Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فرشاد محبی | مشاور ارشد سیب ترش

Channel

فرشاد محبی | مشاور ارشد سیب ترش

@DrFarshadMohebbi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,271subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002650221717
TypeChannel
Username@DrFarshadMohebbi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrFarshadMohebbi

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

8,380 average views per post against 5,271 subscribers — an engagement rate of 158.9%. Across the 12,160 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.59% and 22.8%, with a median of 11.9%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured22 of 22 published in the window (2 exact, 20 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled184,288
Mature posts only180.7% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers5,271 measured 14 August 2026
Cohortb3162:fas · 12,160 channels · p10 2.52% · p25 5.59% · p50 11.9% · p75 22.8% · p90 39.0%
Position in cohort99.490th percentile · 13.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.067% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,2625,3085,2857 August 2026 — 5,308 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,308 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,298 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,262 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,271 subscribers5,2717 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,255–5,315 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:345,271+9
11 Aug 2026, 08:435,262-36
8 Aug 2026, 13:425,298-10
7 Aug 2026, 17:475,308no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:375,308first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
158.9%
avg views ÷ 5,271 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,380
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.788%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (12 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total184,288
Reactions total1,452
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,564 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
72746.5%
😍41126.3%
👍1308.31%
🤯1117.10%
😎774.92%
😁452.88%
😢382.43%
🔥130.831%
😱120.767%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,564reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC766 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

چه دقتی 😁 اینجا اتاق خانم دکتره(مهشید😁❤️) بچه‌ها قبل از اینکه بیان برای درمان براش نقاشی میکشن و میارن

41🔥2😍2😁1

11 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC772 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💌 پیام جدید 📨 تعداد پاسخ‌گویی: "0" 👤 آیدی کاربر: #GdmBiXwBQMeemFR3 🏷️ نام کاربر: F 📝 تعداد کل پیام کاربر: 2 👀 تعداد کل پاسخ‌گویی به کاربر: 1 🗓 تاریخ: سه‌شنبه ۲۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ ✍🏻 چی گفته؟ سلام ببخشید این نقاشیا برای چیه؟

21😍5

11 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC≈1,780 views107 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

86😁18🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC≈7,340 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026

سلام عزیزانم ❌فعلا دنبال رتبه و تراز نباشید و فقط دوره کنین ولی قسمت آخر سوال خیلی مهمه ✅استراتژی کنکور 🥇یه اولویت‌بندی براتون میذارم که دستتون بیاد چه فصلایی مهمتره ◀️بر اساس راحتی دوره و‌ جمعبندی و حجم بودجه‌ای که از سوالای کنکور به خودش اختصاص میده

73😢3👍1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈7,200 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💌 پیام جدید ✍🏻 چی گفته؟ سلام آقای محبی تورخدا قسمت میدم که جوابمو بدید دارم از استرس زیاد می‌میرم: 1) حداقل«بدترین» رتبه لازم برای پرستاری سراسری در منطقه 3 ؟ 2) حداقل«بدترین» رتبه لازم برای پرستاری آزاد در منطقه 3؟ 2)حداقل«بدترین» رتبه لازم برای پیرا پزشکی هایی «مثل فیزیو‌تراپی و گفتار درمانی و کاردرمانی» های آزاد منطقه 3؟ «برای استراتیژی کنکور میخوام اینارو»

🤯317👍5

29 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC≈28,600 views448 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

❤️رشته دندون غیر از جراحی این زیبایی‌ها رو هم داره 👶اینکه یه بچه کوچولو بیاد و فکر کنه داریم باهاش بازی میکنیم از قشنگیا و ارکان اصلی کار اطفاله 😂که از توان من خارجه و کار رو سپردم دست مهشید خانم

😍39436😁15🔥1😎1😢1

29 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC≈9,190 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بچه‌ها ◀️من دیروز راجع به حساب نکردن تراز صحبت کردم ولی خیلی پیام داده بودین که تراز و رتبه شما رو پیش‌بینی کنم 🤯پاسخ به این پیام‌ها چیزی جز استرس نداره تمرکز کنین روی برنامتون و فقط بخونین بدون حساب کتاب بخونین 🫡سعی میکنم پیام‌های دیگه غیر از مضمون حساب کردن تراز رو تا جای ممکن پاسخ بدم

32👍4🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC≈8,420 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💌 پیام جدید 📨 تعداد پاسخ‌گویی: "0" 👤 آیدی کاربر: # 🏷️ نام کاربر: آبی 📝 تعداد کل پیام کاربر: 👀 تعداد کل پاسخ‌گویی به کاربر: 🗓 تاریخ: سه‌شنبه ۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ ✍🏻 چی گفته؟ https://t.me/siiibtorsh/57902 واقعا باعث اشکم شد پیامتون:) راه سختی بود. برای پشت کنکوریای امسالم یک جور دیگه سخت بود. امید و نا امیدیای پی در پی.. درک میکنم جملتونو وقتی گفتیو تمرکز روی مسیر.. واقعا هم همینه! ادم با فکر به نتیجه و در نهایت کمال

👍269😍1

29 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC≈5,790 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💌 پیام جدید 🏷️ نام کاربر: آتنا ✍🏻 چی گفته؟ سلام وقتتون بخیر، بی نهایت ممنونم از ویسی که در کانال سیب ترش گذاشتید برای محاسبه تراز 🌸🎀🦋 💌 پیام جدید 🏷️ نام کاربر: ⋆ 𝒜𝓋𝒾𝓃 ⋆ ✍🏻 چی گفته؟ دکتر سلام بینهایت و صمیمانه ازتون بابت ویس ممنونم واقعا بهش نیازداشتم لطف شما🫡

8👍1🔥1😍1

29 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC≈5,370 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💌 پیام جدید 📨 تعداد پاسخ‌گویی: 👤 آیدی کاربر: 🏷️ نام کاربر: 𝑨.𝑴.𝟖𝟕 📝 تعداد کل پیام کاربر: 3 👀 تعداد کل پاسخ‌گویی به کاربر: 1 🗓 تاریخ: سه‌شنبه ۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ ✍🏻 چی گفته؟ سلام دکتر خسته نباشین راستش منم مثل بعضی از دوستان اومدم نمره هامو چک کردم و متاسفانه رفتم تخمین زدم و تراز به شدت بد شد و تماما نا امید شده بودم و واقعا ممکن بود هویت رو خراب کنم یا حتی سلامت و شیمی رو چون گفتم دیگه قبول نمیشم درحالی که اصلا ه

19

28 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC≈11,400 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💌 پیام جدید 🏷️ نام کاربر: rooz ✍🏻 چی گفته؟ https://t.me/DrFarshadMohebbi/658 سلام من عضو کانالتون نیستم و توی سیب ترش چنلتون رو تازه دیدم ، تو شرایطی این پیامتون رو دیدم که میخواستم دیگه جا بزنم با وجود تمام سختی‌هایی که کشیدم اما انگار حکمت این بوده پیامتون رو اتفاقی ببینم و بگم هنوز شانسی برا من هست حتی اگه یه درصد هم باشه من ادامه میدم هرچند دست و پا شکسته و پابرهنه . ممنونم ازتون❤️ لطف شماست🫡

23

28 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC≈10,500 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

شما امتحانتونو تموم کردین ما هم پیروزمندانه جراحی رو تموم کردیم😬🫡

😎7220🔥3😍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @DrFarshadMohebbi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 218,111 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فرشاد محبی | مشاور ارشد سیب ترش” (@DrFarshadMohebbi), 5,271 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrFarshadMohebbi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.