Video, posted without a caption
🔥5

Channel
@DrKarmanchikov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
643subscribers
+37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002694368875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrKarmanchikov |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrKarmanchikov |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:34 | 643 | +5 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 638 | +10 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 628 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 627 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 621 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 612 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 610 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 606 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 606 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
334 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 156 | 46.7% | |
| 🔥 | 102 | 30.5% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 13.8% | |
| 😨 | 7 | 2.10% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.80% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.20% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.20% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.599% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.599% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.299% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.299% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.299% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.299% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.299% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 334 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2025 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
🔥5
Коллеги, приглашаем вас на вебинар «Объемный лифтинг в жаркий сезон: протокол от глубокой мышечной коррекции до качества кожи». Дата и время: 16 июня 2026 г., 11:00 ч. (по МСК) Спикер: врач-дерматовенеролог, косметолог, трихолог, лазеротерапевт, сертифицированный клинический тренер компании Stellar Med ̶ Карманчиков Владимир Сергеевич. Темы вебинара: • Лето ≠ пауза. Какие процедуры действительно безопасны…
🔥3❤2❤🔥1
🧪 RF-лифтинг: Монополярный vs Игольчатый. Разбор отличий с доказательной базой Коллеги, часто приходится слышать вопрос: что лучше выбрать пациенту - «объемный» прогрев монополяром или микроиглы? На самом деле, это два разных инструмента с разными показаниями. Я подготовил сравнительный анализ на основе данных научных исследований (включая свежие работы 2025 года из *Nature*). Сохраняйте в закладки. ⚡️ Главное отл…
🔥28❤22👍8
✨ Дорогие друзья! Поздравляю вас с наступающим праздником! Пусть новый год принесет исполнение всех ваших мечт, здоровье крепким и неиссякаемый поток новых знаний. Желаю каждому из вас удачи, радости и вдохновения в новом году! Пусть всё задуманное сбудется, а рядом всегда будут любимые и близкие люди. Счастливого и яркого праздника!
❤30🔥5🥰5👍2🎄1
❕КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ КЕЙС Пациентка, 27 лет. (сканограмма и фото в комментариях) Обратилась на приём с запросом на игольчатый RF зоны лица и шеи - лифтинг и улучшение качества кожи. ❕ Важно: В своей практике я ввёл обязательную УЗ-диагностику в рамках первичной консультации. И именно она в этом случае стала ключевой. Что мы увидели на УЗИ: ▪️ SMAS-слой: ∙ ухудшение состояния ∙ усиленная гипоэхогенность ∙ признаки «отслойки» …
❤26👍2
🚨 Во сколько лет нужно начинать делать процедуры, направленные на лифтинг (борьба с птозом, «брылями», «вторым подбородком»)? На просторах соцсетей бегает уйма информации, что эти процедуры нужно делать после 45 лет. 📱 Многие СМИ бездумно копируют такие посты, не уважают их хоть капельки экспертизы или сомнений. Абсолютный бред! 😤 (Вы бы ещё пациентов рекомендовали приходить после 60 лет «ах да и такие, к сожалению,…
👍7❤5⚡1
Обучение г. Кропоткин (Краснодарский край) новому моему протоколу «УЗИ перед игольчатым RF + HIFU SMAS» ♦️для прогнозирования результатов процедур ♦️создание персонализированного протокола процедур
🔥14❤8
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥18❤1🤣1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9😨7😱1
8-45 ( с учетом задержки 13 часов)лететь до Омска , наверное самый мой длинный маршрут по России
😱3💔2🤯1😢1
Что лучше ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Немного из жизни клинического тренера в условиях современной логистики ) Часть 1
❤6🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DrKarmanchikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что лучше ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2025 to 28 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Карманчиков Владимир | Аппаратная косметология” (@DrKarmanchikov), 643 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrKarmanchikov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.