Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dollar Earning ๐Ÿ’ต

Channel

Dollar Earning ๐Ÿ’ต

@Dollars_Earning

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Channels linked by matching posts ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

297,945subscribers

+33,209 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ€“316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002724474170
TypeChannel
Username@Dollars_Earning
Description๐Ÿค– @Dollar_EarningBot Earn Free Dollar Easily ๐Ÿ’ต ๐Ÿ‘ค Per Invite $1 ๐ŸŽ Daily Bonus $0.5 โ˜‘๏ธ Payment Channel @Payment_Dollar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dollars_Earning

Topic

Marketing & affiliate โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโ€™s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts โ€” open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Dollars_Earning/1223 ยท this entry9 Apr 2026, 16:27 UTC@KaIi_Bots/13139 Apr 2026, 18:56 UTC1.002.5 hours
@Dollars_Earning/1227 ยท this entry10 Apr 2026, 16:04 UTC@KaIi_Bots/131510 Apr 2026, 16:11 UTC1.008 minutes
@KaIi_Bots/132424 Apr 2026, 11:48 UTC@Dollars_Earning/1233 ยท this entry24 Apr 2026, 18:43 UTC1.006.9 hours
@KaIi_Bots/132614 May 2026, 18:09 UTC@Dollars_Earning/1234 ยท this entry17 May 2026, 12:30 UTC1.003 days
@KaIi_Bots/13349 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC@Dollars_Earning/1246 ยท this entry9 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@KaIi_Bots9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.0 hours@KaIi_Bots (7โ€“2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ€” in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

โ€œPublished firstโ€ means first in this corpus. We hold 23 comparable posts for this entry, running 19 November 2025 to 22 October 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detectorโ€™s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @KaIi_Bots. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. โ€œFirstโ€ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a โ€œForwarded fromโ€ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

264,736297,945281,340.57 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net +33,209. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 259,755โ€“302,926 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:59297,945+565
9 Nov 2026, 21:37297,380+434
8 Nov 2026, 13:38296,946+570
7 Nov 2026, 07:40296,376+372
6 Nov 2026, 08:20296,004+315
5 Nov 2026, 10:47295,689+323
4 Nov 2026, 13:00295,366+191
3 Nov 2026, 15:18295,175+322
2 Nov 2026, 15:11294,853+175
1 Nov 2026, 15:19294,678-239
31 Oct 2026, 13:55294,917+135
30 Oct 2026, 14:16294,782+235
29 Oct 2026, 10:54294,547+494
28 Oct 2026, 04:59294,053+242
27 Oct 2026, 06:30293,811+364
26 Oct 2026, 06:35293,447+277
25 Oct 2026, 09:09293,170+235
24 Oct 2026, 06:55292,935+252
23 Oct 2026, 03:36292,683-152
22 Oct 2026, 03:36292,835first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
10.9%
avg views รท 297,945 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,500
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.642%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held32 (19 November 2025 โ€“ 31 October 2026)
Views total97,600
Reactions total627
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
21
Videos
2
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 42s
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

26,854 reactions across 32 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค15,27456.9%
๐Ÿ‘3,89814.5%
๐Ÿ’ฏ1,7286.43%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9923.69%
๐Ÿ†8813.28%
๐Ÿฆ„7952.96%
โšก7392.75%
๐Ÿ˜Ž6922.58%
๐Ÿฅฐ6672.48%
๐Ÿ†’6522.43%
๐Ÿณ5362.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 26,854 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,126
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 32 we hold a reading for ยท 50%
Most on one post
1,050
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @Dollars_Earning. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 November 2025 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 15:08 UTCโ‰ˆ24,800 views232 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

Free 20$ Giveaway for Everyone ๐ŸŽ โ•ญโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฎ ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘‰ @Pay_Plus_Bot โ•ฐโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฏ

โค136๐Ÿ‘27๐Ÿ’ฏ24๐Ÿฆ„19๐Ÿ†’9๐Ÿ˜Ž7๐Ÿณ6๐Ÿฅฐ4

22 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTCโ‰ˆ21,400 views219 reactions51 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

PayPlus first app inside telegram that pay you for watching short ads ๐ŸŽฅ Earning Methods: ๐Ÿ’ต ๐Ÿ‘€ Watching Ads = $5 ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Inviting Freind = $0.75 ๐Ÿ“ Doing Tasks = $3 ๐Ÿ‘› Payment Methods: โ€ข Crypto โ€ข PayPal โ€ข Mobile Top-up Start now and earn 50$ daily without any investment ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘‡ ๏ปฟ

โค133๐Ÿ‘30๐Ÿฆ„19๐Ÿ’ฏ13๐Ÿ˜Ž9โšก6๐Ÿณ5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4

15 Oct 2026, 05:08 UTCโ‰ˆ51,400 views176 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

Anyone Can Earn $100 Today! ๐Ÿ‘‘ โ•ญโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฎ ๐Ÿ†”๐Ÿค– @Pay_Plus_Bot โ•ฐโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฏ

โค109๐Ÿ‘19๐Ÿ’ฏ16๐Ÿฆ„15โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ7๐Ÿ†’6๐Ÿ†4

12 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTCโ‰ˆ55,500 views179 reactions1,050 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

My Third Witdraw Received 25$ ๐Ÿ‘› Watch short ads and earn 30$ daily with PayPlus app ๐Ÿ’ต โ•ญโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฎ ๐Ÿ†”๐Ÿค– @Pay_Plus_Bot โ•ฐโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฏ

โค107๐Ÿ‘24๐Ÿ’ฏ19๐Ÿ˜Ž17๐Ÿณ5๐Ÿฆ„4๐Ÿ†’3

5 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTCโ‰ˆ63,700 views266 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

๐ŸŒŸ Free PUBG UC ๐Ÿ’ธ

โค161๐Ÿ‘36๐Ÿ†’22๐Ÿ’ฏ21๐Ÿ˜Ž17๐Ÿณ8๐Ÿฆ„1

5 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTCโ‰ˆ61,900 views157 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

Earn $50 Daily without investment ๐Ÿค‘ ๐ŸŽฎ Playing Game = $2 ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Inviting Friend = $1 ๐ŸŽ Watching Ads = $3 โœ”๏ธ 4 Payment Methods Don't miss it! There is no such more bot that pay you like this๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ’ต โ•ญโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฎ ๐Ÿ†”๐Ÿค– @Dollar_EarningBot โ•ฐโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฏ

โค114๐Ÿ‘16๐Ÿ’ฏ8๐Ÿ†’8๐Ÿฆ„6๐Ÿณ3๐Ÿ†1๐Ÿ˜Ž1

23 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTCโ‰ˆ80,900 views567 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ”ง All Bugs related to Payment and Witdraw fully fixed in new update, payments are now processing within a minute โœ… Report any technical issues or problem to our Support team โค๏ธ

โค317๐Ÿ‘79๐Ÿ†52๐Ÿ˜Ž30๐Ÿฅฐ28๐Ÿฆ„22โšก18โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ16

19 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTCโ‰ˆ1,050 views38 reactionsread 19 September 2026

๐ŸŽ Free 100 Credits ๐ŸŽซ Only for 100 first people

โค33๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ’ฏ1

9 Sept 2026, 04:40 UTCโ‰ˆ1,570 views20 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Anyone Can Earn $50 Today! ๐Ÿ‘‘ โ•ญโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฎ ๐Ÿ†”๐Ÿค– @Free_USD_Bot ๐Ÿ’ต โ•ฐโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฏ

โค13๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ’ฏ1

6 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTCโ‰ˆ109,000 views787 reactions986 Starsread 12 November 2026
Video

How to earn $100 daily just by watching short ads with PayPlus๐Ÿ”ฅ Earning Methods: ๐Ÿ’ต ๐Ÿ‘€ Watching Ads = $5 ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Inviting Freind = $1 ๐Ÿ“ Doing Tasks = $3 ๐Ÿ‘› Payment Methods: โ€ข Crypto โ€ข PayPal โ€ข Mobile Top-up Start now and earn $100 daily without any investment ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘‡ ๏ปฟ โ•ญโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฎ ๐Ÿ†”๐Ÿค– @Pay_Plus_Bot โ•ฐโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฏ

โค470๐Ÿ‘138๐Ÿ’ฏ69๐Ÿ†43๐Ÿ†’18โšก17๐Ÿฆ„17๐Ÿณ15

27 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTCโ‰ˆ120,000 views630 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Anyone Can Earn $100 Today! ๐Ÿ‘‘ โ•ญโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฎ ๐Ÿ†”๐Ÿค– @Pay_Plus_Bot โ•ฐโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ”ˆโ•ฏ

โค341๐Ÿ‘90โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ59๐Ÿ’ฏ37๐Ÿ†33โšก24๐Ÿ†’18๐Ÿณ16

9 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTCโ‰ˆ167,000 views998 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

PayPlus first app inside telegram that pay you for watching short ads ๐ŸŽฅ Earning Methods: ๐Ÿ’ต ๐Ÿ‘€ Watch short Ads = $5 ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Per Invite Freind = $0.7 ๐Ÿ“Complete Tasks = 2$ ๐Ÿ‘› Payment Methods: โ€ข Crypto โ€ข PayPal โ€ข Mobile Top-up Start now and earn 50$ daily without any investment ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘‡

โค514๐Ÿ‘163โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ87๐Ÿฆ„58๐Ÿ’ฏ36โšก34๐Ÿ˜Ž32๐Ÿณ30

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Dollars_Earning. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Dollars_Earning edited 2 posts after it first published โ€” the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ€” this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @Dollars_Earning as deleted โ€” posts this register held that were missing from the channelโ€™s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโ€™s public page, and when โ€” not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
27 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œDollar Earning ๐Ÿ’ตโ€ (@Dollars_Earning), 297,945 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dollars_Earning.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.