Channel
@Doubler_2x_Project
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
132subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001393542982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Doubler_2x_Project |
| Created | Between 1 August 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Doubler_2x_Project |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 132 | -2 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 134 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 135 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 135 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 136 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Today my payment pending im leaving this project https://crypto-rocket.ltd 🚀wait for new round🔥 ❤️Stay with us! i am trying to share legit and profitable project as always https://t.me/Doubler_2x_Project1
BIT-FIRE 2ND ROUND 🔥 BIT FIRE Admin🔥 ☑️ All Tron payment received ✅ Agai reinvest done 💎 Min Invest : 1 Usd 💲 Deposit Method : Trx doge ☑️Profit : 200% in 24hrs 🌐 Web site - https://crypto-rocket.ltd/?ref=24607 ⛔️NOTE ⚠️Invest what you can afford to lose ⚠️Cheat referral not Paid 🙏don't invest more than 3$ 🎲don't invest smeared system
🔥 BIT-FIRE 2ND ROUND 🔥 ❇️ Total Deposit : 150 TRX 💹 Profit : +200% After 24 hours 🌐Project Link :- https://crypto-rocket.ltd/?ref=24607 If you are a single investor invest TRX 20/30
🔥🔥Bit fire new round 🔥🔥 ✅today deposit payment received Bitcoin also added👍 🖇️ ReGisTraTion Link 👇: https://crypto-rocket.ltd/?ref=24607
(bit fire admin) after 5 days dogecoin withdrawal paid😍🔥
Doubler industry is now very bad. Both dubai admin and bit fire admin did the same thing by paying only trx on the first day and cheated the investors after getting the deposits. Unfortunately it's the time to leave the doubler industry now. There is no good admin left. All are trying to scam investor money. So do not invest in these fake sites. https://crypto-rocket.ltd/scam
BIT FIRE ADMIN FOLLOW DUBAI ADMIN LTC BTC DOGE SCAM OR NOT🤔(You decide)🔥
https://crypto-favorite.ltd/📞This project is closed ,now we are moving forward and waiting for something new ❤️Stay with us! i am trying to share legit and profitable project as always https://t.me/Doubler_2x_Project1
After waiting 378 day Dubai admin launch his project we are expecting alot well performance by him but he is not paying any of ltc doge and btc all people are losing.. it's pretty obvious all are sad because all were waiting for Dubai admin so long https://crypto-covert.ltd/closed1stround It's a very sad moment we didn't expect such a worst response from Dubai anyway we can't stay here let's move on
🔥 BIT FIRE Admin🔥 ☑️ All Tron payment received ✅ Agai reinvest done 💎 Min Invest : 1 Usd 💲 Deposit Method : Trx doge Ltc ☑️Profit : 200% in 24hrs 🌐 Web site - https://crypto-rocket.ltd/?ref=24607 ⛔️NOTE ⚠️Invest what you can afford to lose ⚠️Cheat referral not Paid 🙏don't invest more than 3$ 🎲don't invest smeared system
1st Day Deposit Payment Received From CROWN ADMIN (+19USD)❤️✌️ ✅Running Days | 02 💹Status | Paying ✅Again Reinvest | +4$ 💠Deposit Method💠 ❇️ PM|TRX|BTC|DOGE|LTC|ETH ☑️Invest 3$ = Get 6$ 🌐Site: https://crypto-favorite.ltd/?ref=556587580 ☑️ If You Received Your Payment TheN Don't Forget To Reinvest🔥 🔥Stay With Us🚀 https://t.me/Doubler_2x_Project1
☑️🔥 BIT-FIRE Admin New Doubler Lounched🔥 💹 Profit : +200% After 24 Hours! 🚼 Running Days- 00 Days🚀 ✅My Active Deposit - 30$ 📤 Min Deposit : 1 USD 💠Deposit Method💠 ✅BTC-LTC-TRX-DOGE-PM✅ 🌐 Link https://crypto-rocket.ltd/?ref=24607 💠NOTE💠 ⚠️ Invest Always Own Your Risk ⚠️ Don't Invest More Than 5$ ⚠️ Multiple Account Banned
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Doubler_2x_Project. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEGIT CRYPTO DOUBLER” (@Doubler_2x_Project), 132 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Doubler_2x_Project.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.