2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 17:15
19
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:28
19
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 14 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
110
Videos
34
Links
68
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
43m 06s
Average length
5m 23s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
166 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 6037379908160720606
36
21.7%
custom 5846118456054779532
19
11.4%
custom 5981093588652526830
19
11.4%
custom 5920075812911976155
14
8.43%
custom 5911130873503158361
13
7.83%
custom 5814656450517015834
12
7.23%
custom 5974150099708679853
10
6.02%
custom 5938453591424503240
7
4.22%
custom 5866400906534194666
6
3.61%
custom 5231039565438919431
5
3.01%
custom 5847995391122869577
5
3.01%
custom 6037367710453599493
5
3.01%
custom 5978600617835236923
4
2.41%
custom 5258287271756440632
3
1.81%
custom 5832384984593206481
3
1.81%
custom 5913563577339351144
3
1.81%
custom 5314647211299067950
1
0.602%
custom 5983282278216764633
1
0.602%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 11 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DunkanDarkness. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2025 to 11 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вайб 2008
В 11 крупных российских городах застройщики оказались на грани банкротства из-за сворачивания льготной ипотеки. За год объемы кредитования новостроек снизились почти втрое: с 475 до 167 млрд рублей в месяц. Также снизился спрос на новое жилье.
Ушла эпоха: зеленый холм с обоев Windows XP умер — теперь на его месте обычный виноградник.
Фото «Безмятежность» сняли в 1998 году, когда вредители временно уничтожили лозу. Кадр не редактировали — просто идеальный момент, пойманный на пленку случайно.
Теперь виноград вернули, а культовый вид исчез.
Похоже, бюрократы из OFAC (американская контора по контролю за "грязными" активами) снова получили щелчок по носу! 💥
Федеральный судья в Техасе только что постановил, что их вторая попытка наехать на Tornado Cash 🌪️ в ноябре 2022 года была незаконной!
Суть: Судья Роберт Питман решил, что эти дармоеды из Казначейства не удосужились соблюсти собственные же правила (Administrative Procedure Act), когда пытались повтор…
🧍♂️ «I’ve moved on to other things».
14 лет назад, 23 апреля 2011 года, Сатоши написал это письмо и исчез.
Это было его финальное сообщение сообществу — короткое и сухое. Он передал проект Гэвину и больше не выходил на связь.
Получатель — Майк Херн, один из ранних контрибьюторов.
Тема — будущее BitcoinJ и вопрос, вернётся ли Сатоши в разработку.
Ответ: нет. Он ушёл. Навсегда.
С тех пор Bitcoin растёт без своего с…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DunkanDarkness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“D4RK” (@DunkanDarkness), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DunkanDarkness.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.