Channel
@DrAkramNadwi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,226subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001245569023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrAkramNadwi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrAkramNadwi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 5,226 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 5,225 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,437 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
بسم اللّه الرحمن الرحيم تفرّد: علمی انفرادیت اور اس کی اصولی حیثیت از: ڈاكٹر محمد اكرم ندوى آكسفورڈ 14/8/2026 اسلامی علمی روایت میں اختلافِ رائے ایک مسلم اور ناگزیر حقیقت ہے۔ فقہ، حدیث، اصولِ فقہ، تفسیر اور دیگر علوم کی تاریخ کا مطالعہ کیا جائے تو معلوم ہوتا ہے کہ اہلِ علم کے درمیان اختلاف محض اتفاقی امر نہیں بلکہ اجتہاد کی فطرت کا لازمی تقاضا ہے۔ نصوص کے فہم، دلالات کے تعین، تعارضِ ادلہ کے حل، اصولی قواعد کے …
تفرّد فی الرأی یہی اصول فقہی اور فکری آرا پر بھی منطبق ہوتا ہے۔ تفرّد فی الرأی سے مراد یہ ہے کہ کسی فقیہ، محدث، اصولی یا مفکر نے کسی مسئلے میں ایسا موقف اختیار کیا ہو جو دوسرے اہلِ علم کے ہاں معروف یا مقبول نہ ہو، یا وہ اس مسئلے میں اپنے معاصرین سے منفرد ہو۔ یہ قسمِ تفرّد اسلامی علمی روایت میں نہایت عام ہے۔ اگر فقہ کی تاریخ کا غیر جانب دارانہ مطالعہ کیا جائے تو معلوم ہوگا کہ تقریباً ہر بڑے فقیہ کے ہاں متعدد ایسے اقوا…
علمی نقد کا صحیح منہج کسی متفرد قول کا جائزہ لینے کے لیے چند بنیادی سوالات سامنے رکھنے چاہییں: اولاً، اس قول کی دلیل کیا ہے؟ ثانیاً، اس دلیل کی صحت اور دلالت کا درجہ کیا ہے؟ ثالثاً، کیا اس کے مقابلے میں کوئی زیادہ قوی نص یا دلیل موجود ہے؟ رابعاً، کیا صاحبِ قول نے کسی معتبر اصولِ استدلال کی بنیاد پر یہ رائے اختیار کی ہے؟ خامساً، کیا اس قول کی مخالفت محض کثرتِ قائلین کی وجہ سے ہے یا مخالفین کے پاس واقعی قوی تر دلائل مو…
*موسیقی* (فقہی اختلاف اور دعوتِ اسلام) — ڈاکٹر محمد اکرم ندوی (آکسفورڈ) https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DSmczfx4w/
وجلسنا في الساحة نشاهد عرض الصوت والضوء، فامتزجت أمامنا أضواء الحاضر بظلال الماضي، وكأن سمرقند أرادت أن تستعيد في تلك اللحظات بعضًا من تاريخها الطويل، وأن تعرضه للزائر في صورة جديدة. وكنت أفكر وأنا أنظر إلى تلك المباني: كم من عالم جلس هنا؟ وكم من طالب حفظ كتابًا، وقرأ فلسفة أو هندسة أو علم الأفلاك، وناقش مسألة، ثم خرج إلى الدنيا يحمل من العلم ما يضيء به طريقه وطريق غيره؟ واتجه رفاقي بعد ذلك إلى بعض المطاعم للعشاء، أم…
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم رحلة أوزبكستان (43) يوم الخميس 30 صفر سنة 1448ه بقلم: د. محمد أكرم الندوي أوكسفورد اشتغلت بعد الفجر بالتفسير، ثم تناولت الفطور مع الجماعة في مطعم الفندق، وكان الصباح في طشقند هادئًا لطيفًا، كأن المدينة لم تستيقظ بعد إلا على مهل، وكأنها تستعد ليوم جديد من أيامها الطويلة التي شهدت من تقلّب الدول وتعاقب الحضارات ما لا يكاد يحصيه التاريخ. خرجنا من الفندق في الساعة السابعة والنصف صباحًا متوجهين…
ورأيت نحو ذلك هنا في بعض المباني القديمة، فقد رأينا موضعًا يسمى "ضرب دار"، أي دار الضرب التي كانت تضرب فيها الدنانير والدراهم، فذهب بعضهم إلى تفسير الاسم على أنه "سر بدار"، أي "الرأس على الصليب"، وربطه بلقب الفدائيين الذين خرجوا لقتال المغول. ومثل هذه الاشتقاقات قد تبدو لأول وهلة طريفة، ولكنها في الحقيقة تكشف عن مشكلة أعمق: مشكلة الاشتغال بالكلمات من غير معرفة بأصولها وتاريخها وتطورها. فاللغة ليست لعبة من الحروف، ولا…
Photo from Mohammad Akram
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. *The Station of Ablution (Maqam-e-Wudu)* By: Dr. Muhammad Akram Nadwi Oxford 12/8/2026 In the world of Sufism, "Hal" (transient spiritual state) and "Maqam" (permanent spiritual station) are two fundamental terms, and the entire edifice of mystical conduct and spiritual training is, to some degree, tied to these two concepts. For the Sufis, neither can th…
Whether it is Junayd al-Baghdadi, Shibli, Dhul-Nun al-Misri, Imam Ghazali, Shaykh Abdul Qadir al-Jilani, Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, Khwaja Bahauddin Naqshband, or Shaykh Shihabuddin Suhrawardi—the greatness of these luminaries was not in such claims, but rather in their piety, sincerity, servitude, knowledge, struggle, and reformation of souls. This discussion is actually a prelude to a vast topic concerning stations…
Perhaps the reason is that true greatness does not contain noise. In it, claims are few and servitude is abundant; display is less and sincerity is more; steadfastness exceeds miracles, and piety surpasses mystical unveilings. Wudu is the most beautiful symbol of this silent greatness. In it, a person says nothing, yet conveys so much. He takes the water, washes his limbs, silently turns his attention to his Lord, an…
For more articles by Dr. Muhammad Akram Nadwi, Oxford, join the channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbAxp2qGpLHHqQ3LoY0w
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DrAkramNadwi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,426,868 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمد أكرم الندوي” (@DrAkramNadwi), 5,226 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrAkramNadwi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.