Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Landing Pod «Dr. Mann-04»

Channel

Landing Pod «Dr. Mann-04»

@DrMann_and_Kipp_GoM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004360584268
TypeChannel
Username@DrMann_and_Kipp_GoM
Created27 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrMann_and_Kipp_GoM

Growth

46510 August 2026 — 6 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4 subscribers10 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 37 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 21:414-1
31 Aug 2026, 21:045-1
12 Aug 2026, 20:326no change
10 Aug 2026, 11:016first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026

⟫ 🥹Convo🥹 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «Доктор, смотрите — судя по графику и анализу, эта часть видоизменяется медленно. Можно сходить туда и изучить ее доскональней» ⟬🌟⟭ — «Та, что юго-восточнее первой зоны? Вижу... Нам бы по-хорошему продолжить записывать все связанное с геологией, у нас с этим проблемы. Сам просчитался — сам страдаю. Иронично, кхм» ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «Что касательно моих архивных функций? Я все прекрасно "помню", если м

9 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026

⟫ 🥹Convo🥹 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⟬🌟⟭ — «Значит так: проверим данные первого и третьего зондов, дай их сюда, а после бури пойдем за вторым и четвертым. Они должны были собрать уже достаточно» ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «Нет. Второй и четвертый будут готовы примерно через два местных дня. Мы могли бы изменить окна первого и третьего для большей эффективности, если Вы хотите» ⟬🌟⟭ — «Допустим поставим их ниже, а куда именно. Любая местность может легко

6 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌟| | «LAZARUS 4» | |🪐 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🥹⟬🌟⟭ — «Работает? Что там обычно говорят при проверке, "Приём" и "Раз-раз"? В любой другой ситуации я бы не стал заниматься подобным, если бы не мой приемник, который давно не подавал признаки жизни и по логике не должен. Какой бы глупой затеей не было отправление сообщения, я вожусь с ним (И до чего я докатился). Я не знаю, откуда пришел сигнал, не знаю дойдет ли туда эта аудиозапись,

1 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⟫ 🥹Convo🥹 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «Вы уверены, что изучение этого явления — не простая трата времени? Вы сами упоминали, что время и ресурсы для нас одинаково равны и востребованы» ⟬🌟⟭ — «Безусловно. Но, почему бы не разбавить рутину чем-то кроме сбора проб и замера всяких параметров, чем мы занимаемся уже, кажется, чуть больше года» ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «Земные один год, три месяца и два дня, не считая Ваши погружения в криосон во врем

👍2

28 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⟫ 🥹Convo🥹 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⟬🌟⟭ — «Эй, KIPP, ты уверен, что он не был сломан? Я уже несколько часов копаюсь в электронике, но есть много нюансов почему это невозможно» ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «Дайте мне взглянуть» ⟬🌟⟭ — «Я проверил — все по какой-то причине работает как часы. Проанализируй пока само сообщение» ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «Это просто белый шум. Частота та же, вполне возможно, что мы просто поймали радиоволны из космоса» ⟬🌟⟭ — «Ох. Так быстро?» ⟬

👍1

28 Jul 2026, 05:55 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026

⟫ 🥹Convo🥹 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «. . .Доктор, на приемник пришел сигнал» ⟬🌟⟭ — «. . .Да быть того не может! Какая у тебя настройка юмора?» ⟬ 🌟 ⟭ ➢ «Это не розыгрыш и не шутка. Вам лучше взглянуть самолично» ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🥹#message

27 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

┏➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➿If darkness is only ➿the absence of ➿light, ➿If cold is only ➿the absence of ➿heat, ➿If silence is only ➿the absence of ➿sound, ➿If death is simply ➿the absence of life, ➿Then good is the ➿absence of evil, or ➿evil is the absence ➿of good? ┣➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➿Receiver frequency ➿Rules ➿Life? 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺? ➿Good ol' memories ┣➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➿#message #one_way_convo ➿#convo #paranormal_events ┣➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩 - supp! cr: official Abso

27 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC18 viewsread 12 August 2026

🥹🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🥹 🥹🤩🤩🅰️ut 🤩🥹🤩🤩🤩🅰️obody 🤩🤩🥹🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🅰️ame. 🤩🤩🤩🥹 🤩🤩🤩🤩🥹 ┣━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @DrMann_and_Kipp_GoM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Landing Pod «Dr. Mann-04»” (@DrMann_and_Kipp_GoM), 4 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrMann_and_Kipp_GoM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.