#با_مخاطبان یکی از سوالات فرم ثبتنام دورههای من اینه: متقاضی چه رشتهای هستید؟ برخی از پاسخها رو ببینیم 😁️️️️️️ @DrRazaviyan
🤣185😁7❤3

Channel
@DrRazaviyan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,114subscribers
+714 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001132286150 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrRazaviyan |
| Description | ✨زکات علم، ترویج آن است✨ 💢بررسی، تحلیل و ارائه نکات کاربردی بیوشیمی، ویژه کنکور کارشناسی ارشد و دکتری💢 @DrRazaviyan_Admin | ادمین💥 |
| Created | 10 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrRazaviyan |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:39 | 8,114 | +14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:38 | 8,100 | +22 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:45 | 8,078 | -12 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 8,090 | +50 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 8,040 | +59 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 7,981 | +48 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:40 | 7,933 | +21 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:51 | 7,912 | +39 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 13:17 | 7,873 | +59 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 7,814 | +39 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 7,775 | +100 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 7,675 | +17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 7,658 | +10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:54 | 7,648 | +15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 7,633 | +18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 7,615 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 7,610 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 7,589 | +19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 7,570 | +16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 7,554 | first reading |
85 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 85 (23 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 55,040 |
| Reactions total | 1,236 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,275 reactions across 84 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,720 | 43.3% | |
| 🤣 | 966 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 582 | 9.27% | |
| 🔥 | 314 | 5.00% | |
| 😭 | 303 | 4.83% | |
| 😁 | 301 | 4.80% | |
| 💔 | 174 | 2.77% | |
| 🤯 | 159 | 2.53% | |
| 🙏 | 128 | 2.04% | |
| 👏 | 112 | 1.78% | |
| 😢 | 98 | 1.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 94 | 1.50% | |
| 🤔 | 61 | 0.972% | |
| 😎 | 37 | 0.59% | |
| 🌚 | 36 | 0.574% | |
| 😱 | 21 | 0.335% | |
| 👀 | 17 | 0.271% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 0.271% | |
| 😡 | 17 | 0.271% | |
| 🕊 | 16 | 0.255% | |
| 14 further kinds | 102 | 1.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,275 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DrRazaviyan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (19.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#با_مخاطبان یکی از سوالات فرم ثبتنام دورههای من اینه: متقاضی چه رشتهای هستید؟ برخی از پاسخها رو ببینیم 😁️️️️️️ @DrRazaviyan
🤣185😁7❤3
امان از سوالات اشتباه در کنکور من تو خونه، پای لپتاپ، با اینترنت، AI، همه نوع تکستبوک و مهمتر از هر چیزی بدون استرس، وقتی با یه سوال غیر استاندارد مواجه میشم کلی روش فکر میکنم، از زوایای مختلف بررسی میکنم، سعی میکنم خط فکری طراح رو بفهمم و القصه ... تهش میبینی سوال کلاً غلط بوده. حالا شما فکر کن یه دانشجو سر جلسه کنکور چقدر ممکنه وقتش بابت فقط یه سوال غلط یا غیر استاندارد هدر بدره و روی عملکرد کلی آزمون اثر ب…
👍213💔66😭20❤14😢12👌5
سلام شبتون بخیر سوال دیگهای از بیوشیمی اگه به نظرتون ایراد داره زیر این پست بگید امشب بررسی میکنم. @DrRazaviyan
❤19💔1🙏1
بابت سوال ۶۵ مجموعه تغذیه حرفی برای گفتن ندارم! هارپر 2026 صفحه 60 ستون سمت چپ پاراگراف دوم آنزیمهای خانواده آسپارتیلپروتئاز شامل پپسین، کاتپسین و HIV پروتئاز. بعد از یک روز کاری و یه کلاس آنلاین سنگین و ساعت حدود سه بامداد من خیلی خستهم امیدوارم این چیزی که میبینم اشتباه من باشه ... @DrRazaviyan
❤25🤯6😢4
سوال ۱۲ مجموعه علوم آزمایشگاهی یک گزینه ۲ نیز صحیح میباشد. مراجع: ۱. بیوشیمی هارپر، ویراست سیوسوم (2026) صفحه 230 ستون سمت چپ، پاراگراف دوم دِفسفریلاسیون (برای مثال توسط انسولین) موجب تقویت فعالیت آن (استیلکوآ کربوکسیلاز) میشود. ۲. بیوشیمی هارپر، ویراست سیودوم (2023) صفحه 238 ستون سمت چپ، پاراگراف چهارم، خط آخر دِفسفریلاسیون (برای مثال توسط انسولین) موجب تقویت فعالیت آن (استیلکوآ کربوکسیلاز) میشود. ۳. بیوشی…
❤16
سوال ۱۱ مجموعه علوم آزمایشگاهی یک تمامی گزینهها صحیح هستند. مراجع: ۱. بیوشیمی هارپر، 2026 صفحه 290 شکل 20-29 از کاتابولیسم لوسین استیلکوآ و استواستات تولید میشود. ۲. بیوشیمی لنینجر، ویراست ششم صفحه 718 شکل 21-18 از کاتابولیسم تریپتوفان پیروات و استیلکوآ حاصل میشود. @DrRazaviyan
❤14😁2
سوال ۱۰ مجموعه علوم آزمایشگاهی یک گزینه یک نیز صحیح میباشد. مراجع: ۱. بیوشیمی لنینجر، 2021 (شماره صفحهش رو ندارم). شکل 6-15 حضور Glucose transporter در غشاء ER ۲. بیوشیمی لنینجر، 2013 صفحه 615 شکل 30-15 حضور Glucose transporter در غشاء ER ۳. بیوشیمی Garrett، ویراست 6، 2016 صفحه 761 شکل 22.5 حضور Glucose transporter در غشاء ER ۴. بیوشیمی Stryer، ویراست هشتم صفحه 481 شکل 16.28 حضور Glucose transporter در غشاء ER …
❤19
سلام شبتون بخیر کلید اولیه اومده (خودم هنوز ندیدم البته) هر سوال بیوشیمی از هر مجموعه و رشتهای اگر فکر میکنید نیاز به بررسی داره زیر این پست برام بنویسید. امشب میبینم و راهنمایی میکنم. تکراری نگین لطفاً، یکی هم بگه قبوله 😊 @DrRazaviyan
❤32
#با_مخاطبان استاد سلام وقت بخیر میخوام طومار بنویسم، خواهش میکنم حتما بخونید 😂😂😂 من فارغ از نتیجه کنکور خیلی به شما مدیونم اینو کاملا جدی میگم از اولین بار که تو بله بهتون پیام دادم و یادمه سلام نکردم و گفتین سلامت کو 😂 تا الان که دارم این پیام رو مینویسم و امیدوارم آخرین بار نباشه 🥲 دلم واستون خیلی تنگ میشه من متقاضی زیر گروه ۲ هماتو بودم و خدا رو شکر بیوشیمی ۶۵ زدم درسته ساده بود ولی خب استاد بیوشیمی من از فرور…
❤115❤🔥19👍4🕊4💘2🤔1
#سه_تار چهارمضراب شور اثر استاد جلال ذوالفنون به وقت ۸ آبان پایان ماراتن کنکور کارشناسی ارشد وزارت بهداشت سال ۱۴۰۵ https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfIZhspMmQK/?vrfl=aG5tcTdvOXVjeTVo @DrRazaviyan
❤109❤🔥11🤣6💔3😁3🔥2
#با_مخاطبان سلام و عرض ادب وقت شما بخیر باشه استاد من دانشجوی کلاس آفلاین شما بودم و جدا از اینکه حیف و صد حیف که جذابیتهای کلاس آنلاین رو از دست دادم، وظیفه خودم دونستم از شما صمیمانه تشکر کنم واقعا شما فارغ از توانمندیها و شایستگیهاتون در حوزه تدریس، بسیار انسان شریف و بزرگواری هستید و این همه لطفی که به ما دانشجویان داشتید هرگز فراموش نمیشه من با کلید شما از بیوشیمی درصد ۸۸ رو کسب کردم (البته که پوششدهی جزوه …
❤39🔥5🫡1
#با_مخاطبان سلام استاد وقتتون بخیر خواستم بابت تدریس عالی و زحماتتون ازتون تشکر کنم واقعاً برای منی که از پایه تقریباً صفر بیوشیمی رو شروع کرده بودم کلاسها و جزوات شما خیلی کمککننده بود و نقش زیادی در یادگیری این درس برام داشت امیدوارم همیشه در کنار خانواده محترمتون سالم و سلامت باشید و روزبهروز افراد بیشتری بتونن از کلاسها و جزوات ارزشمندتون بهرهمند بشن براتون آرزوی بهترینها رو دارم 🌹 @DrRazaviyan
❤24👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @DrRazaviyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 2 posts on @DrRazaviyan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
فرم فعال تمامی آنزیمهای زیر توسط تریپسین ایجاد میشود، بهجز:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تمامی اسیدهای آمینه زیر هیدروفیلیک هستند؛ بهجزء؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تمامی آمینو اسیدهای زیر در ساختار خود حاوی حلقهی آروماتیک هستند، بهجز؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال علمی آموزشی دکتر رضویان” (@DrRazaviyan), 8,114 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrRazaviyan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.