Like and repost please

Channel
Dr. Crypto
@Dr_CryptoTechnicalAnalysis
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
106subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001383543396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dr_CryptoTechnicalAnalysis |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dr_CryptoTechnicalAnalysis |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 106 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 107 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 108 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 109 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 109 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 61.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 23.1% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 15.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2023 to 23 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://x.com/_Doctor_Crypto_/status/1761094009613664670?s=20
ILV-USDT
❤1👍1
Currently on the below trade, market is giving a re-entry for all those you want to give it a try. Market is definitely bullish but after a long push, we will probably see a retrace and then further continuation.
That's the amount you need to risk and no matter how small it is, that's your amount, your own personal amount and you should start with that and increase slowly slowly as you feel more and more confident. Small risk, small gain. True but, only if you start small you will succeed in trading. Trading is a psychology game more than anything else. You can do the best Technical analysis and have the best algos but as lon…
🔥1
Only trade with money immaterial to you. But what do you mean immaterial?, money are money. Correct! Immaterial is the amount your brain can still function unbiased instead of panicking and acting on emotion. i.e. it's the amount lost that you are not gonna spend the next days thinking about it all day. You will just shrug your shoulders like you don't care and move on.
Do NOT trade if you are not confident enough and psychologically prepared to see a position move against you or losing part of your money.
My long term holdings are split as follows: 80% in crypto assets and 20% cash. Cash is split to 70% ready to buy a dip if we see one (it will probably come soon otherwise market will push again, it's in strong bullish momentum and dips are for buying now) and 30% for trading.
Hello team, time for an update
https://twitter.com/_Doctor_Crypto_/status/1749447783294079243
👍1
don't risk a lot, market has more room for a drop. Very good risk to reward so I am taking it but risking only a small amount of capital
https://twitter.com/_Doctor_Crypto_/status/1748234745907908647
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dr_CryptoTechnicalAnalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Crypto” (@Dr_CryptoTechnicalAnalysis), 106 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dr_CryptoTechnicalAnalysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.