Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dongistan 🛢️

@Dongistan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

336subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001790633524
TypeChannel
Username@Dongistan
DescriptionDongistan's peripheral propaganda outlet. Subreddit channel: https://t.me/DongistanSub
Created10 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Dongistan

Growth

3367 Aug 2026, 11:20 — 336 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:04 — 336 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:208 Aug 2026, 07:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 335–337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:04336no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:20336first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,660
Videos
145
Links
45

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

312 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁9530.4%
👏3310.6%
💔268.33%
🤡268.33%
👎227.05%
🖕227.05%
🔥216.73%
🤣165.13%
👍154.81%
😢154.81%
😴92.88%
30.962%
💯30.962%
🫡20.641%
🌚10.321%
👌10.321%
🤔10.321%
🤮10.321%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2024 to 27 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Mar 2025, 00:20 UTC619 viewsread 8 August 2026

To effectively govern at the helm of the modern state machinery requires making difficult choices that benefit your population in the long term, at the expense of the pain and suffering of some in the short term. All of Syria's minorities had grievances with Assad. It just seems like Sunni Arabs hated him the most because they're in the majority. Only because of that did Syrias other minorities see him as the lesser

27 Mar 2025, 00:20 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 8 August 2026

What makes ‘the people’ an authority is not when a populations’ votes are tallied up, but when they become something on behalf of which armies can be raised, mobilized, and materially sustained (by populations, being fed and quartered, etc.). The foundation of popular sovereignty is not electoralism, but the ability for a state to facilitate and realize the social contract: An extent to which the impersonal reality o

27 Mar 2025, 00:20 UTC≈1,150 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

It is evidently the case that the Arab nationalist form of modernism was a failure. exclusions reinforce the very tribal parochialisms that the nationalists wanted to overcome. However, ‘liberal democracy,’ and Jihadi-liberalism is a nonstarter. These lead only to the destruction of nations and peoples. A form of regime politics evidently stronger than Ba’athism is called the proletarian dictatorship, and it is what

👏11😴6🤡1

27 Mar 2025, 00:20 UTC519 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

FREEDOM AND AUTHORITY: WHY SYRIA IS NOT FREE. We have witnessed scores of celebrations in the streets of Syria's major cities, and across social media in the aftermath of the collapse of Syria's state. Such scenes are reminiscent of the original 'Arab spring' in 2011. People have evidently since not learned the lessons of why liberalism is fundamentally incapable of achieving freedom for a people. Of course, in the a

👍2

8 Mar 2025, 22:30 UTC639 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @levantinenationPhoto

🏴 - From Al Jazeera, this is what the general Sunni opinion on ISIS was in 2014. "Do you support the victory of ISIS? Yes: 81.60% No: 18.40%" Then when they started losing, ISIS became a CIA-Mossad psyop that doesn't represent Islam. Precious.

👏9👎6👍51

27 Dec 2024, 19:35 UTC≈1,190 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Note by Engels: A peculiar antithesis to this was the religious risings in the Mohammedan world, particularly in Africa. Islam is a religion adapted to Orientals, especially Arabs, i.e., on one hand to townsmen engaged in trade and industry, on the other to nomadic Bedouins. Therein lies, however, the embryo of a periodically recurring collision. The townspeople grow rich, luxurious and lax in the observation of the

🤡11👍6👎2👌1🤔1

16 Dec 2024, 18:09 UTC≈1,210 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢15🖕11👏3👎2🤣2

15 Dec 2024, 19:54 UTC≈1,090 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👎2💔21

15 Dec 2024, 19:53 UTC≈1,100 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁18🖕11👎10💯3

9 Dec 2024, 11:49 UTC≈1,090 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💔24🤣14🌚1🤮1

2 Dec 2024, 20:09 UTC≈1,090 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡PMF (hashd) and others have encircled the frontline from khanaser to east hama and north hama

🔥10🫡2😴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Dongistan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dongistan 🛢️” (@Dongistan), 336 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dongistan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.