#شنبههایامالبنینی این گدا آزاد شد از هفت دولت تا شنید شنبه صبح ام البنین بیمه کند یک هفته را #محمدحسینرحیمیان
❤20❤🔥3😢1

Channel
@DoKhat_Sher
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
13,297subscribers
+83 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001052972319 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DoKhat_Sher |
| Description | #مولاناعلی💙 کلاف شعر دارم، سالها کارم غزل بافیست دراین بازار آشفته، علی تحسین کند کافیست ⚠️ کپی به هر نحوی حلال است 💠فعالیت اصلی در اینستاگرام : instagram.com/dokhat_sher 📽️ فيلم و عكس های خام: @ghafase110 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DoKhat_Sher |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 13,297 | +16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 13,281 | +13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 13,268 | +13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 13,255 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 13,243 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 13,232 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 13,221 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 13,212 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 13,214 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 13,214 | first reading |
57 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (1 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 87,416 |
| Reactions total | 1,970 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,740 reactions across 50 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 680 | 39.1% | |
| 😭 | 541 | 31.1% | |
| 💔 | 306 | 17.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 92 | 5.29% | |
| 😍 | 50 | 2.87% | |
| 😢 | 43 | 2.47% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 0.69% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.46% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.287% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.172% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,970reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#شنبههایامالبنینی این گدا آزاد شد از هفت دولت تا شنید شنبه صبح ام البنین بیمه کند یک هفته را #محمدحسینرحیمیان
❤20❤🔥3😢1
دلم آن خواب را میخواهد آن رویای بی تکرار
💔10😢5😭2
🔴 ماجرای عیادت سیاسی خلفای غاصبین از حضرت فاطمه زهرا سلاماللهعلیها در آخرین روزهای عمر شریف #حضرت_زهرا سلاماللهعلیها، حال عمومی ایشان بدتر شده و کسالت شدید آن حضرت و سخنانشان در بستر بیماری و رویگردانی ایشان از اهل شهر و به خصوص جملاتشان در ملاقات زنان انصار، تأثیر زیادی بر عواطف اهل مدینه و مسلمین گذاشته است. در عین حال، دستگاه خلافت به شدّت نیازمند بازسازی آبروی از دست رفتۀ خویش پس از جنایاتی که در حقّ یگان…
❤30💔3🔥2
روایتش را میدانید؟
😭5👌1😢1
#لعناللهقاتلیکیافاطمهالزهرا عجیب بعد پیمبر، علی مصیبت داشت میان اهل مدینه چقدر غربت داشت تمام غربت و غم های بیشمارِ علی از انحرافِ درونِ سقیفه نشأت داشت خیانتی که نمودند اهل ظلم به او به ذات اقدس حق ریشه در حسادت داشت اگر به صبر نبود آن یل عرب ملزم کسی برای ورود به خانه جرئت داشت؟ ببین چگونه زند نعره پشت در آن کس که در فرار ز میدان، فقط مهارت داشت! به پاک طینت عالم لگد زده آن که... به استناد روایات، خبث طی…
😭16💔6❤4
در بدر و خیبر و اُحد و لیله المبیت دستِ علیست در همه جا ختم غائله... #عاصیخراسانی 🎙️@kashani1395
❤🔥20❤9
در چنین روزی شورای کثیف سقیفه تشکیل شد و تمام مسلمین را از مسیر خدا منحرف کردند...
💔41😭16🔥4❤1
#اللهمالعنالجبتوالطاغوت🔥 سقیفه مرکز شورای افرادی ستمگر بود سقیفه پایگاه خصم سرسخت پیمبر بود جنایت،حقکشی،غارت،ستم؛در حقحیدر بود نه بلکه جنگ با قرآن و اسلام و پیمبر بود در آنجا با حضور چند تن اوباش شورا شد جنایاتی که در او تا قیامت رفته امضا شد #غلامرضاسازگار
😭24❤5💔5👌3🔥1
قال مولانا الرضا علیهالسلام: یا ابن شبیب! ان کنت باکیا لشی ء فابک للحسین... اى پسر شبيب! اگر مى خواهى براى چيزى بگريى، براى حسين بن على بن ابى طالب عليهما السلام گريه كن... #شبجمعستهوایتنکنممیمیرم یابن الشبیب!گریه فقط بر غم حسین یابن الشبیب!گریه فقط بهر كربلا یابن الشبیب درد حسین درد جان فزاست یابن الشبیب!روضه ی ما داغ پر بلا است یابن الشبیب!درد حسین درد بی کسی است یعنی عزیز فاطمه شبگرد بی کسی است یابن الشبیب…
😭14💔6❤4
اَباصلت میگوید: خدمت آقا بودم به من فرمود: اباصلت، منتظرم بمان اگر آمدم و دیدی عبا به سر افکنده ام دیگر با من صحبت نکن بدان مرا مسموم کرده اند. بدان هدفشان را به نتیجه رسانده اند. اباصلت میگوید: آقا رفت من هم چشم به در گشودم. خدا کند اقا عبا به سر نیفکنده باشد, اما یک وقت دیدم در باز شد, امام عبا را به سر افکنده از خانه مأمون بیرون آمد, نمی دانم چه شده بود؟ اما بعد از هر چند قدمی یک لحظه مینشست, یک لحظه بلند میشد. …
😭19💔7❤2😢1
روایات بسیاری گواهی میدهند که معصوم را جز معصوم نمیتواند غسل و کفن و دفن کند. این حجتی است الهی؛ چرا که تغسیل و تدفین و نماز پیامبران نیز، بر عهدهی جانشینان آنان است. سنتی است از پیامبران گذشته که وصی، متولی این امر باشد. همانگونه که امیرالمؤمنین (ع)، وصی رسول خدا بود و خود بر پیکر پیامبر اکرم (ص) نماز خواند و او را غسل و کفن کرد. و در همین مسیر، هر امامی تنها به دست امام بعدی غسل داده میشود. چنانکه در وصایای ا…
😭31❤9💔7
#انکنتباکیالشیءفابکللحسین با سر و پای برهنه حالا پشت در آمده گریان پسرش رسم این است پسر وقت وداع می نشیند به کنار پدرش سر اورا به بغل میگیرد تا بیاید نفس مختصرش جدّش اما به سر جسم علی آنقدر سوخت که خم شد کمرش هفت دفعه ولدی گفت ولی.. غیر خس خس نرسید از ثمرش #سیدپوریاهاشمی
😭20❤5😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @DoKhat_Sher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@DoKhat_Sher edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 305,669 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“" دو خط شعر "” (@DoKhat_Sher), 13,297 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DoKhat_Sher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.