Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,006–2,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 01:37
2,396
+81
14 Sept 2026, 02:15
2,315
+63
10 Sept 2026, 03:39
2,252
+195
4 Sept 2026, 11:39
2,057
-3
31 Aug 2026, 21:34
2,060
+2
28 Aug 2026, 10:53
2,058
-2
25 Aug 2026, 11:06
2,060
-6
19 Aug 2026, 08:36
2,066
+2
16 Aug 2026, 18:27
2,064
+1
10 Aug 2026, 05:24
2,063
-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:24
2,066
-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:19
2,067
no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:39
2,067
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 47s
Average length
2m 48s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
140 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
121
86.4%
👍
7
5.00%
😍
5
3.57%
👏
2
1.43%
💯
2
1.43%
👌
1
0.714%
👎
1
0.714%
😢
1
0.714%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴 رازهای اتاق زوجدرمانی
🔸 راهنمای عملی REBT برای درمانگران
👤 دکتر هومن نامور
🔹روانشناس سلامت
🔹 زوجدرمانگررفتاریعقلانیهیجانی
🔹 دانشآموخته Albert Ellis Institute
💻 همزمان بهصورت حضوری و آنلاین
💥 فرصتی ویژه برای روانشناسانِ شهرهای دور و نزدیک
🟩 تاریخ دوره: چهارشنبه و پنجشنبه | ۲۱ و ۲۲ مرداد
⏰ ساعت: ۱۰ تا ۱۸
ثبتنام:
☎️ ۰۲۱۸۸۸۸۰۳۵۶
📱 ۰۹۳۵۳۴۳۹۸۹۸
@raftar_institute
#زوجدرمانی #REBT #روانشناسی #روانشناس #ا…
🟠 شکستن چرخه افسردگی
🔸 راهنمای عملی برای درمانگران
👤 دکتر هومن نامور
🔹روانشناس سلامت
🔹 رفتاردرمانگرعقلانیهیجانی
🔹 دانشآموخته Albert Ellis Institute
*️⃣ بعضی رنجها با یک اتفاق شروع میشوند،
اما با جملههایی که بعد از آن به خودمان میگوییم، عمیقتر میشوند:
«نباید اینطور میشد.»
«من دیگر خوب نمیشوم.»
«اگر شکست خوردم، پس بیارزشم.»
میان اتفاق و احساس، جهانی از باورها وجود دارد.
درمان افسردگی از نگاه REBT، انک…
💎تربیت درمانگر حرفهای
🔸دوره هجدهم مقدماتی تربیت رفتاردرمانگرعقلانیهیجانی (REBT)
همهچیز از یک نقطه آغاز میشود.
دوره مقدماتی REBT همان «نقطه ی شروع» ورود به دنیای رفتار درمانی عقلانی هیجانی است؛ جایی که با مفاهیم پایه، مدل فکری آلبرت الیس و نگاه متفاوت به هیجانها، افکار و رفتارها آشنا میشوید.
این دوره فقط یک کلاس مقدماتی نیست؛ اولین قدم در مسیری است که میتواند سالها در زندگی شخصی، حرفهای و درمانی همراه…
“حرفهای باش”
درمان مبتنی بر خرد
روانشناسی، هوشمندی، تغییر
- چرا باید روانشناسی خواند؟
- چرا باید در روانشناسی حرفهای بود؟
- و چرا باید هر روانشناس حرفهای REBT بداند.
دکتر هومن نامور
🔹روانشناس سلامت
🔹رفتاردرمانگر عقلانیهیجانی (REBT)
🔹دانشآموخته Albert Ellis Institute
💻 بهصورت آنلاین
💥 فرصتی ویژه برای مبتدی تا متخصص
وبینار رایگان است 🆓
🟩 زمان برگزاری: شنبه | ۳ مردادماه
⏰ ساعت: ۱۹ تا ۲۱
ثبتنام:
https:…
اگر هنوز فکر میکنید «داشتن اتاق درمان» یعنی درمانگر بودن، احتمالاً وقتش رسیده یک بار دیگر به کارتان نگاه کنید.
بسیاری از درمانگران سالها مراجع میبینند، اما هنوز نمیتوانند توضیح دهند:
چرا یک مراجع تغییر میکند و دیگری نه؟
چرا بعضی مراجعان برنمیگردند؟
و اصلاً از کجا باید فهمید درمان مؤثر بوده است؟
رفتاردرمانی عقلانیهیجانی(REBT) فقط یک رویکرد دیگر نیست؛ یک چارچوب منسجم برای فکر کردن، فرمولبندی مسئله و ایجاد تغییر…
درمان فقط شنیدن و همدلی نیست.
اگر باورهای ناکارآمد بهموقع دیده و اصلاح نشوند، آرامآرام روی رابطهها، تصمیمها، عملکرد شغلی و کیفیت زندگی ما اثر میگذارند.
در رویکرد REBT، مسئله فقط کاهش موقتِ ناراحتی نیست؛
مسئله حرکت به سمت خِرد است.
خِردی که کمک میکند واقعبینانهتر فکر کنیم، بین خواستن و ضرورت فرق بگذاریم، ناکامی را فاجعه نکنیم و با خودمان، دیگران و زندگی منعطفتر روبهرو شویم.
برای همین، REBT فقط یک روش برای به…
در روانشناسی هم مثل خیلی حوزههای دیگر، هر چند وقت یکبار نامهای تازهای میآیند؛
اصطلاحات جدیدتر میشوند، دورهها بیشتر میشوند و رویکردها با بستهبندیهای تازه معرفی میشوند.
اما یک سؤال ساده برای هر روانشناس باقی میماند:
این ایدهها از کجا شروع شدهاند؟
سالها قبل از اینکه درمان رفتاریشناختی به جریان اصلی رواندرمانی تبدیل شوند،
آلبرت الیس در REBT توجه درمانگران را به نقش باورهای نامعقول در رنج انسان جلب کر…
در رویکرد REBT یک واقعیت مهم وجود دارد: مشکل اصلی ما گذشته نیست، آدمهای اطرافمان هم نیستند. آنچه امروز زندگی ما را شکل میدهد، باورها، تفسیرها و انتخابهای خود ماست.
تا زمانی که مسئولیت هیجانها، تصمیمها و رفتارهایمان را به گردن شرایط، خانواده یا دیگران بیندازیم، قدرت تغییر را از خودمان میگیریم. تغییر از جایی آغاز میشود که بپذیریم شاید همه چیز تحت کنترل ما نباشد، اما پاسخ ما به اتفاقات همیشه در اختیار خود ماست.
…
رویکرد REBT برای انسان امروز است
انسانی که میخواهد به جای ماندن در گذشته، مسئولیت زندگی خود را بپذیرد و تغییر را از امروز آغاز کند.
در این رویکرد، به جای جستوجوی بیپایان ریشه مشکلات، باورهایی را به چالش میکشیم که امروز مانع رشد ما هستند.
رویکردREBT میراث آلبرت الیس و حاصل سالها پژوهش و تجربه است؛ مسیری برای زندگی آگاهانهتر، منعطفتر و کارآمدتر.
#دکتر_هومن_نامور #انستیتو_رفتار #REBT #روانشناسی
@DrHoomanNa…
📒 پرفروشترینهای روانشناسی و هنر
🌟 موجود شد
📚 مجموعه چهارده جلدی "کتابهای کوچک"
🔸 کتاب کوچک عشق
🔸 کتاب کوچک آرامش
🔸 کتاب کوچک اعتماد
🔸 کتاب کوچک معنا
🔸 کتاب کوچک مثبتگرایی
🔸 کتاب کوچک خوشبختی
🔸 کتاب کوچک امید
🔸 کتاب کوچک وقوف
🔸 کتاب کوچک تابآوری
🔸 کتاب کوچک مراقبه
🔸 کتاب کوچک آرمیدگی
🔸 کتاب کوچک الهام
🔸 کتاب کوچک دوستی
🔸 کتاب کوچک آسایش
📕 نویسنده: لوسی لین
📗 مترجم: دکتر هومن نامور
🟩 خرید کتاب:
Raftarinsti…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Drhoomannamvar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Drhoomannamvar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@raftar_institute named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
انجمن روانشناسی ایران @iranpsyasso · 24,563 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
M. Motaharnia Kolahi اندیشکده سیمرغ باریخ @MehdiMotaharnia1344 · 58,137 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دکتر هومن نامور” (@Drhoomannamvar), 2,396 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Drhoomannamvar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.