Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr.Elizaveta о здоровье изнутри

Channel

Dr.Elizaveta о здоровье изнутри

@DrElizavetaO

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,846subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001618729260
TypeChannel
Username@DrElizavetaO
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DrElizavetaO

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,8466,9036,874.57 August 2026 — 6,903 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,903 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,902 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,894 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,887 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,886 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,888 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,889 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,882 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,874 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,872 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,869 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,863 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,850 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,846 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,837–6,912 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:186,846-4
14 Sept 2026, 06:176,850-13
10 Sept 2026, 16:016,863-6
5 Sept 2026, 22:026,869-3
2 Sept 2026, 06:246,872-2
30 Aug 2026, 03:266,874-8
26 Aug 2026, 16:436,882-7
23 Aug 2026, 06:336,889+1
20 Aug 2026, 05:036,888+2
16 Aug 2026, 21:586,886-1
13 Aug 2026, 11:236,887-7
10 Aug 2026, 20:446,894-8
7 Aug 2026, 23:356,902-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:476,903no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:396,903first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 23s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

301 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23076.4%
👍5016.6%
🔥144.65%
💘30.997%
👏20.664%
🤔10.332%
🥰10.332%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DrElizavetaO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC193 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026

СПКЯ, инсулинорезистентность и тирзепатид СПКЯ часто воспринимают только как проблему яичников: нерегулярный цикл, отсутствие овуляции, акне, повышенный тестостерон, рост волос по мужскому типу. Однако 👇🏻 Международные рекомендации 2023 года называют инсулинорезистентность одним из ключевых патофизиологических механизмов СПКЯ. Ткани яичников хуже реагируют на инсулин, поэтому поджелудочная железа выделяет его бол

👍7🥰1

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

19 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC264 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @FacesclinicPhoto

Всего за 6 процедур Icoone Laser удалось заметно улучшить качество тканей, рельеф кожи и контуры тела. Пациент косметолога-эстетиста Анастасии Фоминой. 📞 8(988) 248-30-33 👤 Клиника эстетической медицины «ЛИЦА» Краснодар, ул. Комсомольская, 8

4🔥1

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

19 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC339 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Мои пациенты не стареют 🥹 Запись на прием 8988-248-30-33

6👍5

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

18 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC415 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Кожа как у дельфина - упругая, гладкая и гидратированная с помощью Belotero revive Запись на прием 8988-248-30-33

8

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

18 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC437 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Круговорот биохакинга 🌀😀 А пройти чекап можно уже сейчас с моим чеклистом «Анализы», который идет в подарок каждому, кто приобрел методичку «Жизнь в балансе» 🥹 https://preventme.ru/lifeinbalancelid

16

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

15 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC541 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Мелазма и принципы терапии Запись на прием 8988-248-30-33

9

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

14 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC608 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Главный витамин при аллергии 👆🏻 Хотите знать, какой витамин С и какая доза будет эффективна при тех или иных состояниях организма (ОРЗ, аллергия, запоры, стресс, анемия, дефицит железа, молодость кожи, подвижность суставов и др), а так же получить ссылки на работающие БАД, переходите по по ссылке https://preventme.ru/lifeinbalancelid

👍84

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

13 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC475 views28 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие, нужны ваши голоса, чтобы я могла публиковать интересные истории в этом канале 🥹 https://t.me/boost/DrElizavetaO

28

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

13 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC486 views23 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

КОК - синтетические гормоны в очень больших дозах. Именно за счет этого в яичниках перестают созревать фолликулы, не происходит овуляция, не формируется желтое тело, нет беременности и нет своих родных гормонов 🤷‍♀️ Говорить, что КОК нормализуют гормональный фон неверно, так как никакого гормонального фона при приеме КОК нет! Они создают видимость мнимого благополучия, а проблема остается. ЗГТ - это биоидентичные го

23

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

11 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC539 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Синтетические прогестины в составе КОК и опухоли мозга: наука проснулась То, что когда-то казалось страшилками из интернета, сегодня признано официальной медициной. Масштабные исследования (в частности, французской когорты SNDS, более 100 000 женщин) расставили точки над i: некоторые синтетические прогестины в контрацептивах повышают риск менингиомы - опухоли оболочек мозга - в разы. Риск растет с дозой и стажем п

20

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

11 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC516 views16 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @FacesclinicPhoto

При лечении акне не существует универсальной процедуры. Лучший результат дает грамотно подобранная комбинация методик, которая воздействует сразу на несколько причин заболевания. Делимся клиническим примером. Пациент главного врача Риммы Александровны Минасьян. 📞8(988) 248-30-33 👤Клиника эстетической медицины «ЛИЦА» Краснодар, ул. Комсомольская, 8

👍96💘1

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

7 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC519 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Вы не согласны со мной? Тогда вы не согласны с Международным агентством по изучению рака 🤷‍♀️ • Запись ко мне на прием в @facesclinic по тел. 8988-248-30-33

13👍3💘2

Signed Елизавета Охремчук

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DrElizavetaO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ирина Баранова🇷🇺 Врач anti-age
@baranovaia · 31,476
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr.Elizaveta о здоровье изнутри” (@DrElizavetaO), 6,846 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrElizavetaO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.