Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DonEx Code

Channel

DonEx Code

@DonExCode

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

2,337subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648846362
TypeChannel
Username@DonExCode
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DonExCode

Growth

2,2812,3372,3097 August 2026 — 2,284 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,284 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,281 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,308 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,321 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,326 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,333 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,335 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,337 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,273–2,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 00:282,337+2
24 Aug 2026, 17:342,335+2
20 Aug 2026, 15:222,333+7
17 Aug 2026, 14:252,326+5
13 Aug 2026, 23:372,321+13
10 Aug 2026, 15:422,308+27
7 Aug 2026, 19:542,281-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:472,284no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:372,284first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.4%
avg views ÷ 2,337 subscribers
Avg views / post
710
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (13 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,130
Reactions total81
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

593 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16527.8%
🔥10417.5%
7112.0%
😁549.11%
🌭355.90%
🗿325.40%
💯294.89%
👾233.88%
🤯162.70%
132.19%
🤔132.19%
🤣91.52%
👨‍💻71.18%
🤡61.01%
🤬40.675%
💩30.506%
👀20.337%
👏20.337%
😢20.337%
🤓20.337%
1 further kind10.169%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 593reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DonExCode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,300
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,670
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjevWZjG127 June 202627 June 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC467 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Прогнал факты по факту 😎 ИИ-шка иногда как выдаст базу, так аж плакать от смеха хочется) Тоже выдам пару фактов. Первый. Завтра видос) Сборка NAS с работой над ошибками и впиховыванием невпихуемого. Второй. Китайцы на али - чудаки на букву М. Прислали мертвую материнку, поэтому пришлось задействовать доску под 3 сборку, И перезаказывать новую. Кажется, призрачные планы, собрать лабу полностью до конца лета - был

🔥102😁21

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC737 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💻 Обзорный видос DELL R660 от Сервер Центра. Для любителей энтерпрайз железок. Коротенький ролик на 6 минут. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEo1fe9zv6E Не реклама. Мое личное желание порекомендовать конкретный ролик. Некоторые ждут от меня подобных видосов, но я пока не могу делать такие ролики, потому что у самого нет возможности щупать подобное оборудование. Чтобы снимать такое, нужно как минимум иметь магазин

🤔7👍5

3 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC926 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💸Честно про рекламу на канале Сегодняшний пост для тех, кто не просто интересуется хоумлабингом, а кому интересна жизнь канала. Знакомые, которые в курсе про канал, иногда спрашивают: по каким принципам я беру рекламодателей в интеграции, что отвергаю, проверяю ли тех, с кем работаю. Расскажу как есть. Реклама на канале есть и будет. Ничего плохого в этом не вижу. Проекты вроде домашней стойки отнимают кучу сил, в

35👍19

18 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,560 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Яркий представитель диванной экспертизы. Если китайцы дали 8 слотов, это не значит, что они дали вам 8 каналов, К сожалению... Про 2 канала на каждый сокет написано в самой спеке платы, Как раз вставил это в ролик для тех людей, кто думал, что купит такого китайца, получит 8 каналов и бОльшую пропускную способность.

😁27🤣83💯2

18 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,550 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🧠 Свой Chat GPT. Без подписки. Без VPN. Без Интернета. Без видеокарты Взял свою старую сборку - двухсокетный сервер на китайской X99 - два Xeon E5-2680v4 и 128 ГБ DDR4 - и проверил, какие большие модели он реально тянет на голом процессоре. От Qwen3-Coder 30B до gpt-oss 120B и Qwen3-235B, все замеры в llama.cpp. Разбираемся, почему модель на 120 миллиардов работает вровень с моделью на 35, где второй процессор помо

👍11🔥8

17 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,450 views35 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Самое большое заблуждение, когда приходит идея для ролика и ты такой: "Ну, тема интересная, давно хотел попробовать, да и видос не длинный должен выйти, минут на 10-15". А через неделю смотришь на итоговый таймлайн и видишь 30 минут 👀 С учетом того, что еще 10 из них были вырезаны... В общем, в эту субботу в 11:00 по МСК, как обычно, видос. Будем запускать большие LLM с божией помощью допотопного железа

👍24😁7🔥3🤔1

27 Jun 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,300 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjevWZjG

💻 Сервер виртуализации за 200 000р Продолжаю собирать Homelab 2.0 - на этот раз ферма виртуализации на 64 потока, 128 ГБ ECC REG DDR4 RAM, enterprise SSD в RAID 10 и Proxmox под капотом. Рассказываю логику выбора железа, показываю грабли с SAS-дисками и кулерами - и в конце честная смета на ~190к. 🆎 Ролик: https://youtu.be/QrZ0GGyeITk 🥴 Моя материнка по двум самым низким, на данный момент ценам, чекайте цену дос

👍12🔥31

25 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,150 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какие видосы чаще смотрите

  1. До 10 минут7%
  2. До 15 минут12%
  3. До 20 минут30%
  4. До 30 минут42%
  5. До 40 минут31%
  6. До 50 минут20%
  7. До 1 часа38%
  8. Более 1 часа34%

The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤔4

25 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,810 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👀 Длинные видосы - это скучно? Готовлю экспериментальный видос на 40 минут. Сильно за рамками формата, но хотелось бы подробнее рассказать про сборку и выбор железа для #homelab Хотел бы узнать, как вы обычно оцениваете, стоит ли смотреть ролик или нет по его продолжительности. Поэтому с вас ответ в опросе И ставьте эмодзи если выбираете контент: 🌭 - под еду 👨‍💻 - на работе/в перерыве 👾 - в свободное время/выходно

🌭35👾23👨‍💻7👍2

10 Jun 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,280 views54 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

🤔 Эта ошибка могла стоить мне 20 000Р В последнем ролике, я рассказывал: как взял себе MikroTik RB5009, настроил сплит-роутинг и сделал так, чтобы "замедленные" сайты автоматически ходили через "ускоритель". Список IP (около 200 000 адресов на данный момент). Собирает эти адреса — самописный сервис multipass. И каждые несколько часов, MikroTIk скачиваел его и добавлял записи в address-list. Под роликом увидел хорош

🔥34👍109🤔1

6 Jun 2026, 08:11 UTC≈2,120 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌐 сплит-роутинг в домашнем сервере Продолжаю собирать Homelab 2.0 - на этот раз интегрирую сетевое оборудование. Сплит-роутинг прямо на роутере MikroTik RB5009. Написал свой сервис, который сам собирает актуальный список IP для "ускорения" - им можно пользоваться, исходники ниже. 🆎 Ролик: https://youtu.be/4JWSQMHww48 ☁️ Multipass - сервис для сборки списка IP: https://github.com/donexdoc/multipass 🖥 Ушки для кре

12👍6👏1

1 Jun 2026, 06:16 UTC≈2,240 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌐 Сервер - это железо, софт или роль?) Несколько людей написали что это роль. А чем определяется эта роль? Сюрприз-сюрприз: софтом, который запущен на железе. Вы не можете назвать raspberry pi ретроконсолью, пока не поставили на нее ПО, чтобы это стало действительностью. Вы не можете назвать ваш компьютер веб-сервером, если на нем не запущен ни один сервис, отвечающий за работу веб-сервера. От того, что вы его н

😁18👍14🔥21👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DonExCode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTCAnonymous Poll328 voters

Какие видосы чаще смотрите

  1. До 10 минут7%
  2. До 15 минут12%
  3. До 20 минут30%
  4. До 30 минут42%
  5. До 40 минут31%
  6. До 50 минут20%
  7. До 1 часа38%
  8. Более 1 часа34%

The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DonEx Code” (@DonExCode), 2,337 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DonExCode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.