 дней, а команда уже успела доделать ещё 41 скин. 🎨 Прогресс заметно ускорился — ждать следующую партию осталось совсем недолго. А следующими, судя по всему, будут лампы. 💡 Есть у вас хотя бы одна лампа в коллекции? 😎 #скины #готовностьскинов #новыескины #лампы #коллекцияскинов #прогрессскинов
👍2
🚀 Telegram обновился! Приложение снова просит обновление — на экране кнопка «Обновить». Если ещё не обновили Telegram Messenger — сделайте это прямо сейчас. ✅ Быстрее работает ✅ Меньше багов ✅ Новые фишки и улучшения ✅ Выше безопасность Не тяните — старые версии со временем начинают тормозить и терять актуальные функции. 👉 Заходите в магазин приложений и жмите «Обновить». Уже обновились? Жмите 🔥 в комментариях …
🔥3👍1
Bitcoin почти $79 000! 🚀 Сегодня BTC мощно пробивает уровни и подходит вплотную к отметке $79 000. 📈 Сильный рост, объёмы высокие, рынок явно в бычьем настроении. 🐂 Кто ещё сомневался? 🤔 Кто продавал на страхе? 😱 А кто просто HODL’ит и улыбается? 😎 До новых ATH уже не так далеко 👀 #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto Что думаете — пробьём 80к в ближайшие дни? Пишите в комментах 👇
❤2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @DvignVT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@SunmoonCrypto · 4,5162 postsBond gifts 🎁 Crypto
@Bondgiftscrypo · 9361 post𐌺ATᥲᥒᥲ
@channelkatanaa · 1,4321 postRedSky | Universe
@cheki_telegram · 1,2091 post🍭𝒞𝒽𝓇𝒾𝓈𝓉𝓎 𝒞𝓇𝓎𝓅𝓉𝑜✨
@Christycrypto · 2,9871 postЧестные чеки
@fallout2102 · 8,7881 post#HANSEN
@hansenio · 2,5871 postKRYPTO HUNTER 🔥 🦅
@KRiptoHuNteR16 · 2,3491 postTOPTOP🔺️🔻
@MORIHEATOP · 6411 postⲢⲟⲙⲓⲇⲟʀ Ⲥⲟⲙⲙυⲛⲓⲧⲩ #ⲇⲉϝ
@NFTPCTY · 2851 postSquare crypto box🔥
@Square_crypto_box · 7641 post𝐓𝐆 𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐏𝐌 🗣
@TgEarningPm · 23,9401 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dviguha v Tone 🎮💎🐼” (@DvignVT), 9,031 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DvignVT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.