Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dr. Ben Tapper

@DrTapper

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

10,342subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001163908141
TypeChannel
Username@DrTapper
Created2 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrTapper

Growth

10,34210,39010,3666 August 2026 — 10,390 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,390 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,383 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,378 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,370 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,362 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,346 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,344 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,335–10,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:0410,342-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:4810,344-2
11 Aug 2026, 08:0310,346-16
10 Aug 2026, 05:0110,362-8
9 Aug 2026, 05:0410,370-8
8 Aug 2026, 08:0210,378-5
7 Aug 2026, 07:4710,383-7
6 Aug 2026, 10:1510,390no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4210,390first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.70%
avg views ÷ 10,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
900
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held21 (20 May 202610 August 2026)
Views total7,200
Reactions total263
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13m 43s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

721 reactions across 21 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍721100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 721reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC434 views42 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Five years ago. How is that possible? We knew that the masks would lead to a vaccine…

👍42

5 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC898 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

They sedated trusting beagles, locked their heads in mesh cages, and let sand flies feast on their faces in Tunisia just to watch parasites spread. Where is PETA??? Just another crime committed by FAUCI. If people knew half the crimes committed behind closed doors, there would be a revolution overnight. @drrandpaul

👍34

28 Jul 2026, 03:33 UTC≈1,170 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

We’re going LIVE. Join Senator Rand Paul and me as we discuss Dr. Fauci, the evidence surrounding the pandemic response, and why many people have argued that these actions should be investigated as crimes against humanity. We’ll examine the facts, accountability, and the questions that refuse to go away. Tuesday, Aug. 4 at 10:30 AM Eastern Watch live on YouTube @drbentapper and on X @DrBenTapper1. Don’t miss this i

👍22

20 Jul 2026, 22:21 UTC≈1,010 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://zstacklife.com/?ref=BENTAPPER&utm_source=affiliate

👍9

16 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC910 views62 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Every time I need a reminder to keep standing in the gap and fighting the good fight, I’ll come back to this post. The level of insanity on display is unbelievable.

👍62

13 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC≈1,160 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

WHY NAC? NAC (N-Acetyl Cysteine) is one of my favorite ingredients in Z-DTox because it supports one of the body’s most important antioxidant systems. NAC provides cysteine, a building block the body uses to produce glutathione—often called the body’s “master antioxidant.” Glutathione plays an important role in protecting cells from oxidative stress and supporting normal liver detoxification processes. Think of it th

👍24

10 Jul 2026, 03:38 UTC≈1,350 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Babies are born with low vitamin k for a reason. At birth, cord blood is full of stem cells that go to any damaged sites in the baby where any trauma may have happened during birth. If babies had high levels of Vitamin K at birth, the cord blood wouldn't reach these necessary areas. This is one of the reasons why delayed cord clamping is so important! Additionally, colostrum contains higher concentrations of Vitamin

👍32

10 Jul 2026, 03:38 UTC919 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15%. " -Bill Gates

👍15

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @DrTapper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,158,238 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Ben Tapper” (@DrTapper), 10,342 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrTapper.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.