Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Le Drapeau Noir | La Boutique

Channel

Le Drapeau Noir | La Boutique

@DrapeauNoirBoutique

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,966subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002032039132
TypeChannel
Username@DrapeauNoirBoutique
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrapeauNoirBoutique

Growth

1,9641,9661,9656 August 2026 — 1,964 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,964 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,965 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,966 subscribers6 August 202619 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 12 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,964–1,966 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 04:141,966+1
16 Aug 2026, 07:591,965+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:501,964no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:491,964first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.7%
avg views ÷ 1,966 subscribers
Avg views / post
937
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held15 (7 June 202624 July 2026)
Views total4,685
Reactions total164
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 07s
Average length
4m 07s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

599 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28747.9%
🔥25342.2%
👍599.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 599reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC871 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Nouveau compte TikTok après la censure de l’ancien ! https://www.tiktok.com/@ledrapeaunoir.fr

👍16

22 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,070 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Nouveau pack « Foot » ! 🏟️ 👉🏻 7 € les 100 sticks 👉🏻 Commande sur le site 🏴 100% des bénéfices reversés aux camarades victimes de la répression judiciaire 💸

28🔥7👍6

22 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC950 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Nouveau pack « Zone Natio » ! 👉🏻 7 € les 100 sticks 👉🏻 Commande sur le site 🏴 100% des bénéfices reversés aux camarades victimes de la répression judiciaire 💸

27🔥5👍3

22 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTC917 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Nouveau pack « Village Natio » ! 👉🏻 7 € les 100 sticks 👉🏻 Commande sur le site 🏴 100% des bénéfices reversés aux camarades victimes de la répression judiciaire 💸

🔥378

22 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTC877 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Nouveau pack « Anti-Antifa » ! 👉🏻 7 € les 100 sticks 👉🏻 Commande sur le site 🏴 100% des bénéfices reversés aux camarades victimes de la répression judiciaire 💸

🔥27

30 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,400 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @assoclanVideo

🧨 Aliette Bertin nous donne des nouvelles de son mari, Eliot, toujours incarcéré, et dénonce le deux poids, deux mesures de la justice, qui s'acharne sur les militants nationalistes. « Les meurtriers de Quentin, Louis, ... les violeurs d'enfants sont présumés innocents, eux. Mon mari, lui, est présumé coupable parce que militant nationaliste. Les juges préfèrent donner la liberté pour les violeurs d'enfants, et la

40🔥11👍2

21 Jun 2026, 19:21 UTC≈2,050 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

45🔥3👍2

20 Jun 2026, 09:24 UTC≈3,590 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌴 Collection WBS26 en collaboration avec @MaurrassienGraphisme ☀️ 👉🏻 Du S au 3XL 👉🏻 Commande sur ledrapeaunoir.fr 🏴 100% des bénéfices reversés aux camarades victimes de la répression judiciaire 💸

38🔥16👍8

20 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC≈1,570 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏴 Casquette « We Hate Antifa » ☀️ 👉🏻 20€ 👉🏻 Commande sur ledrapeaunoir.fr 🏴 100% des bénéfices reversés aux camarades victimes de la répression judiciaire 💸

31👍6🔥4

12 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,560 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @assoclanPhoto

🏴 Depuis février 2025, à la suite d'un affrontement survenu dans les rues de Paris, une véritable campagne médiatique et politique s'est abattue sur de jeunes militants nationalistes. Avant même que la justice ne se prononce, certains médias et militants antifascistes ont présenté les faits comme une tentative d'homicide et évoqué des coups de couteau, alimentant pendant des semaines un récit alarmiste sans rapport a

🔥416👍3

8 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,670 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌴 Pour patienter jusqu'au WBS ☀️ - 20% sur tout le site jusqu'à demain 20h avec le code promo : 200806

🔥226👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @DrapeauNoirBoutique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 393,483 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Le Drapeau Noir | La Boutique” (@DrapeauNoirBoutique), 1,966 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrapeauNoirBoutique.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.