So, дорогие оставшиеся подписчики, которым интересен именно автор этого канала, переходите по ссылке

Channel
Doctor Nerd
@DoctorNerder
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001286895557 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DoctorNerder |
| Description | (Не)своевременные наблюдения белой гвардии искусств |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 25 June 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DoctorNerder |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 18 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 18 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 61
- Links
- 18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Hallo всем! Не пугайтесь этот «стажёр» создал очередной телеграм-канал. Но зачем? Наверное, чтобы экспериментировать со стилем. Мой стиль сейчас - серенький и информационный. Он может нравиться, может раздражать, а может не вызывать никаких эмоций. Я понимаю, что очень хочу создать какую-то узнаваемость и уникальность. Почему, читая книгу Маркеса, мы узнаём этого безбожного сорителя громадными абзацами? Потому что …
Где вы покупаете книги (в оффлайне)
- Читай-город69%
- Буквоед13%
- Амитель0%
- Республика13%
- Покупаю в онлайн магазинах44%
- Читаю в электронке38%
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Йоу, оцените канал моей коллеги. Я немного в ауте, но тут всегда будут самые неожиданные обзоры фильмов.
Не критикуйте мой манифест! Рецензия на Французский вестник // The French Dispatch (2021) Реж. Уэс Андерсон Мне кажется нельзя ненавидеть Уэса Андерсона. Его можно считать предсказуемым и ошибаться, но ненавидеть его нельзя. Я к тому, что "Французский вестник" — это Уэс Андерсон на максималках. Видно, что было много денег, времени на сценарий (не то, что у Нолана с "Доводом", но это в другой раз), поиск локаций (го…
File, posted without a caption
Чтобы вам было вайбово:
Photo, posted without a caption
Лето или фильм с вайбами 80-х. Если вы хотите посмотреть фильм, который оставит у вас легкое послевкусие питерского лета и молодости, то вам по адресу. В этой картине есть все: красивая история, чудесный саундтрек, достойная внимания режиссерская работа. В целом над картиной видна кропотливая работа. История основана на реальных событиях и показывает зрителю Виктора Цоя с пометкой «До того, как он стал известен». В…
4 сезон Элиты: зачем? Получилось ли у сценаристов сделать нормальное продолжение, или «Элиту» ждёт та же самая участь, что и «Бумажный дом»? Netflix, как и абсолютно любая компания, хочет денег. Именно поэтому законченные проекты продолжаются, что не всегда ведёт к хорошим последствиям. Например, продолжение «Бумажного дома» вышло чудовищно нелогичным. Видно было, что сделано оно только ради наживы коммерсов. Когд…
Photo, posted without a caption
Ну что, мой двухнедельный отпуск окончился. Я не привёз что-то крутое, но зато у меня есть бесплатные полотенца и магнитики. Шучу!
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @DoctorNerder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Где вы покупаете книги (в оффлайне)
- Читай-город69%
- Буквоед13%
- Амитель0%
- Республика13%
- Покупаю в онлайн магазинах44%
- Читаю в электронке38%
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2021 to 31 July 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@DoctorNerder named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doctor Nerd” (@DoctorNerder), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DoctorNerder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.