Channel
@Dr_jamal_albasha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,117subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001112620636 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dr_jamal_albasha |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dr_jamal_albasha |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 4,117 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 4,121 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 4,123 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 4,126 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:23 | 4,130 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 4,136 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 4,146 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 4,150 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 4,146 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 4,148 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 4,157 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 4,158 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
417 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 304 | 72.9% | |
| 👍 | 88 | 21.1% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 2.88% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.959% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2025 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔹️ "كأس العالم .. دموعٌ ودموع" !! ✍🏻 د. جمال الباشا بِتنا نرى دموعَ الفرَح ودموعَ الحزن في مشهدٍ واحد، في وقتٍ واحد، على صعيدٍ واحد، من عيون اللاعبين والمشجعين في الملاعب وخارجها !! إنها دموعٌ تدَفَّقُ بعَفويةٍ دون تصنُّع، لأنها تنبثق عن صدق المشاعر بالظفَر أو الخيبة. هذا الشأنُ في أحوالٍ وهميةٍ مؤقَّتةٍ سُرعانَ ما يطويها النسيان. انظروا كيف يفرحُ المرءُ بإنجازه، حينما يجتهدُ في العمل للوصول إلى مطلوبه، فيبلغ…
❤23👍8
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11👍4
قال الخطيبُ: في سياق الحديث عن الهجرة النبوية الشريفة، والمؤاخاة بين المهاجرين والأنصار، قال: [ فمنهم من تقاسم مع أخيه ماله، ومنهم من تقاسم معه منزله، ومنهم من طلق إحدى زوجاته ليتزوجها أخوه المهاجر] !!! وهذا من الغلط الظاهر، وعدم التدقيق في الروايات المنقولة وضبطها، وقد تثير لدى السامع إشكالات واعتراضات شتَّى! منها: هل المرأة من متاع الرجل وملكيته الخاصة التي يحق له أن يهديها لغيره، وكأنها بلا كينونة ولا مشاعر، فيظهر…
❤16👍8🫡1
صفحة جديدة على الواتس أب لنشر مقالات كتاب مسلكيات تحتاج دعمكم والمساهمة في نشر رابطها على أوسع نطاق: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbDVdVs6hENpHbhIzm0r
❤12👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔹مسلك (48): يومُ العمُر لم يكن ذلك الرجلُ يعلم أنَّ اليومَ الذي أماطَ فيه الشوكَ عن طريق الناس كان أفضلَ أيام حياته إذ غفَر اللهُ له به. ولم تكن المرأةُ البغيُّ تتوقَّعُ أن يكونَ أسعدَ أيام حياتها ذلك اليوم الذي سقَت فيه كلباً أرهقه العطشُ فشكر اللهُ صنيعَها وغفر لها. إنَّ أسعدَ أيام يوسفَ عليه السلام كان ذلك اليوم الذي انتصرَ فيه على داعي الغريزة ووقف في وجه امرأة العزيز قائلاً: {معاذ الل…
❤29
"حكم من تلفظ بالكفر ولم يقصد الكفر" إنَّ من أسوء ما يُدفع به عن السابِّ الذي يتلفظ بألفاظ الكفر أنه لم يقصد الكفر، والعلماء قرروا أنَّ المسلم لا يكفر إلا إذا كان قاصدا !! وهذا الفهم يجتمع فيه الجهل والتضليل معا، فالعلماء حينما تكلموا عن اشتراط القصد أرادوا قصد الفعل لا قصد الكفر؟ والفرق بينهما ظاهر، فإنك لا تكاد تجد أحدا على ظهر البسيطة يكفر لأنه يقصد الكفر، بل الكفار بعامة يعتقدون أنهم على حق ويستحسنون دين…
👍18❤10
"شجاعة الجبناء" ✍🏻 د. جمال الباشا لقد أصبحتُ اليوم على يقين أنَّ أحدًا من الصحابة الكرام من الصف الأول لو بعث فينا اليوم وتولى إمرة المسلمين لكان فيهم المنتقِد والمعترض والممتعض، ولسعى طائفة منهم لتصفيته جسديا، وكنت قبل ذلك أستغرب حينما أقرأ في قَصص التاريخ كيف لرجل مثل ذي النورين عثمان بن عفان صهر الرسول عليه الصلاة والسلام يتم اغتياله في داره بين أهله ومقربيه، وهو من هو شرفا ومكانة وسبقا في الإسلام، والقتلة…
❤19👍2💯2🕊2🔥1
اللهمَّ إنا نبرأُ إليك من خذلانِ المسرى والأسرى، ونشهدكَ أنَّ قلوبنا تحترقُ شوقاً ونصرةً
😢12❤9👍1
المقال مترجم إلى الفارسية
❤6
انعقدَ لساني عن كل كلام إلا عن التسبيح.. سبحانك يا ربُّ! سبحانك يا ربُّ! سبحانك يا خالقي ويا مَليكي!! وتذكَّرتُ قوله تعالى: (والنجمُ والشجرُ يسجدان)، وقوله تعالى: (ولله يسجدُ مَن في السماوات والأرض طوعًا وكَرها وظِلالُهم بالغُدوِّ والآصال)!! لقد وقع في نفسي شعور يقينيٌّ لا يتزحزح، وكأنه صوتٌ مدَوٍّ من داخلي لا أستطيعُ ردُّه: إنَّ هذه الليلة هي ليلةُ القدر. قبل مطلع الفجر بقليل عاد الوضع على ما كان عليه كأنَّه شيئًا ل…
❤56👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dr_jamal_albasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة | د. جمال الباشا الرسمية” (@Dr_jamal_albasha), 4,117 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dr_jamal_albasha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.